Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • Lagel. Imad v. Elwood Staffing Services, LLC

    2018 TN WC 185 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 20, 2018

    See United Serv’s Inds., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mutters, Kenny v. Safety National Casualty Corp.

    2024 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 4, 2024

    In fact, the Appeals Board gave implicit approval to these types of letters or medical questionnaires at the expedited hearing stage in McKim v. Stansell Electric, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Appeals Board has held that “a decision to award attorneys’ fees and expenses at an interlocutory stage of a case should be made only in extremely limited circumstances.” Travis v. Carter Express, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1980

    OPINION — AG — MONEY DEPOSITED INTO THE GENERAL FUND BY THE STATE BOARDS, AGENCIES AND COMMISSIONS MUST BE SUBJECTED TO THE APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 55 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. … MONEY COLLECTED OR RECEIVED BY THE STATE BOARDS, AGENCIES AND COMMISSIONS AS RELATES TO UNRESTRICTED FEDERAL FUNDS MUST BE DEPOSITED IN THE GENERAL FUND AND APPROPRIATED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 55 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-152 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1968

    In Southern Surety Co. v. Equitable Surety Co., 84 Okl. 23 , 202 P. 295 , the Oklahoma Supreme Court cited Chatham Real Estate Improvement Co. v. … Southern Surety Co., v. Equitable Surety Co., supra, also quoted extensively from Green v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mancino, III, Dominic v. City of Westmoreland

    2022 TN WC 14 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 10, 2022

    See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … See Hawes v. McLane Co., Inc., 2021 TN Wrk Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *10 (Aug. 25, 2021).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sebel v. Williams

    88 Misc. 2d 411 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 19, 1976

    Sampson, 237 NY 69 ; Matter of Oneida Park v First Nat. … (State Trust Co. v Casino Co., 5 App Div 381 ; Matter of Ehrsam, 37 App Div 272 ; Despard v Churchill, 53 NY 192 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Slater, Ronnie v. ADECCO USA, Inc.

    2025 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 20, 2025

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1988

    Heavens v. … Bragdon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 1980

    See O'Dell v. Kunkel's, Inc., 581 P.2d 878 , 881 (Okl. 1978). … London Square Village v. Oklahoma County Equalization and Excise Board, 559 P.2d 1224 (Okl. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dallas Hotel Co. v. Davison

    23 S.W.2d 708 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 5, 1930

    S. 1925; City of Whitewright v. Taylor, 23 Tex. Civ. App. 486 , 57 S. W. 311 (writ refused); Moore v. Pierson, 100 Tex. 113 , 94 S. W. 1132 -1134; Bussey v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App.) 276 S. W. 779 ; Mayfield v. Son (Tex. … In this view we are sustained by the following authorities: Ormsby v. Ratcliff, 117 Tex. 242 , 1 S.W.(2d) 1084 ; Bulin v. Smith (Tex. Com. App.) 1 S.W.(2d) 591 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Wright et al. (Tex. Com.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • White, Carole v. Community Care of Rutherford Co.

    2018 TN WC 143 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 7, 2018

    Creasman v. Waves, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 13, at *7 (Apr. 16, 2018). The undisputed facts establish that Ms. … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Paper Co. v. Taxation Division Director

    11 N.J. Tax 147 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 26, 1990

    Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159, 165-166 , 103 S.Ct. 2933, 2940 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 (1983), quoting Exxon Corp. v. … See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes, supra; Exxon Corp. v. Wisconsin Dept, of Revenue, supra; ASARCO, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission, supra; F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation & Rev.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bermudez, Bladimir v. Rick Messina, d/b/a Messina Masonry & Construction, LLC

    2019 TN WC 42 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 11, 2019

    At a Franklin, Tennessee worksite on January 26, 2018, he was carrying bricks across a wooden walk-board when the board broke. He fell roughly fifteen feet, fracturing his left ankle. Mr. … See e.g., Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-342 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1971

    EFFECTIVE DATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION The determination by a city governing board of the completion of a project is conclusive in the absence of any improper action on the part of said board. … There has been a case involving this statute, that case being Interstate Building and Loan Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1980

    In re: Certification of Question of State Law, 560 P.2d 195 (Okla. 1977); Nickkel v. Stifel, Nicolaus Co., Inc., 542 P.2d 1305 (Okla. 1975). … Ridley Packing Company v. Holliday, 476 P.2d 480 , 482 (Okla. 1970). The statutory language found in 10 O.S. 361 [ 10-361 ] and 10 O.S. 362 [ 10-362 ] (1971) is clear.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garcia, Maria Diaz v. Ideal Clamp Products, Inc.

    2020 TN WC 133 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 17, 2020

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO MARIA DIAZ GARCIA, Employee, Docket No. 2019-05-0530 V. Employer, And LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Stanton

    204 Misc. 133 · New York Family Court · Dec 24, 1952

    If it were, “ Priscilla’s ” father’s marriage to her mother would be void for his lack of legal capacity to contract another marriage (Caldwell v. Caldwell, 298 N. Y. 146 ; Querze v. Querze, 290 N. … Capaldo v. Capaldo, 263 App. Div. 984 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1980

    OPINION — AG — (1) THE OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE CAN CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF A MUNICIPAL FIREMEN'S RELIEF AND PENSION FUND TO TRANSFER THEIR RESERVE FUND TO A NEWLY CREATED STATE FUND. (2) THE OKLAHOMA … 36, 11 O.S. 1977 Supp., 49-101 [ 11-49-101 ], 11 O.S. 1977 Supp., 59-102 [11-59-102] (JOHN PAUL JOHNSON) ARTICLE V, SECTION 36, ARTICLE V, SECTION 41, ARTICLE V, SECTION 36, ARTICLE V, SECTION 41, ARTICLE X, SECTION 15

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Payne, Tracy v. D and D Electric

    2014 TN WC App. 6 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 17, 2014

    Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)). … Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Qian v. Zheng

    2025 NCBC 49 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 22, 2025

    Qian v. Zheng, 2025 NCBC 49. … Todd Brown A. Todd Brown Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.