Case law

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Gray

10 Mills Surr. 398 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1913

Mount v. Tuttle, 183 N. Y. 358 . … Murray v. Miller, 178 N. Y. 316 ; Matter of Durand, 194 N. Y. 477 .

Toney v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2010 Ohio 6613 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 27, 2010

[Cite as Toney v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010-Ohio-6613.] … Brown Gerald Toney Emily M.

McLeod, Kamden v. Valet Guys of Knoxville, LLC

2024 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 13, 2024

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Brick Associates v. Township of Brick

4 N.J. Tax 510 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 5, 1982

appraisal is prepared for use before the county board. … Under the circumstances, the presumption of correctness has not been overcome and the court cannot disturb the assessment fixed by the county board judgment. [Schmertz v.

Erwin, Joe v. BT REDI MIX, INC.

2020 TN WC 118 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 17, 2020

To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Opinion No. 79-267 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1979

The contract to purchase the property would be subject to the provisions of 62 O.S. 371 [ 62-371 ] (1971), which provides: "No board of county commissioners, nor city council, nor board of trustees of any township, or town … NOTE: CONFLICT OF INTEREST) ** Disposition : **NOTE: OVERRRULED BY: STATE V. HILLCREST INVESTMENT CORPORATION **

Mary Annette, LLC v. Crider

2025 NCBC 23 · North Carolina Business Court · May 13, 2025

Mary Annette, LLC v. Crider, 2025 NCBC 23. … Heath v. Turner, 309 N.C. 483, 488 (1983); see also N.C.G.S.

Opinion No. 80-255 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1980

The State Board shall maintain separate accounts for each municipality and each firefighter." … In Wallace v. Childers, 180 P.2d 1005 (Okl. 1947), the Supreme Court of Oklahoma stated: ". . .

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 1991

MUNICIPAL OFFICERS MAY BE APPOINTED TO CERTAIN BOARDS, 51 O.S. 6 (5)/ 51 O.S. 6 (6) BUT THEY CANNOT BE ELECTED TO A SCHOOL BOARD. … NO. 80-172; GIBSON V. CROWDER, 165 P.2D 628 (OKLA. 1946). I ALSO NOTE THAT YOUR CONSTITUENT IS ADVOCATING A CHANGE IN THE LAW WHICH WOULD ALLOW SUCH DUAL-OFFICE HOLDING.

Opinion No. 70-169 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1970

The Attorney General has had under consideration your recent letter wherein you, in effect, ask the following question: What is the maximum legal number of board members who may serve on the governing board of a private, … Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System v. Barnes, Okl., 293 P.2d 590 (1956).

119 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Berkhout

134 Misc. 2d 963 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 18, 1987

Tenants sought and obtained a stay pending the outcome of a proceeding before the Loft Board to determine interim multiple dwelling coverage. At the end of a lengthy hearing, the Loft Board decided in favor of tenants. … Joint Venture v Litchman ( 126 Misc 2d 1049 ).

Hayes, Gupton v. Elmington Property Mgmt.

2021 TN WC 215 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 16, 2021

The Court continued the Compensation Hearing until the Appeals Board remanded the case. … Watson v. City of Jackson, 448 S.W.3d 919, 926 (Tenn. Ct.

Segal v. State

79 Misc. 2d 529 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 16, 1974

(Miller v. Board of Educ., Union Free School, Dist. No. 1, Town of Albion, 291 N. Y. 25 ; Govel v. Board of Educ. of City of Albany, 267 App. Div. 621 , supra.) … Brittan v. State of New York, 200 Misc. 743 .) Shelli was not required or authorized to use the saw. (Johnson v. Board of Educ. of City of Hudson, 210 App. Div. 723, 725 .)

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. City of Perth Amboy

9 N.J. Tax 571 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 24, 1988

While defendant argues, citing Gehin-Scott v. … Props, v.

Green v. East Orange

21 N.J. Tax 324 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 28, 2004

[Cassini v. Orange City, 16 N.J.Tax 438, 450-53 (1997).] … See also Pi-Con, Inc. v. A.J. Anderson Const.

Clauberg v. State

19 Misc. 3d 942 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 4, 2008

The few published cases to address the issue have applied the period of limitations applicable to a cause of action for unintentional tort (Court of Claims Act § 10 [3]), albeit without discussion (Brown v State of New York … In so holding, the court acknowledges that the Third Department held otherwise in Brown v State of New York (supra) and Bhagalia v State of New York ( 228 AD2d 882 [1996]).

Abdulrahaman v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility

2009 Ohio 7099 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 17, 2009

[Cite as Abdulrahaman v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility, 2009-Ohio-7099.] … Brown Abdul Abdulrahaman, #487-773 Emily M. Simmons Southern Ohio Correctional Facility Assistant Attorneys General P.O.

Sanders, Brandy v. NORTHSHORE HEIGHTS ASSISTED LIVING

2025 TN WC 42 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 10, 2025

Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017). … See Williamson v. Prof. Care Servs., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1994

YORK V. TURPEN, 681 P.2D 763 (OKL. 1984). … SWART V. STATE, 720 P.2D 1265, 1270 (OKL.CR. 1986). "(T)HE DISCRETIONARY DISCHARGE OF A SENTENCE IS A MATTER SOLELY FOR THE GOVERNOR, UPON RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD." ID., AT 1271.

Opinion No. 76-118 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1976

In the many opinions issued subsequent to the April 8, 1944, opinion and the Supreme Court ruling in State v. … This result was found to be in accordance with the provisions and intent of 51 O.S. 24 [ 51-24 ], and State v. Nix, supra.