Case law

Goldberg v. Zellner

235 S.W. 870 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 21, 1921

Mitchell v. Marr, 26 Tes. 330. … Ketterer v. Nelson, supra; Smyley v. Reese, 53 Ala. 89 , 25 Am. Rep. 598 .

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1974

THE LANGUAGE OF 19 O.S. 410 .8 [ 19-410.8 ] CONTEMPLATES A PAYMENT TO THE SHERIFF TO VENDORS FOR ITEMS USED IN BOARDING PRISONERS AND SUBSEQUENT REIMBURSEMENT BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS UPON SUBMISSION OF A PROPER … TO THAT EXTENT, THE LEGISLATIVE ABROGATES THE LANGUAGE OF `BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, TULSA COUNTY V. MARS, SHERIFF', RELATING TO PROFITS REALIZED BY THE SHERIFF.

Opinion No. 69-106 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1969

O.S.L. 1963, ch. 325 , Art. 2, Section 226 ( 63 O.S. 1 -226 [ 63-1-226 ] (1968)): "The County Board of Health shall annually file with the county excise board an estimate of needs for the operation or maintenance of the County … See Madeley v. Trustees of Conroe Independent School Dist. Tex., 130 S.W.2d 929 (1939).

HANDS, DERRICK v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC

2026 TN WC 11 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 19, 2026

Blevins v. S. Champion Tray, LP, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *14 (July 11, 2019). Further, an aggravation injury could cause the need for medical treatment without an anatomical change. Edwards v. … Hagan v. Potomac Corp., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 5, at *10 (Feb. 9, 2022).

Opinion No. 73-222 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1973

[ 59-805 ] (1971), and is otherwise qualified and passes the examination given by the Oklahoma State Board of Electrology, is entitled to a license to practice electrology in Oklahoma. … Under the rule of statutory construction announced in McVicker v.

Hancock, Jurine v. Federal Express Corp.

2018 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2018

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 20 15). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Convention Headquarters Hotels, LLC v. Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Aug 16, 2019

); accord Sellars v. … . § 1983” (citation omitted)); Kellogg v.

Oteey, Eddie v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company

2022 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 5, 2022

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (March 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Thrower v. Brownlee

12 S.W.2d 184 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929

Eor this conclusion the court cites Kennedy v. Bender, 104 Tex. 149 , 135 S. W. 524 ; Wolff v. Cohen (Tex. Civ. App.) 281 S. W. 646 ; Texas Harvester Co. v. Wilson Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 574 , and Gardner v. … See Loper v. Robinson, 54 Tex. 514 ; Wortman v. Young (Tex. Com. App.) 235 S. W. 559 ; Dow-lin v. Boyd (Tex. Com. App.) 291 S. W. 1095 ; Dibrell v. Bank (Tex. Giv. App.) 293 S. W. 874 ; Dossett v. Franklin, etc,, Co.

Greenough v. Deblinger

84 Misc. 2d 463 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 10, 1975

(Metzger v Metzger Press, 276 App Div 936 , affd 301 NY 781 ; Matter of McCarthy v Heinz Co., 2 AD2d 908 , mot for lv to app den 2 NY2d 708 ; Calhoun v West End Brewing Co., 269 App Div 398 .) … The Workmen’s Compensation Board does not seem to question the service performed by plaintiffs’ attorneys or the amount of the disbursements.

Rosenthal v. Walsh

69 Misc. 2d 612 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 6, 1972

S. 2d 328), dismissal even after 20 years of service (Spitalnik v. City of New York, 56 Misc 2d 183 ), or resignation (Ricker v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 196 N. Y. S. 2d 17). Decisions such as Grossman v. … No. 3 [Board of Educ.] (34 A D 2d 351), where a collective bargaining agreement mandated the differing result. Konig v.

Continental Oil Co. v. City of Wichita Falls

42 S.W.2d 236 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 14, 1931

In Marshall v. City of Dallas (Tex. Civ. App.) 253 S. … In City of Dallas v. McElroy (Tex. Civ. App.) 254 S.

Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Borough of Edgewater

23 N.J. Misc. 199 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 5, 1945

In the ease of Lehigh and Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. Junction, 75 N. J. L. 922, 927; 68 All. … And in the case of State, Lehigh and Wilkesbarre Coal Co., Pros., v.

Township of Jackson v. Hamburger

2 N.J. Tax 430 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 27, 1981

Rothman v. Hackensack, 1 N.J.Tax 438 (Tax Ct. 1980). *436 In Andover Tp. v. … Wiesenfeld v. S.

Qualls, Steven v. Federal Mogul

2022 TN WC 85 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 8, 2022

Dorsey v. Amazon.com, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Estate of Hitchins

4 Mills Surr. 290 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1904

Smith v. Edwards, 88 N. Y. 92 . It is important to understand the reason for this rule and we find it very clearly stated in Dougherty v. Thompson, 167 N. … Y. 391 ; Goebel v. Wolf, 113 id. 405 .

Lee, Chevis v. PAE Holdings Corp.

2025 TN WC 54 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 11, 2025

Burns-Herrera v. State Indus., LLC, 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 37, at *17 (Sept. 12, 2022). … Caskey v. Powers Pizza, LLC, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 37, at *9 (Oct. 7, 2015). Mr.

Farmer, Joseph v. Five Star Building Group, LLC

2025 TN WC App. 26 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 30, 2025

See Discover Bank v. Morgan, 363 S.W.3d 479, 487 (Tenn. 2012). Moreover, this Board does not have the authority to consider facial challenges to the constitutionality of any statute or regulation. Worrell v. … Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 125 (1990) (quoting Daniels v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 10, 1966

THAT IS, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE RULING IN BOWES V. … THE BOARD'S DISCRETION SHOULD BE EXERCISED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGAL PRINCIPLES ANNOUNCED HEREIN, AND IN THE ATTACHED OPINIONS.

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Cable

123 Misc. 894 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 6, 1924

Cook v. White, 43 App. Div. 388 ; affd., 167 N. Y. 588 ; Matter of Emmons, 110 App. Div. 701 ; Matter of Johnson, 105 Misc. Rep. 451 ; affd., 188 App. Div. 954 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. … Bloodgood v. Lewis, 209 N. Y. 95, 103 ; Van Cortlandt v. Kip, 1 Hill, 590 ; Brown v. Riggin, 94 Ill. 560 ; Manship v. Stewart, 181 Ind. 299 ; Crosbie v. MacDoual, 4 Ves. Jr. 610; Green v. Tribe, L. R., 9 Ch.