Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.94s
4 Dem. Sur. 145 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1885
Ch., 375; Andrews v. Partington, 3 Brown, C. C., 60; Buckworth v. Buckworth, 1 Cox Eq. Cas., 80; Holtzman v. Castleman, 2 McArthur, 555; Tompkins v. Tompkins, 18 N. J. Eq., 393 ; McKnight’s Exr’s v. Walsh, 23 N. J. … Eq., 136; Harring v. Coles, 2 Bradf., 353 ; Voessing v. Voessing, 4 Redf., 364 ; Brown v. Casamajor, 4 Ves. Jr., 498; Matter of Burke, 4 Sandf. Ch., 617, and cases cited in note).
Cited 0 timesPublished151 Misc. 2d 530 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jul 26, 1991
Riso is a sponsor of the condominium and an officer of its board of directors. Mr. Riso commenced this action on behalf of the board and certain unit owners of the condominium. … Riso and the condominium board in this action. That firm also represents Mr.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1969
City of Duncan ex rel Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System v. Barnes, Okl. 293 P.2d 590 (1956). … Article V , Section 55 Oklahoma Constitution.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJuboori, Mohammed v. PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF TENNESSEE
2020 TN WC 91 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 10, 2020
Shepherd v. Haren Constr. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Mr. Juboori offered no medical opinion to rebut Dr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 Misc. 3d 766 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 22, 2008
of New York, 1 NY3d at 210 ; Matter of Miller v Board of Assessors, 91 NY2d at 86 ). … Board of Assessors, 91 NY2d 82 [1997], supra)] . . .
Cited 5 timesPublishedJack Nissim & Sons, Inc. v. Bordentown Township
10 N.J. Tax 464 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 25, 1989
In Clearview Gardens v. … Brunetti v. New Milford Boro. (App.Div.1989) (slip opinion at 12).
Cited 7 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1979
Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of Muskogee v. Templeton, 184 Okl. 281 , 86 P.2d 1000 (1939). In that connection, we may look to the context of the statutes as in aid to construction. … "(c) * * * Each funeral conducted within the State of Oklahoma must be under the personal supervision and presence of a duly licensed funeral director or an assistant funeral director who holds a valid license from the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedWallis, Jeff v. Baptist Memorial Hospital
2021 TN WC 208 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 30, 2021
Baptist cited Foster v. … See Carr v. Borchers, 815 S.W.2d 528, 532 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGillum, Mary v. Dollar General Corp.
2020 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 26, 2020
Panzarella v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *14 (May 15, 2017). Here, the Court finds Dr. Garside’s opinion regarding Ms. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHale, Sherry v. Prime Package & Label, LLC
2015 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 16, 2015
Manor, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Health & Env't, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)). … Whitesell v. Moore, No. M2011-02745-COA-R3-CV, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 894, at *10 (Tenn. Ct. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarlson, Jennifer v. First Call Temporary Services
2023 TN WC 70 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 2, 2023
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Jennifer Carlson, ) Docket No. 2022-06-1626 Employee, ) v. … In Garcia Carillo v. Sanchez Hurtado, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40, at *9-10 (Aug. 16, 2023), the Appeals Board explained involuntary dismissals at this stage of the case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKean, Carma v. NAVION BKE BELLEVUE, LLC
2024 TN WC 46 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 18, 2024
Baumgardner v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 63, at *11 (Oct. 18, 2017). … See Reynolds v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 02S01-9203-CH-00027, 1992 Tenn. LEXIS 620, at *4-5 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChillicothe Gazette v. Chillicothe City Schools
2018 Ohio 5445 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 26, 2018
Thomas v. … The October 13, 2017 letter merely identifies the general title of the matter being handled, notifies the school board that Liberty Mutual had retained the author to represent the board in that matter, gives contact information
Cited 1 timesPublishedCunningham, Donriel v. Southern Steel Supply Co.
2019 TN WC 32 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 21, 2019
Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2018); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedErickson, Thomas v. Federal Express Corp.
2022 TN WC 21 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 1, 2022
Hibbitts v. Royal d/b/a Royal Guttering, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. 3 LEXIS 10, at *6 (Mar. 23, 2021). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFee, Jack v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.
2020 TN WC 9 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 27, 2020
Hadzic v. Averitt Express, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *8 (May 18, 2015) (courts must consider the plain and ordinary meaning of the statutory language when no guiding precedent exists). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished189 Misc. 2d 588 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Nov 21, 2001
Y. v Board of Educ. ( 423 F Supp 647, 649 [SD NY 1976]), the court stated: “The word ‘contempt’ rings fiercely; if its connotations in law included only lay notions like scorn and wilful disobedience, plaintiffs could not … Y., Inc. v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 423 F.Supp 647, 654 (S.D.NY. 1976).” (At 22, col 4.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedPitney v. Property & Franchise of the Central Railroad
20 N.J. Misc. 448 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 4, 1942
State, Colwell, Pros., v. Abbott, 42 N. J. L. 111; Central Railroad of New Jersey v. State Board of Assessors, 48 Id. 148, 278; *452 4 Atl. Rep. 578 ; Williams v. Bettle, 51 N. J. L. 512; 18 Atl. … In the case of Atlantic City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 128 N. J. L. 278; 25 Atl.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1985
Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982). This is to be accomplished by giving terms used in an act, if not specifically defined, their plain, ordinary meaning. … O.S. 1 (1981), and the existence of a contract is dependent, among other things, upon free mutual consent of the parties, and "[s]ufficient cause or consideration." 15 O.S. 2 , 15 O.S. 51 (1981); Powers Restaurants Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished288 S.W. 434 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 1, 1926
W. 816 ; Foster v. Ross, 33 Tex. Civ. App. 615 (writ refused) 77 S. W. 990 ; Simmons Hdw. Co. v. Adams (Tex. Civ. App.) 147 S. W. 1196 ; and Bergman Produce Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ, App.) 156 S. … Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna