Case law

Quarles, Keith v. FedEx Ground

2018 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 7, 2018

.: 2017-08-1170 Employee, ) v. ) FedEx Ground, ) State File Number: 39797-2017 … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Woodard, Denny v. Freeman Expositions, LLC

2021 TN WC 147 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 16, 2021

Williams v. Saturn Corp., No. M2004-01215-WC- R3-CV, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 1032, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Nov. 15, 2005). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1981

OPINION — AG — (1) UNDER ARTICLE V , SECTION 54 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, PERSONS PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED TO PRACTICE SOCIAL WORK WHO DO NOT MEET THE NEW REQUIREMENTS OF HOUSE BILL NO. 1901 CODIFIED AS 59 O.S. 1250 [ 59-1250 ] … IN 59 O.S. 1250 [ 59-1250 ] CITE: 59 O.S. 1261 .1 [ 59-1261.1 ], OPINION NO. 80-285, ARTICLE V, SECTION 54 (PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS, REPEAL OF STATUTE — EFFECT) (KAY HARLEY JACOBS)

Ferrell, Michael v. Wade Norris Logging, LLC

2020 TN WC 59 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2020

These findings are important because the Appeals Board has held that “an employee’s assessment as to his or her own physical condition is competent testimony that is not to be disregarded.” Limberakis v. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 1998

Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980) (citations omitted). ¶ 2 The Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Act is found at 74 O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1997, §§ 1801 -1892. … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 , 1358 (Okla. 1977).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1978

OPINION — AG — THE PROMULGATION OF REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE PROFESSIONAL AND ETHICAL CONDUCT OF THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION IS WITHIN THE DELEGATED REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF THE OKLAHOMA BOARD OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY; TO … IN LIGHT OF THE `OHRALIK V.

Davis & Associates, L.L.C. v. Stafford Township

18 N.J. Tax 621 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 22, 2000

City of Camden v. Block 21, Lot 214, 11 N.J.Tax 88 (App.Div.1989) and Centorino v. … Stores Co. v. Bor. of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985); Hovbilt, Inc. v. Howell Tp., 138 N.J. 598 , 651 A.2d 77 (1994); Danis v.

Stewart, Michael v. Don Kennedy Roofing

2019 TN WC 174 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2019

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). At an expedited hearing, he must show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Estate of Winburn

14 Misc. 2d 950 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 5, 1958

The testatrix had another sister Bertha Brown who was not named in the residuary clause and who also predeceased her, leaving two children who have filed objections to the account on the ground that there has been an intestacy … Under these circumstances, the legacies clearly lapsed and pass as in intestacy because of the rule prohibiting the establishment of a residue upon a residue (Wright v. Wright, 225 N. Y. 329 ). The will is so construed.

Horizon Adirondack Corp. v. State

88 Misc. 2d 619 · New York Court of Claims · Oct 21, 1976

348, the APA was required to file the official map at its headquarters, file a certified copy thereof with the Secretary of State, and file reasonable facsimiles thereof with the Adirondack Park Local Government Review Board … In Dahl v City of Palo Alto ( 372 F Supp 647 ) and Brown v Tahoe Regional Planning Agency ( 385 F Supp 1128 ) Federal courts held that allegations that land use control statutes effected inverse condemnations of private property

MILLER BEACH INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Department of Local Government Finance

872 N.E.2d 710 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 22, 2007

872 N.E.2d 710 (2007) MILLER BEACH INVESTMENTS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE. Nos. 49T10-0602-TA-14, 49T10-0602-TA-15, 49T10-0602-TA-16. In the Indiana Tax Court. August 22, 2007. … The final determinations of the Indiana Board are Affirmed.

Mullis, Sr., Phillip v. Blount County Community Action Agency

2019 TN WC 116 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 30, 2019

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). For his hernia claim, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1979

, the following question: May a district court clerk who has tendered his unconditional resignation to take effect in the future withdraw the resignation after it has been filed with the County Clerk and accepted by the Board … The decision rendered in Rogers v. Carleton, supra, and the authorities cited therein, is dispositive of your question.

City of Jersey City v. Trustees of Congregation Anshei Sfard

20 N.J. Misc. 212 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 12, 1942

See Board of Education of West Paterson v. Brophy (Court of Chancery, 1919), 90 N. J. Eq. 57; 106 Atl. Rep. 32 ; Hewitt v. Camden County (Circuit Court, 1929), 7 N. J. Mis. R. 528; 146 Atl. Rep. 881 ; Mills v. … Mitsch v. Owens (Court of Chancery, 1913), 82 N. J. Eq. 404; 89 Atl. Rep. 292 ; Atlantic City v. Gardner (Court of Chancery, 1938), 124 N. J. Eq. 110; 199 Atl. Rep. 724 ; Fuchs v. Syndicate Realty Co.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 25, 1979

See State v. White, Okl. 39 P.2d 69 (1934). … It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that the Board of County Commissioners is directed to purchase a blanket bond in such amount as set by the District Judge.

McDougald v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2021 Ohio 2407 · Ohio Court of Claims · May 17, 2021

[Cite as McDougald v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2021-Ohio-2407.] … As stated in Brown v.

Turnage, Clarence v. Dole Refrigerating Co., Inc.

2020 TN WC 26 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 19, 2020

White v. McBride, 937 S.W.2d 796, 800 (Tenn. 1996). … Corp. of Tenn., Inc. v. Hohenwald Bank and Trust Co., 703 S.W.2d 133, 136 (Tenn. 1986).

Ottanio, Donna v. Quality of Life Home Care, LLC

2016 TN WC 200 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 14, 2016

Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015). … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review

In re the Estate of Evans

135 Misc. 656 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 28, 1929

(Doctor v. Hughes, 225 N. Y. 305 ; Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Company, 162 App. Div. 607 ; Gage v. Irving Bank & Trust Co., 222 id. 92.) Mary R. Evans is still alive and while living she can have no next of kin. … (Dwight v. Fancher, 245 N. Y. 71 ; *658 Reynolds v. Reynolds, 224 id. 429; Brown v. Quintard, 177 id. 75.)

Randall, Wilma v. Food Lion and Delhaize America, Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 47 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 16, 2023

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … Thomas v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co., 812 S.W.2d 278, 283 (Tenn. 1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). We review such determinations for an abuse of discretion. Barnes v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co., No.