Case law

Duffee v. Mason

8 Cow. 25 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 15, 1827

(Cave v. Coleman, 3 Mann. & Ryl. 2; and see Chapman v. Murch , 19 John. R. 290; Sweet v. Colgate, 20 John. R. 203; Bacon v. Brown, 3 Bibb, 35 ; Jackson v. Witherell, 7 Serg. & Rawle, 482 ; Cramer v. Bradshaw, 10 John. … R. 484; Gilchrist v. Mann, 2 Car. Law Repos. 667 ; Erwin v. Maxwell, 2 Murph. 245 ; Robers v. Morgan, 2 Cowen’s Rep. 438.)

German Apostolic Christian Church v. Department of Revenue

6 Or. Tax 521 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 28, 1976

See YMCA v. Dept. of Rev., 268 Or 633 , 522 P2d 464 (1974) ; Benevolent Society v. … In Benevolent Society v.

Bauknecht v. Five Star Quality Care, Inc.

2019 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 10, 2019

Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. Kenneth D. Veit and Carolina V. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

MacDonald, Michael v. Greene County Sheriff"s Department

2015 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 4, 2015

Long v. Hamilton-Ryker, No. 2015-07-0023, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 23, at *14 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. July 31, 2015). … See Waters v.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2002

See, e.g., 67 O.S. 2001 , § 203[ 67-203 ] (d) (defining "agency" as "any department, office, commission, board, authority or other unit, however designated, of the state government." … Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., 984 P.2d 194 , 199 (Okla. 1999).

Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Stevens

24 S.W.2d 9 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 12, 1930

Co. v. Syfan, 91 Tex. 562 , 44 S. W. 1064 ; Wilson v. Freeman, 108 Tex. 121 , 185 S. W. 993 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 1203; Emberlin v. Ry. Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 284 S. W. 539 ; Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. Mann, 130 U. … However, in the Syfan Case the Supreme Court, in a very exhaustive opinion by Justice Brown, reviewed at great length the authorities on this question, and finally upheld the constitutionality of the act, and the power and

Day, Misti v. Great Salons of Knoxville, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 49 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 24, 2021

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Misti G. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Justus, Joseph v. Blalock & Sons, Inc.

2020 TN WC 70 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 6, 2020

See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Accounting of Fusco

28 Misc. 2d 1010 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 27, 1961

Brown, Justice of the Supreme Court and Acting Surrogate. … There was an ademption and the specific devisees consequently receive neither the property nor its proceeds (Ametrano v. Downs, 170 N. Y. 388 ; Matter of Brann, 219 N.

Cauble v. Soft-Play Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 26, 1995

Death Certificate of Jimmy Brown Staton. 4. Death Certificate of Jamey Staton. 5. Marriage License of Jimmy Brown Staton and Venita Elaine Franklin Gilmore. 6. … Murray v. Associated Insurers, Inc. , 114 N.C. App. 506 , 442 S.E.2d 370 (1994), cert. denied , 338 N.C. 519 (1995); Martin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. , 5 N.C. App. 37 , 167 S.E.2d 790 (1969). 3.

Saxon v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

36 S.W.2d 228 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

R. v. Allen, 276 U. S. 165 , 48 S. Ct. 215 , 72 L. Ed. 513 . … Davis, Federal Agent, v. Preston (Tex. Civ. App.) 264 S. W. 331 ; Id., 118 Tex. 303 , 16 S.W.(2d) 117 .

Davis v. Lund

41 S.W.2d 57 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 22, 1931

Brown v. Ackerman (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 771 . In this connection, we quote the following from Judge Gaines’ opinion in White v. McGregor, supra. … v.

Hockaday v. N.C. D.O.C.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 1, 2005

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Davis v. NC State Highway Commission , 271 N.C. 405 , 156 S.E.2d 685 (1967). *********** The foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law engender the following: ORDER 1.

Opinion No. 78-248 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1978

Moore-Norman Area Vocational Technical School District v. Board of Trustees of South Oklahoma City Junior College, 519 P.2d 497 , 501 (Okla. 1974). See also McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. … Grand Jury of McCurtain County v. Pate, 572 P.2d 226 (Okla. 1977); Wiseman v. Boren, 545 P.2d 753 (Okla. 1976).

Consistory of the Congregation of Paramus v. Township of Ridgewood

20 N.J. Misc. 125 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 24, 1942

The Ewing Cemetery Association, Inc., v. Ewing Township (State Board, 1940), 18 N. J. Mis. R. 558; 15 Atl. Rep. (2d) 195; affirmed (Supreme Court, 1941), 126 N. J. L. 610; 20 Atl. Rep. (2d) 607. … See City of Clifton v. East Ridgelawn Cemetery Association (State Board, 1939), New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 725; Borough of Leonia v. Church of the Madonna (State Board, 1939), Id. 779.

Weatherspoon Fam. LLC v. Hatteras Inv. Partners, L.P.

2026 NCBC 12 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 11, 2026

Plaintiff further contends that Perkins made misrepresentations to HMF’s board in connection with HMF’s transaction with Ben and that the act of making misrepresentations to HMF’s board necessarily means that there was … Wood v.

King v. Administrative Office of the Courts

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 2, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Wirth v. Bracey , 258 N.C. 505 , 128 S.E.2d 810 (1963).

Opinion No. 69-188 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1969

(Emphasis added) The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma in State ex rel Settles v. Board of Education of Dependent School District no. … (Emphasis added) The Supreme Court has held in Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 195 Ok 1 . 342, 91 P.2d 771 (1939), that: "A school district is a subordinate agency of the State. . . ."

In re the Accounting of Solomon

18 Misc. 2d 984 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 20, 1959

Co. v. Pink, 276 N. Y. 421, 426 .)” The court went on to say that in collecting a sales tax, the city acts as an agent of the State. Matter of Brown Print. Co. ( 285 N.

Alford v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 30, 2010

Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988).