Case law

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 1979

Wright v. State, 192 Okl. 493 , 137 P.2d 796 (1943). When determining the application of a law, primary considerations should be given to the plain ordinary meaning of the words. … In Re: Certification of Questions of State Law, 560 P.2d 195 (Okl. 1977); Ridley Packaging Co. v. Holliday, 467 P.2d 480 (Okl. 1970).

Morristown Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. Town of Morristown

20 N.J. Misc. 113 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 17, 1942

Borough of Neptune City v. Freehold Firemen’s Belief Association, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 733 (State Board, 1939). We there referred to Long Branch Firemen’s Relief Association v. … The foregoing considerations require an affirmance of the assessments and of the judgments of the county board. Judgments accordingly.

Crumble, Mae v. Express Services

2016 TN WC 265 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 8, 2016

Appeals Board Opinion The Appeals Board addressed two issues: first, Express’ contention that this Court erred by applying an incorrect legal standard in addressing medical causation. … In addressing these issues, the Board first noted that this Court primarily focused upon the standard set forth in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06- 0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Ironbound Educational & Cultural Center, Inc. v. City of Newark

8 N.J. Tax 540 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 27, 1986

Princeton University Press v. Princeton Boro., 35 N.J. 209 , 172 A.2d 420 (1963); Christian Research Institute v. Dover, 5 N.J. Tax 376 (Tax Ct.1983). … Recent affirmations of the Boys Club principle are found in New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Monroe Tp., 2 N.J.Tax 371 (Tax Ct.1981) and Paramus Boro. v. Geo.

Mendez, Severiano v. Serra Jackson Automotive, LLC, d/b/a Serra Chevrolet

2016 TN WC 305 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 20, 2016

In light of the Appeals Board holding in Syph v. Food Choice Group, Inc., No. 2015-06-0288, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 18 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 8.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

Opinion No. 77-259 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1978

Louis-San Francisco Railway v. … In the case of Vogel v.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1996

Grand River Dam Authority v. … All agencies, boards, and commissions shall report all reallocation decisions for both classified and unclassified positions and all adjustments to pay grades or salary assignments for classes in the unclassified service

Stallion, Samuel v. TruGreen, L.P.

2017 TN WC App. 11 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 2, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Samuel Stallion ) Docket No. 2016-01-0292 ) v. … Finally, we note that the trial court relied on our decisions in Miller v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., No. 2015-05-0158, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Oct. 21, 2015); Sanker v.

Bankers Indemnity Insurance v. City of Newark

18 N.J. Misc. 523 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 23, 1940

This case was tried and argued as a companion case to American Insurance Co. v. City of Newark, decided by this board simultaneously herewith, 18 N. J. Mis. R. 516. … Commercial Casually Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1937), 119 N. J. L. 94; 194 Atl. Rep. 390 ; Prudential Insurance Co. v. City of Newark (State Board Tax Reports, 1912-1934, p. 41).

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 2005

See Cavin v. … Bd. of County Comm'rs, 33 P.2d 477 , 479 (Okla. 1934) ("the board of county commissioners is a legal entity not dependent upon who happens to fill the offices[;] [i]t is a board and not a collection of individuals").

Hinck v. Township of Wall

3 N.J. Tax 96 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 24, 1981

The very next day, October 20, 1976, the Authority conveyed this same parcel to the Monmouth County Board of Chosen Freeholders and the Monmouth County Board of Recreation Commissioners (referred to jointly as “Monmouth County … The rationale of Andover Tp. v. Kymer was argued by the taxpayer in Wiesenfeld v.

Grabbe v. Carroll County Assessor

1 N.E.3d 233 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 31, 2013

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden to demonstrate that it is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. … See Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 468 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005), review demied.

Bunch v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 9, 2010

Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State.

Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.

228 S.W. 133 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 2, 1921

Co. v. Magee, 92 Tex. 616 , 50 S. W. 1013 . Judge Brown, in the opinion just above quoted, cited a decision of the United States Supreme Court in support of his position. … Co. v. Gibson, 83 S.

Jones v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 13, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

Opinion No. (1987) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 1987

CITY COUNCIL OR OTHER GOVERNING BODY OF ANY CITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ANY TOWN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ANY TOWNSHIP . . . TO FURNISH, FOR A CONSIDERATION ANY MATERIAL OR SUPPLIES FOR THE USE OF SAID . . . … BOARD HAD NO OTHER BUSINESS OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE SELLER.

Murillo, Said Omar Jemenez v. Leonard Sams and Associates

2019 TN WC 108 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 17, 2019

Peters v. Mitchell d/b/a A Clean Connection, LLC, 2016 TN Wrk. Camp. App. Bd. LEXIS 7, at *8-9 (Feb. 8, 2016). … Employee v.

In re Zupsic

893 A.2d 900 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2006

See, Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988); Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v. Snyder, 514 Pa. 142 , 523 A.2d 294 (1987). … In Disciplinary Counsel v.

In re the Estate of Kelly

144 Misc. 330 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 19, 1932

It is a general principle or rule of construction that where a will speaks of the death of a devisee without issue it refers to such death occurring during the lifetime of the testator. ' (Brown v. Gardner, 233 N. … Y. 261 ; Lawrence v. Calam, 236 id. 168; Fowler v. Ingersoll, 127 id. 472; Vanderzee v. Slingerland, 103 id. 47; Quackenboss v. Kingsland, 102 id. 128.)

Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Smith

222 S.W. 1099 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 23, 1920

Co. v. Brown, 241 U. S. 223 , 36 Sup. Ct. 602, 60 L. Ed. 966 . Moreover, the jury found that defendant in error was not guilty of contributory negligence, and this renders the error, if any, harmless.