Case law

Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola

283 S.W. 777 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 26, 1926

As was said by the court in the case of Calhoun v. G. C. & S. F. Ry. Co., 84 Tex. 226 , 19 S. … Co. v. Lee, 70 Tex. 501 , 7 S. W. 857 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Murphy, 46 Tex. 356 , 26 Am. Rep. 272 . We recommend that both judgments be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court. OURETON, C.

Camara v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr. E.

2015 Ohio 5554 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 31, 2015

Plaintiff v. … Sklaroff is not board certified in hematology because he did not pass the board certification test. Dr.

Smiley, Shane v. Four Seasons Coach Leasing, Inc., et al.

2016 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2016

Galloway v. … Tryon v. Saturn Corp., 254 S.W.3d 321, 327 (Tenn. 2008).

Opinion No. 68-260 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1968

In the case of Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v. … Dealing more specifically with zoning ordinances, in the case of Shaw v. Calvary Baptist Church et al., 184 Okl.

In re the Estate of Durant

109 Misc. 62 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1919

While it is the rule in this state that the word £ ‘ issue ’ ’ will be construed to mean descendants generally (Schmidt v. Jewett, 195 N. … Div. 176 ; Brown v. Tanz, 176 id. 795. There are in the will of the testator many mani *64 festations of an intent to give his property to his children to the. exclusion of his grandchildren.

Revnew, Deborah v. Amazon.com, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 3, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Deborah Revnew ) Docket No. 2016-06-0320 ) v. … Norton v. McCaskill, 12 S.W.3d 789, 795 (Tenn. 2000) (Issues raised for the first time on appeal will usually be deemed waived.); Lawrence v.

Weber v. State

111 Misc. 2d 809 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1981

(Weber v State of New York, 104 Misc 2d 947 .) The subsequent decision of the board states “Case was Closed. No accident under Workmen’s [sic] Compensation Law. Claim Disallowed.” … (Pfeiffer v McCall, 11 AD2d 95 .)

In re the creation, powers & prerogatives

3 N.J. Misc. 585 · New Jersey Court of Pardons · Jul 1, 1925

In Clifford v. Heller, 63 N. J. … Although the case of Gook v.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1998

Supp. 1997, § 3[ 85-3 ] (6); see also Crowder v. Continental Materials Company, 590 P.2d 201 , 203 (Okla. 1979); Bowman v. … Atkinson v. Haliburton Company, 905 P.2d 772 , 776 (Okla. 1995); Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 833 P.2d 1218 , 1229 (Okla. 1992). Therefore, there is nothing mandating the owner-employee to obtain such a certificate.

Harper, Randall v. USF Holland Trucking Co.

2016 TN WC 90 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 22, 2016

Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (quoting Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991)). Even if Dr. Pietrangelo's record and Dr. … ENTERED THIS THE 22ndD4-~ Robert V.

Andrews, Torey v. Yates Services, LLC

2018 TN WC App. 20 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 8, 2018

See, e.g., Fretwell v. … In Perdue v.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Maledon

27 S.W.2d 151 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 7, 1930

In due time and proper form, appellant filed his claim for compensation before the Industrial Accident Board, and, from the award of that board, properly perfected his appeal to the district court of Dallas county, Tex. … Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Association v. Pollard (Tex. Com. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 982, 983 , and Petroleum Casualty Co. v. Seale, 13 S.W.(2d) 364 (Tex. Com.

City of East Orange v. Joshua Hendy Iron Works

24 N.J. Misc. 82 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 12, 1946

Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. et al. v. City of Gloucester, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1912-1934, p. 266. … Howard Savings Institution v. Newark, 63 N. J. L. 547; 44 Atl. Rep. 654 . The action of the Essex County Board of Taxation is affirmed.

Williams v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 31, 2010

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 2.

Middle East Export Co. v. Concordia Line, Skibs A/S Hilda Knudson

64 Misc. 2d 270 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Sep 18, 1970

(Israel Commodity Co. v. American-West Africa Line, supra; Baird v. Daly, 57 N. Y. 236 [1874]; 8 Am. Jur. 2d, Bailments, § 243.) … In Head Co. v. Krawill Mach. Corp. ( 359 U.

Diggs v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 14, 2011

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 5.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Doubleday

17 Mills Surr. 458 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 30, 1916

Board ” is- defined as “ To receive food as a lodger, or without lodgings, for a compensation” (Pollock v. … Div. 253, 255 ; Kearney v. McKeon, 85 N. Y. 136 ; Matter of Van Slooten v. Wheeler, 140 id. 624; Porter v. Rhoades, 48 App. Div. 635 ; Forbes v. Chichester, 30 N. Y. St. Repr. 370.)

Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. Yarbrough

215 S.W. 842 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 12, 1919

The purported inventory taken by plaintiff in error furnishes data from which the number of feet of pine boards, oak boards, oak timber, and the gum ties can be ascertained. … Rep. 7 ; Combes et al. v. Stringer, 105 Tex. 427 , 167 S. W. 217 ; H. & T. C. Ry. Co. v. State, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 117 , 56 S. W. 228 ; K. C. M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Pope, 152 S. W. 185 ; Id., 153 S. W. 163 ; Ft. Worth & D.

410 Lenox Ave. Apts., Inc. v. Community II Supermarket, Inc.

135 Misc. 2d 628 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 19, 1987

Murphy , presumably to avoid Federal and State constitutional problems addressed in such cases as Fuentes v Shevin ( 407 US 67 [1972]) and Sharrock v Dell Buick-Cadillac ( 45 NY2d 152 [1978]), held that such entry is made … Auth., 88 Misc 2d 121 [App Term, 1st Dept 1976]; City of New York v Brown, 119 Misc 2d 1054 [Civ Ct, Kings County 1982]). A final judgment of possession shall issue stayed for 10 days.

People v. Ferro

66 Misc. 2d 752 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jun 15, 1971

At the outset it might seem that in the three quarters of a century since the decision of Brown v. Walker ( 161 U. … Decisions of the Supreme Court subsequent to Counselman regarded it as the holding; Brown v.