Opinion

Ottanio, Donna v. Quality of Life Home Care, LLC

  • 2016 TN WC 200
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Sep 14, 2016
Status
Published
On the bench
Audrey A. Headrick
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.5%

The opinion

FILED

September 14,2016

TN COURTOF

l\ OR..KERS' CO?!.lPl. S.-\.110

C1AD.l5

Time 10 ·28 All

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Donna Ottanio ) Docket No.: 2015-01-0091

Employee, )

v. ) State File No.: 9736 2016

Quality of Life Home Care, LLC, and )

AmTrust Group, ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick

Employer/Carrier. )

)

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on

August 30, 2016, for hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the

employer, Quality of Life Home Care, LLC. Attorney Ellie Boles, counsel for Quality of

Life, appeared. The employee, Donna Ottanio, appeared for the hearing, but she did not

file a response to the motion.

Procedural History

Ms. Ottanio filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on November 24, 2015,

seeking benefits in relation to a gastrointestinal bleed allegedly related to a work-related

right-knee injury. The parties did not resolve the disputed issues through mediation, and

the mediator filed a Dispute Certification Notice (DCN) on January 25, 2016. The Court

held a Show Cause Hearing on April 20, 2016, due to the failure to file a request for a

hearing within sixty days of the filing of the DCN. After the Court granted Ms. Ottanio

additional time to request a hearing, Ms. Ottanio subsequently filed a Request for

Expedited Hearing, and the Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on May 16, 2016.

Following the hearing, the Court issued an Expedited Hearing Order Denying Requested

Medical Benefits on June 10, 2016, holding Ms. Ottanio did not come forward with

sufficient medical evidence from which the Court could determine she is likely to prevail

on the merits at trial in proving she sustained a compensable right-knee injury. Ms.

Ottanio did not appeal the Court's decision. Quality of Life then filed the instant Motion

1

for Summary Judgment on July 26, 2016.

Findings of the Court

Motions for summary judgment are governed by Tennessee Code Annotated

section 20-16-101 (20 15) and Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Rule 56.03 requires

that a motion for summary judgment "be accompanied by a separate concise statement of

the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue for

trial." Aside from Rule 56, in 2011, the Tennessee General Assembly codified the

burden of proof applicable to a motion for summary judgment filed by a party who does

not bear the burden of proof at trial as follows:

In motions for summary judgment in any civil action in Tennessee, the

moving party who does not bear the burden of proof at trial shall prevail on

its motion for summary judgment if it:

(I) Submits affirmative evidence that negates an essential

element of the nonmoving party's claim; or

(2) Demonstrates to the court that the nonmoving party's

evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element

of the nonmoving party's claim.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2015); Payne v. D and D Electric, No. 2014-01-0023,

2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 21, at *7-8 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

May 4, 2016).

The nonmoving party must "demonstrate the existence of specific facts in the

record which could lead a rational trier of fact to find in favor of the nonmoving party."

Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

With the passage of Tennessee Code Annotated section 20-16-101 and reexamination of

the summary judgment standard in Rye, the burden falls to the nonmoving party to

produce evidence to establish the essential elements of the nonmoving party's claim in

response to the motion for summary judgment. "The focus is on the evidence the

nonmoving party comes forward with at the summary judgment stage, not on

hypothetical evidence that theoretically could be adduced ... at a future trial." !d. at 265

(emphasis added). Therefore, in this case, Quality of Life's Motion for Summary

Judgment requires Ms. Ottanio to submit evidence establishing the essential elements of

her workers' compensation claim.

The Court finds Quality of Life prevails on both procedural and substantive

grounds. Ms. Ottanio failed to file any response to Quality of Life's Motion for

Summary Judgment as required by Rule 56.03 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure

2

(2015) and Rule 4.02 of this Court's Practice and Procedures (2015). Although Ms.

Ottanio appeared at the hearing, she failed to come forward with any evidence that would

"demonstrate the existence of specific facts in the record which could lead a rational trier

of fact to find in favor of the nonmoving party." !d. Therefore, the Court finds Quality

of Life's motion unopposed.

Accordingly, this Court grants Quality of Life's Motion for Summary Judgment,

and hereby dismisses Ms. Ottanio's claim with prejudice.

This Court taxes the court costs to Quality of Life pursuant to Tennessee

Compilation Rules and Regulations Rule 0800-02-21-.07 (2015). Further, Quality of Life

shall prepare and submit a Statistical Data Form for this matter within ten calendar days

of the date of judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this the 14th day of September, 2016 .

.JlldgeAUdr' · Headrick

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

Right to Appeal:

Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Compensation Order

Granting Motion for Summary Judgment to appeal the decision to the Workers'

Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal your case to

the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Compensation Hearing Notice of Appeal."

2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within thirty calendar days of the

date the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Compensation Hearing Order.

3. Serve a copy of the Compensation Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing

party.

4. The appealing party is responsible for payment of a filing fee in the amount of

$75.00. Within ten calendar days after the filing of a notice of appeal, payment

must be received by check, money order, or credit card payment. Payments can be

made in person at any Bureau office or by United States mail, hand-delivery, or

3

other delivery service. In the alternative, the appealing party may file an Affidavit

of Indigency, on a form prescribed by the Bureau, seeking a waiver of the filing

fee. The Affidavit of Indigency may be filed contemporaneously with the Notice

of Appeal or must be filed within ten calendar days thereafter. The Appeals Board

will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying

the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is practicable.

Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency in

accordance with this section shall result in dismissal of the appeal.

5. The party filing the notice of appeal, having the responsibility of ensuring a

complete record on appeal, may request, from the Court Clerk, the audio recording

of the hearing for the purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court

reporter and filing it with the Court Clerk within fifteen calendar days of the filing

of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, the party filing the

appeal may file a joint statement of the evidence within fifteen calendar days of

the filing of the Compensation Hearing Notice of Appeal. The statement of the

evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of what transpired in the

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and must be approved by the workers'

compensation judge before the record is submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals

Board. See Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-22-.03 (20 15).

6. After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk

transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be

docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review. At that time, a

docketing notice shall be sent to the parties. Thereafter, the parties have fifteen

calendar days to submit briefs to the Appeals Board for consideration. See Tenn.

Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-22-.02(3) (2015).

To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the

Compensation Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules

of Appellate Procedure. If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals

Board, this Order will become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after

entry, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(c)(7).

4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Compensation Order Granting

Motion for Summary Judgment was sent to the following recipients by the following

methods of service on this the 14th day of September, 2016.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:

Mail Fax Email

Donna Ottanio, X X 208 Hughes A venue

Self-represented Cleveland TN 3 7312

Employee dottanio@hotmail.com

Fred Baker, X fbaker@wimberlylawson.com

Attorney

Ellie Boles, Attorney X eputman@wimberlylawson.com

Employer's

Attorneys

enny S urn, Clerk of Court

Court o orkers' Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

5

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.