Opinion

Qualls, Steven v. Federal Mogul

  • 2022 TN WC 85
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Dec 8, 2022
Status
Published
On the bench
Brian K. Addington
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Dec 08, 2022

12:19 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

STEVEN QUALLS, ) Docket No. 2022-02-0451

Employee, )

v. )

FEDERAL MOGUL, ) State File No. 800994-2002

Employer, )

And )

INDEMNITY INSURANCE ) Judge Brian K. Addington

COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, )

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING MEDICAL BENEFITS

Decision on the Record

Mr. Qualls sought an order that Federal Mogul furnish medical benefits for an

alleged back injury. Federal Mogul disputed the back condition arose primarily out of and

in the course and scope of employment. The Court holds Mr. Qualls did not introduce any

medical evidence proving that his condition arose out of and in the course and scope of his

employment and denies the requested medical benefits.

Claim History

Mr. Qualls alleged a work injury to his back while picking up a heavy box on June

24, 2022.1 After his shift, he went to the emergency room because his pain worsened. The

emergency room doctor documented the history provided: “The onset was [sic] past two

weeks, gradually worsening. Type of injury: none. The location where the incident

occurred was at home. . . . [S]tates he lifts heavy objects at work and felt worsening pain

today.” He received an injection for the pain, and the doctor released him with light-duty

restrictions with instructions to follow up with his primary doctor. Mr. Qualls notified his

supervisor, who told him to obtain more specific restrictions from his doctor.

1.

Mr. Qualls’s Petition for Benefit Determination listed the injury date as June 25, 2022. Later, he realized

the injury happened on June 24 instead.

Four days later, Mr. Qualls saw his primary provider, nurse Jennifer Dyer. She

noted the following in her records:

Pain continues and is radiating down leg did not schedule with [orthopedist]

so will refer to neurosurgeon based on symptoms. [He] tells me he is unsure

really how it happened. States he thought he blew his back out but unsure

how. He does work at an auto parts store and does a lot of lifting.

Later, Ms. Dyer documented in an office memo that Mr. Qualls never told her or

the emergency room doctor that he injured his back at work. She wrote that she would not

change anything in her records and recommended he contact someone else. Further, Ms.

Dyer completed a questionnaire stating that Mr. Qualls’s back pain was not primarily

related to a work injury..2

In August, Federal Mogul provided a physician panel from which Mr. Qualls

selected; however, it is unknown whether he ever saw the selected physician.

In September, Mr. Qualls sought unauthorized treatment with Dr. Jeffrey Peterson,

an orthopedic surgeon. In his office note, Dr. Peterson wrote, “He states that while at work

in June he bent over and picked up a heavy box and felt pain in his back.” Dr. Peterson

noted his physical findings from the examination but did not address any future care,

prescribe medications, suggest any options for Mr. Qualls’s treatment, or state whether his

pain was caused by the alleged work injury.

In addition to medical proof, the parties submitted affidavits of Mr. Qualls and two

of his supervisors, Victor Stewart and John Kleinschmidt. Mr. Qualls’s affidavit described

lifting a heavy box on June 24 and having back pain. The affidavits of Mr. Stewart and

Mr. Kleinschmidt stated that Mr. Qualls did not report an injury or say that his work

restrictions were due to a work injury. The two supervisors also stated the first time they

learned of his workers’ compensation claim was after Mr. Qualls filed the Petition for

Benefit Determination.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Qualls must present sufficient evidence to show he is likely to prevail at a final

hearing. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2022). He has not done so.

To meet this burden, Mr. Qualls must show to a reasonable degree of medical

2

Nurses,cannot offer- causation opinions. Dorsey v. Amazon.com, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS

13, at *9 (May 14, 2015).

2

certainty that lifting the box at work contributed more than fifty percent in causing the need

for his medical treatment, considering all causes. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(12).

Here, Mr. Qualls submitted no medical proof that he injured his back at work on

June 24, 2022. Instead, the records show he sought treatment for back pain that started at

home two weeks before the alleged work injury. Further, the office note of Dr. Peterson

only recites the history provided by Mr. Qualls. It does not address whether his current

symptoms are primarily related to the alleged injury. Therefore, the Court holds Mr. Qualls

is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to benefits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Qualls’s request for medical benefits is denied.

2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on January 31, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. Central

Time. The parties must call (855) 543-5044. Failure to call may result in a

determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED December 8, 2022.

/S/ Brian K. Addington

__________________________________

Brian K. Addington, Judge

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

Appendix

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Steven Qualls

2. Employee’s Choice of Physician Medical Panel

3. Wage Statement

4. Declaration of Victor Stewart

5. Declaration of John Kleinschmidt

6. Medical records-Ascension Saint Thomas

7. Medical records-The Health Group of McMinnville

8. Questionnaire

9. Medical records of Dr. Jeffrey Peterson

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Request for Expedited Hearing

4. Employer’s Expedited Hearing Brief

5. Employer’s Expedited Hearing Exhibit List

4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as indicated on December 8, 2022.

Name Mail Email Service sent to:

Christopher Markel, X cmarkel@markelfirm.com

Employee’s Attorney jdickey@markelfirm.com

Chris Rowe, X cgrowe@mijs.com

Employer’s Attorney

_____________________________________

Penny Shrum, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

5

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.