Case law

In re the Estate of Purvey

34 Misc. 2d 913 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 3, 1962

v. … The use of the word balance in this manner is of real significance (Matter of Matthiessen, 175 Misc. 466 ; Matter of Brown, 82 N. Y.

Opinion No. 77-301 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978

Railroad Company v. State, 119 P. 117 (1911). Statutes must be reasonably and sensibly construed in preference to construction which renders all or part of the statutes useless. Tannehill v. … It is also apparent that with the authority vested in said Board by the Legislature, by virtue of 82 O.S. 934 [82-934](c), it is incumbent upon the Board to take action when it discovers that pollution abatement programs

Passaic Street Realty Assoc., Inc. v. Garfield City

13 N.J. Tax 482 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 2, 1993

Reading these cases together with Hackensack Water v. Woodcliff Lake, 9 N.J.Tax 545 (Tax 1988) and Abe Schrader v. Secaucus, 8 N.J.Tax 390 (Tax 1986), as well as F.M.C. Stores v. … Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Closter, supra. *488 2.

YARBOUGH, JERRY v. TRUEBLUE, INC.

2025 TN WC 36 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 16, 2025

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2024); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If TrueBlue meets this burden, Mr. … The Appeals Board noted that the list of documents to consider for summary judgment in Rule 56.04 does not include “medical records, standing alone.” Sadeekah v. Abdelaziz, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Painter, Terry v. Hollingshead Development, LLC

2026 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 8, 2026

Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 8, at *17 (Feb. 14, 2018). … See Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Ryan v. Hudson

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 12 · New York Marine Court · May 15, 1880

That the action of the board of education was legal, and that when the defendant, as the legal representative of the board, ordered the plaintiff to leave, she should have submitted to his demand. … That her unlawful refusal to vacate gave the board and its officers power to remove her, and to exercise whatever force was necessary to effect the removal (See Haywood v. Miller, 3 Sill, 90).

DI YAN, JIAN v. NENG YUAN LAN d/b/a CHINA KING,

2025 TN WC 16 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 8, 2025

Materials Corp. v. Britt, 211 S.W.3d 706, 711 (Tenn. 2007). Without a physician’s opinion, Mr. Yan did not prove his claim. Therefore, the Court grants China King’s motion for involuntary dismissal, as Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

HERNANDEZ, RICARDO v. CARLOS LOPEZ d/b/a EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE

2026 TN WC 57 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 5, 2026

Wright v. Tenn. CVS Pharmacy, LLC, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 72, at *12 (Oct. 31, 2019). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Hackney Mfg. Co. v. Celum

221 S.W. 577 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 19, 1920

Plaintiff sent its agent, Brown, to make the test. … Pryor v. Jolly, 91 Tex. 86 , 40 S. W. 959 ; Gravely v. Southern Ice Machine Co., 47 La. Ann. 389 , 16 South. 866 ; Garnhart v. Rentchler, 72 Ill. 535 ; Restein v.

Tower West Apartment Ass'n v. Town of West New York

2 N.J. Tax 565 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 25, 1981

The assessment and the county board action thereon were: County Board Assessment Judgment Land $ -0- $ -0- Improvements 466,800 405,000 Total $466,800 $405,000 Defendant seeks no further review of the county board judgment … . *574 Plaintiff has failed to meet its burden of overcoming the presumptive correctness attending the county board judgment. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99 , 89 A.2d 385 (1952).

Le, Man Thai v. Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems, Inc.

2024 TN WC 58 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 13, 2024

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). As a threshold issue, Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Kubic v. Audette

Massachusetts Land Court · Feb 11, 2021

In support of their request, the Plaintiffs rely principally on Brown v. … Quoting Baxendale v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1988

The degree of authority granted to these various other boards of regents varies tremendously from board to board, even as among the constitutionally authorized boards, and no attempt is made here to examine such differences … Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 (Okla. 1966). Legislative silence, when it has authority to speak, may be considered as giving rise to an implication of legislative intent. City of Duncan v.

BRAULIO J. HERNANDEZ RAMOS v. TEJ PRAMUKH HOSPITALITY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a ECONO LODGE

2025 TN WC 27 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 14, 2025

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2022); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If TEJ does either or both, Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

In re Fletcher

1 Misc. 2d 25 · New York Family Court · Jan 11, 1955

(Garlock v. Garlock, 279 N. Y. 337 ; Haas v. Haas, 298 N. Y. 69 ; Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 278 App. Div. 446 ; Horowitz v. Horowitz, 197 Misc. 260 .) … 623 ; Helman v.

19 W. 36th Holding Corp. v. Parker

193 Misc. 2d 519 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 9, 2002

(Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258 [1st Dept 1999]; Pirrelli v Long Is. R.R., 226 AD2d 166 [1st Dept 1996].) … The Appellate Division, First Department, specifically held in 902 Assoc. v New York City Loft Bd. (supra) that the Loft Board’s interpretation of its own regulations should be upheld if not irrational or unreasonable.

Nextsun Energy LLC v. Fernandes

Massachusetts Land Court · Feb 22, 2021

Dugout, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of Canton, 375 Mass. 25 , 31 (1970). … Iodice v. Newton, 397 Mass. 329 , 333 (1986); see Colangelo v. Board of Appeals of Lexington, 407 Mass. 242 , 247 (1990).

In re the Estate of Thompson

36 Misc. 2d 638 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 4, 1962

However, the status of the board is not only that of a creditor, but also that of an assignee. … Y. 629 ; Edwards v. Sullivan, 200 Misc. 488 ).

In re Shaw

192 A.3d 350 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2018

On November 1, 2016, the Board filed a Board Complaint against Respondent Shaw in the Court of Judicial Discipline (CJD). In re Shaw, 5 JD 2016. 219. … On September 9, 2016, the Board had not yet filed the Board Complaint against Respondent Shaw and therefore the charged conduct was not public knowledge. 224. Robin M.

Rakowsky v. Excelsior 57th Corp.

167 Misc. 2d 476 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 25, 1995

(Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268 [1977].) … Sales v United Trade Co., 191 AD2d 310 [1st Dept 1993]; Matter of Podolsky v Narnoc Corp., 149 Misc 2d 839 , revd in part 196 AD2d 593 [2d Dept 1993]; Southbridge Towers v Rovics, 69 Misc 2d 333 , revd 76 Misc 2d 396 [App