Case law

Dudley v. Heney

Massachusetts Land Court · Sep 10, 2021

Board of Appeals of Billerica, 454 Mass. 374 , 381 (2009), which in turn quotes Pendergast v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, 331 Mass. 555 , 558 (1954), "[j]udicial review of a zoning board's decision pursuant to G. … L. c. 40A § 17; Pendergast v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, supra at 558-559.

Ridley, Theralease v. Mature Care of Standifer Place, LLC

2024 TN WC App. 25 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 9, 2024

The briefing requirements for the Appeals Board are contained in the regulations governing the Board, and Employer’s brief complied with those requirements. See Tenn. Comp. … Myers v. Amisub (SFH), Inc., 382 S.W.3d 300, 308 (Tenn. 2012).

In Re Newbridge Bancorp S'holder Litig.

2016 NCBC 87 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 22, 2016

v. … See, e.g., Corwin v. British Am.

Handel v. City of New York

64 Misc. 2d 182 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Sep 15, 1970

Satterlee v. Board of Police, 75 N. Y. 38 ; Quayle v. City of New York, 278 N. Y. 19 ). Since the statute is in derogation of the common law it must be strictly construed herein. … The Board of Aldermen upon recommendation of the Board of Estimate attempted to reduce the salary.

Opinion No. 77-244 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1977

In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … West v.

Opinion No. 71-266 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1971

In Board of Education of City of Drumright v. … The case of Board of Education of City of Drumright v.

Walker v. N.C. D.O.T.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 8, 2004

See Guyton v. Board of Transportation , 30 N.C. App. 87 , 226 S.E.2d 175 (1976). … See Guyton v. Board of Transportation , 30 N.C.

Webb, Margie v. Blakeford Management Services, Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 44 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 15, 2023

Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015). Trial courts have broad discretion to address discovery disputes. See Johnson v. Nissan, N.

Braun v. Toledo Corr. Inst.

2011 Ohio 3857 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 21, 2011

Henderson v. … See Abdussatar v. Mansfield Corr. Inst., Ct. of Cl. No. 2007-09429-AD, 2008-Ohio-3419, State v. Brown, 156 Ohio App. 3d 120, 2004-Ohio- 558.

City of Amarillo v. Stapf

101 S.W.2d 229 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 3, 1937

Galanty & Alper v. City of Maysville, 176 Ky. 523 , 196 S.W. 169 ; City of Maplewood v. Provost (Mo.App.) 25 S.W.(2d) 142 , 143. … Little Rock v. Pfeifer, 169 Ark. 1027 , 277 S.W. 883 .

Opinion No. 75-264 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1975

See Board of Education Independent School District No. 1 v. Clendenning, Okl., 431 P.2d 382 (1967) and Board of Education of Dependent School District No. 32 v. … Oklahoma State Board of Education, Okl., 521 P.2d 390 (1974).

Carter, Paulette v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

2020 TN WC App. 33 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 6, 2020

Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

Holder, Tyrone v. Kyowa America Corp.

2016 TN WC 185 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 10, 2016

In light of 1 the Appeals Board holding in Syph v. Food Choice Group, Inc., No. 2015-06-0288, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 18 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

Haigler v. Contract Core Drilling Sawing Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 16, 2001

Walston v. … Although it is a case involving disease accelerated by an injury by accident rather than by occupational disease conditions, Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib.

39 Grant Property Holdings, LLC v. Framingham Clinton Street, LLC

Massachusetts Land Court · Oct 25, 2021

FRAMINGHAM CLINTON STREET, LLC, MISC 17-000285, MISC 18-000334 39 GRANT PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. … LLC; FRAMINGHAM 4 BISHOP, LLC; and SEAN WILDER, JENNIFER DONNARUMA, and WHITNEY SULLIVAN, as Trustees of RESIDENCES AT DENNISON TRIANGLE PHASE I CONDOMINIUM TRUST, Defendants; 39 GRANT PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v.

Department of Revenue v. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons, P.C.

15 Or. Tax 284 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 5, 2001

FSLIC v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 389, 391 (1990). … Subsection (1) indicates that appeals under the section are from “other than an order of the board” whereas subsection (3) states that an appeal “under this section is from an order of the board.”

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 14, 1992

See Donovan v. Walton, 609 F.Supp. 1221 (D.Fla. 1985); Whitfield v. … Accord Lynch v. J.P.

Barbary-Smith, Shanika v. Hendrickson USA, LLC

2020 TN WC 132 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2020

Berdhnik v. Fairfield Glade Cmty. Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *11 (May 18, 2017). While lay testimony is helpful, it is insufficient to prove causation without expert medical evidence. Scott v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1989

THE TERM "INDIRECT INTEREST", SUCH AS USED IN ARTICLE V, SECTION 23, HAS SIMILARLY BEEN VERY LIBERALLY CONSTRUED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THROUGH THE YEARS. … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN THE CONTRACT

Opinion No. (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975

JURY SERVICE — TEACHERS A board of education may not adopt a policy granting to a teacher who serves on a jury leave with pay reduced by the amount received for jury service. … that the constitutionality of an Alabama statute requiring employers to pay employees serving as jurors their usual compensation less that received as jurors was recently upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Dean v.