Case law

Griffin v. Twin Valley Psychiatric Systems

118 Ohio Misc. 2d 301 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jun 5, 2002

Cascone v. Herb Kay Co. (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 155 , 6 OBR 209, 451 N.E.2d 815 , paragraph one of the syllabus; Thrash v. U-Drive It Co. (1953), 158 Ohio St. 465 , 49 O.O. 402 , 110 N.E.2d 419 ; White v. … R.C. 5122.34(A); Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Ctr. (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 284 , 673 N.E.2d 1311 ; Littleton v.

Rivers v. Dept. of Justice

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 21, 2008

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2.

McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics

2015 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 10, 2015

See Hood v. Jenkins, 432 S.W.3d 814, 822 (Tenn. 2013). … Hames v. State, 808 S.W.2d 41, 44 (Tenn. 1991) (quoting Butts v. City of South Fulton, 565 S.W.2d 879, 882 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1978)).

Gamel v. City Nat. Bank of Colorado Tex.

258 S.W. 1043 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 27, 1924

Phelps v. Brackett, 24 Tex. 236 ; Caldwell v. Brown, 43 Tex. 216 ; Focke v. Sterling, 18 Tex. Civ. App. 8 , 44 S. W. 611 ; Poe v. Hall (Tex. Civ. App.) 241 S. W. 708 . … So, in Vosburgh v. Brown, 66 Barb. (N.

Taylor v. Taylor

3 Bradf. 54 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1854

Whittaker, 4 Brown’s C. C. 31. 1 Sugden, V. and P., p. 180, 9th ed.)

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1988

ATTORNEY GENERAL HENRY HAS RECEIVED YOUR RECENT LETTER ASKING FOR ADVICE AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF AN ATTORNEY RETAINED BY A GOVERNING BOARD OF A STATE AGENCY TO ACT AS ITS LEGAL COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF AN EMPLOYEE OF … OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION V. MCNAUQHTON, 719 P.2D 1279 (OKLA. 1986). THE RATIONALE BEHIND THIS RULE IS SIMPLE. A LAWYER MAY NOT SERVE TWO MASTERS AT ONE TIME WHO HAVE CONFLICTING INTERESTS.

Opinion No. 75-265 (1975) Ag Disposition : See: Opinion No. 80-111 (1980) See: Opinion No. 80-166 (1980)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1975

See Smith v. State, Okl. Cr., 510 P.2d 962 (1973). … In the case of Allen v. State, Okl.

Kassmieh, Michael v. NEIS, INC.

2020 TN WC 7 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 20, 2020

Inds., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. … Robert V.

KSS Transportation Corp. v. Baldwin

9 N.J. Tax 273 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 21, 1987

Board of National Missions v. Neeld, 9 N.J. 349, 353 , 88 A.2d 500 (1952); Phelps Dodge Indus. v. Taxation Div. Director, 8 N.J.Tax 354, 358 (Tax Ct.1986). … My conclusion is supported by the case of Pacific Southwest Airlines v. State Board of Equalization, 140 Cal.Rptr. 543 , 73 Cal.App.3d 32 (App.Div.1977).

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1996

Chadwick v. Earhart, 4 P. 1180 ,1181 (Or. 1884). … Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great National Corp., Inc., 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980).

Meany v. Wakemed

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 3, 2007

Mukesh Kamdar, a board-certified psychiatrist, because, as Dr. … Carnes, Kim Brown, RN, who conducted a home evaluation and spoke with *Page 10 numerous other health care providers, as documented in her report. In addition, Ms.

Emily Towers Owners Corp. v. Carleton Emily Towers, L.P.

170 Misc. 2d 82 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 21, 1996

Corp. v Kelly, 124 Misc 2d 870, 873 , affd 108 AD2d 1107 , mod on other grounds sub nom. Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. Co., 66 NY2d 556 ). … Pursuant to section 18.3 (v) (5) (iii), if the conversion plan is a noneviction plan, the sponsor may exercise veto power for no more than five years over board resolutions regarding expenses.

Sessa v. Trustees of Mortuary Fund of Local No. 1

85 Misc. 2d 372 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 20, 1976

(Salvin v Salvin, 165 App Div 362 ; see, also, Day v Case, 43 Hun 179 ; Matter of Shanley, 95 Misc 427.) … For a description of the manner in which this mortuary fund operated, see Local No. 1, Amalgamated Lithographers of Amer. v Brown ( 31 AD2d 127 , affd 27 NY2d 547 ).

Day, Misti v. Great Salons of Knoxville, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 49 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 24, 2021

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Misti G. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Norris v. Myrtle Desk Company Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 30, 1996

Henry v. Leather Company , 231 N.C. 477 , 57 S.E.2d 760 (1950); Wood v. J.P. Stevens , 297 N.C. 636 , 256 S.E.2d 692 (1979). 2. … Rutledge v. Tultex/Kings Yarns , 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983) In Dowdy v.

Burleson v. Germantown Partners Supercuts

2017 TN WC App. 47 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 15, 2017

Foreman v. Automatic Sys., Inc., 272 S.W.3d 560, 571 (Tenn. 2008). … Tryon v. Saturn Corp., 254 S.W.3d 321, 327 (Tenn. 2008). . . . See Clark v. Willamette Indus., Inc., No. E1999-02693-WC-R3- CV, 2001 Tenn. LEXIS 138, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

Williams v. Swift Textiles

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 10, 2000

The week following 6 June 1997, plaintiff received a call from plant manager, Jimmy Brown. Plaintiff told Jimmy Brown that she had hurt her back at work and Dr. Lopez had told her she was suffering a low back strain. … Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980). For the medical opinion testimony regarding causation to be sufficient, it must rise beyond mere speculation. Dean v.

Robinson v. N.C. D.O.C.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 29, 2005

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

Carrato v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jul 11, 2014

Jeff Brown, registered appraiser, appeared on behalf of Defendant. The parties discussed Plaintiffs’ appeal and Defendant’s Motion. … In its Motion, Defendant requested dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Complaint, stating that Plaintiffs failed to appeal to the Multnomah County Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA) as required under ORS 305.275(3) prior to appealing

Newton v. Ranger Transportation, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 22, 1999

. § 97-2 (2); Brown v. Truck Lines , 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E.2d 71 (1947). 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (2); Hoffman v. Truck Lines, Inc. , 306 N.C. 502 , 293 S.E.2d 807 (1982); Brown v. Truck Lines , 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E.2d 71 (1947); Smith v. Central Transport , 51 N.C. App. 316 , 276 S.E.2d 751 (1981). 4.