Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.75s
VELASQUEZ, BAUDILIO v. BROTHERS CONSTR.
2025 TN WC 87 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 4, 2025
COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS BAUDILIO VELASQUEZ (Deceased), ) Docket No. 2021-08-0835 Employee, ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished13 Misc. 3d 331 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 29, 2006
Ct, D Mass 2004]; Hargrave v Brown, 783 So 2d 497, 499-501 [La Ct App 2001]). … Adopting the standard set forth by the Louisiana court in Hargrave v Brown, Magistrate Judge Wall held that the party seeking to compel DNA testing must establish a prima facie showing of the reasonable possibility of a match
Cited 5 timesPublished19 Abb. N. Cas. 413 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1887
That section was evidently suggested to the Code Commissioners by decisions *417 heretofore rendered in Wood v. Brown ( 34 N. Y. 337 ) and in Burt v. Burt ( 41 N. Y. 46 ). In Wood v. … The case was like the case at bar, and unlike that of Wood v. Brown, in the circumstance that no question was made respecting the safety of the fund involved or the responsibility of its custodian.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDerrick, Rosalind v. Optum Services, Inc.
2022 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 13, 2022
Hawes v. McLane Co., Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *14 (Aug. 25, 2021). … The facts in this case are similar to Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32 (May 18, 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 OK AG 3 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 2024
Board of Pharmacy on the Physician Assistant Drug Formulary. 59 O.S.2021, § 519.6(E)(1). … 2000 OK AG 34, Question Submitted by: Lyle Kelsey, Executive Director, Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision Cited Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1939 OK 467, 97 P.2d 58, 186 Okla. 217, CASE v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1976
The State Board of Public Affairs is authorized to use brand names in taking competitive bids. … After recognizing that certain constitutional agencies may be exempt from the Act under the authority of Trapp v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKhalaf v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 20, 2009
Stat. § 97-2 ; Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 , 499 S.E.2d 197 (1998). *Page 8 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 (1998). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublished36 Misc. 3d 736 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 18, 2012
If there is any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue, the motion for summary judgment must be denied (Hantz v Fishman, 155 AD2d 415 [1989]). … Therefore, according to the TSP Investment Board, it was legally bound to pay Ms. Gagliano the proceeds of the federal benefits.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSilver v. Queens College of City University
63 Misc. 2d 186 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 12, 1970
On June 23, 1969 the Board of Higher Education passed a resolution increasing the fees at all units of the City University. … This matter may be distinguished from Drucker v. New York Univ. ( 59 Misc 2d 789 ) in that here the defendant (educational institution) has breached the contract rather than the student (plaintiff).
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1994
The key case for Oklahoma regarding released-time programs is Lanner v. Wimmer, 662 F.2d 1349 (10th Cir.1981). … Perry v. School Dist. No. 81, 344 P.2d 1036 (Wash. 1948).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1980
governing said school district, and for all other purposes approved by the State Board of Education. … See Vette v. Childers, 102 Okl. 140 , 228 P. 145 (1924).
Cited 0 timesPublished162 Misc. 2d 203 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 17, 1994
Appeals of the rulings of the Chief Administrator went to a Classification Review Board (Review Board). (See, Matter of Association of Secretaries to Justices v Office of Ct. Admin., 75 NY2d 460 .) … Clerks Assn. v Himber, Sup Ct, NY County, Jan. 27, 1988.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 1968
Title 70 O.S. 7 -6 [70-7-6] (1961) was construed by our Supreme Court in the case of High Hill Rural Development Club v. Great American Ins. … In the case of Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978
This provision of our Constitution was construed in the case of Board of Equalization of Tulsa County v. … As can be seen, no where in the statute is the State Board of Public Affairs given control over litigation. As was noted in State ex rel. Nesbitt v. Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1979
The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board (hereafter the "Board") is authorized to contract for a claims administrator to process claims arising under the several group insurance plans. … See Wells v. Childers (Okl. 1945) 165 P.2d 371 , 376 . An additional consideration is whether a contract may be let which tends to bind the State of Oklahoma to an agreement to expend future fiscal year funds.
Cited 0 timesPublished55 S.W.2d 1030 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 22, 1932
Brown v. Fore (Tex. Com. App.) 12 S.W. (2d) 114 , 63 A. L. R. 435. … The situation is controlled by the same principle as were the cases of Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 , 34 S. Ct. 578 , 58 L. Ed. 828 ; General Ry. Signal Co. v. Virginia, 246 U. S. 500 , 38 S. Ct. 360 , 62 L.
Cited 9 timesPublished2016 TN WC App. 70 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 13, 2016
) Appeal from the Court of Workers’ ) Compensation Claims ) Robert V. … Hensley delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. Heather H.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1970
In Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917), our Supreme Court held that a superintendent of schools was not a public officer. It said: ". . . . … The Court then quoted approvingly from Olmstead v. Mayor, 42 N.Y.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBlank, Robert J. v. Estes Express Lines
2021 TN WC 248 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 8, 2021
Blank’s assertion, Estes contended these facts are consistent with the Appeals Board’s statement in Nickerson v. Knox Co. Gov’t, 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In another case involving an acute injury, the Appeals Board found the employee could not toll the statute of limitations by claiming he was unaware of the full extent of the injury. Johnson v. Stanley Convergent Secr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSumo Property Management, L.L.C. v. City of Newark
21 N.J. Tax 522 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 18, 2004
Accordingly, “a complaint in lieu of prerogative writs involving a county board of taxation judgment must be filed with the Law Division of the Superior Court.” Hernandez v. West New York, 18 N.J. … City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc., 210 N.J.Super. 315, 327 , 509 A.2d 808 (App.Div.1986); see also Fraser v. Township of Teaneck, 1 N.J. 503, 507 , 64 A.2d 345 (1949); Tumulty v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna