Case law

Lambert, Steven Kelly v. The Roberts Company

2016 TN WC 228 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 4, 2016

As to the standard of proof applicable at an Expedited Hearing, the Appeals Board held in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9- 10 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. … In Brees v. Escape Day Spa & Salon, No. 2014-06-0072, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 5, at 17-8 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

Vilbig Bros. v. City of Dallas

91 S.W.2d 336 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1936

City of Galveston, 92 Tex. 454 , 49 S.W. 575 ; Kelly v. Cochran County (Tex.Com.App.) 82 S.W.(2d) 641 ; Bush v. City of Denton (Tex.Civ.App.) 284 S.W. 251 , writ of error ref. In Limestone County v. … City of Baltimore v. Flack, 104 Md. 107 , 64 A. 702 ; City of Baltimore v. Gahan, 104 Md. 145 , 64 A. 716 ; Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. Detroit, 26 Mich. 263 .

Harris, David v. Provide Staffing Services, LLC

2020 TN WC 95 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 25, 2020

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Specifically, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Holland v. Harris County

102 S.W.2d 196 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 10, 1937

The constitutionality of this article was upheld in the case of Jones v. Alexander, supra. … judges who were not members of such a board; and not as mere additional compensation paid t.o such judges for services as members of the juvenile board.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 21, 1964

OPINION — AG — IN VIEW OF THE PLAIN MEANING AND INTENT OF THE PERTINENT STATUTES AND IN VIEW OF THE FURTHER WELL RECOGNIZED RULE THAT A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CAN EXERCISE ONLY SUCH POWERS AS ARE CONFERRED UPON IT … BY THE CONSTITUTION OR STATUTES OF THE STATE OR SUCH AS MAY ARISE BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION FROM AN EXPRESS GRANT OF POWER, LAIRMORE V.

Blankenship, Roma v. Ballad Health

2020 TN WC 55 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 16, 2020

.: 2019-02-0171 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 21230-2019 BALLAD HEALTH, ) Self-Insured Employer. ) Judge: Brian K. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Foster v. Andy Frain Services, Inc.

2019 TN WC App. 10 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 5, 2019

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). … Johnson v. Midwesco, Inc., 801 S.W.2d 804, 806 (Tenn. 1990); Payne v. UPS, No. M2013-02363-SC-R3-WC, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 1112, at *18 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Dec. 30, 2014); Bass v.

Ottanio, Donna v. Quality of Life Home Care, LLC

2016 TN WC 200 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 14, 2016

Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015). … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 1995

Irwin v. … Irwin v. Irwin, 433 P.2d at 934 . See also Gordon v.

Smith, Timmy Ray v. La-Z-Boy, Inc.

2017 TN WC App. 49 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 31, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Timmy Ray Smith ) Docket No. 2017-01-0003 ) v. … See Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-02-0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App Bd. LEXIS 14, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Grimes, Kimberly v. YRC, Inc.

2020 TN WC 121 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 20, 2020

See Thomas v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 812 §.W.2d 278, 283 (Tenn. 1991) (“Medical causation and permanency of an injury must be established in most cases by expert medical testimony.”’). Here, neither Dr. Garside nor Dr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Ledford, George v. Mid Georgia Courier, Inc.

2018 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 4, 2018

Lund felt he had no additional treatment options 2 See, e.g., Duignan v. Stowers Machinery Corp., No. 2017-03-0080, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 25, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. May 29, 2018); Ogden v. … Thomas v. Aetna Life and Cas.

Burton, Darnell v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water

2019 TN WC 105 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 12, 2019

Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(C)-(D); Miller v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40, at *13 (Oct. 21, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1979

Barnes v. Transok Pipeline, Okla., 549 P.2d 819 (1976). Furthermore, where the performance of a statutory requirement is mandatory there can be no compliance except in accordance with the particular provision. Oldham v. … Thus, a board of County Commissioners is authorized to make such finding of vacancy and shall formalize their findings by order or resolution.

Ferrell, Michael v. Wade Norris Logging, LLC

2020 TN WC 59 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2020

These findings are important because the Appeals Board has held that “an employee’s assessment as to his or her own physical condition is competent testimony that is not to be disregarded.” Limberakis v. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. 70-233 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1970

In the case of Brown v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1963

OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR ANY ONE YEAR " AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 1 OF HOUSE BILL NO. 823, SAID BOARD MUST COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SAID BILL. … CITE: 59 O.S. 1961 427 [59-427] ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (FRED HANSEN)

Davis & Associates, L.L.C. v. Stafford Township

18 N.J. Tax 621 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 22, 2000

City of Camden v. Block 21, Lot 214, 11 N.J.Tax 88 (App.Div.1989) and Centorino v. … Stores Co. v. Bor. of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985); Hovbilt, Inc. v. Howell Tp., 138 N.J. 598 , 651 A.2d 77 (1994); Danis v.

People v. Miller

19 Misc. 3d 457 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Feb 21, 2008

(Matter of Rayshawn D., supra-, People v Brown, supra.) … (Compare Brown v State, 127 Wis 193, 106 NW 536 [1906] [complainant’s failure to resist her rapist to the utmost of her physical abilities required the reversal of defendant’s conviction] and People v Yanik, 55 AD2d 164,

Stewart, Michael v. Don Kennedy Roofing

2019 TN WC 174 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2019

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). At an expedited hearing, he must show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.