Case law

Opinion No. 79-041 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1979

Such powers and duties are identical to many of the powers and duties of a school board and must be regarded as the exercise of "some portion" of the sovereignty of government. Guthrie Daily Leader v. Cameron, supra. … Edmondson v. State ex rel. Phelps, 533 P.2d 604 , 616 , (Okl. 1975). Under the language of Gibson v.

Clapa v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · May 21, 2012

Jeffrey Brown (Brown), Real Property Appraiser, Multnomah County Oregon, Division of Assessment, Recording & Taxation, appeared on behalf of Defendant. … Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor, TC–MD No 020869D, WL 21263620, at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)).

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1985

Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982). Clearly, then, on its face the Open Meeting Act is applicable to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College. See , 70 O.S. 4423 , supra. … However, we find no such exception with regard to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College.

BOYZO, JESUS ARROYO v. SOL CONSTRUCTION

2026 TN WC 13 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 24, 2026

Hodges v. Tenn. Att’y Gen., 43 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). Still, dismissal is normally appropriate only where there has been a “clear record of delay or contumacious conduct.”2 Shahrdar v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Singleton

24 S.W.2d 26 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 12, 1930

Singleton in due time and manner presented her claim for compensation on account of the death of her son to the State Industrial Accident Board; that said board made an award in favor of the claimant, from which' award both … Co. v. Washington, 94 Tex. 510 , 63 S. W. 534 ; Montrief v. Bragg (Tex. Com. App.) 2 S.W.(2d) 276 ; Rosenthal, etc., v. Hillebrandt (Tex. Com. App.) 7 S.W. (2d) 521 ; Russell v. Bailey (Tex. Civ. App.) 290 S. W. 1108 .

Ancona v. Metcalf

120 Misc. 2d 51 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 11, 1983

Assoc. v Salle (NYLJ, March 11, 1983, p 12, col 2). … Loft Board Regulations On April 11, 1983 the Loft Board promulgated “Coverage Regulations Pursuant to Section 281 of Article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law.”

Shaw v. Cumberland Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 20, 2005

Page or any other agent of the Cumberland County Board of Education was negligent in the operation of the bus or that Ms. Page's actions were in any way a contributing cause of the accident. 7. … Stat. § 143-300.1 ; Huff v. Northampton County Bd. of Educ., 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963). 2. The evidence presented in this case regarding the actions of Ms.

Hazzard v. Phillips

17 Mills Surr. 417 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 2, 1916

In consequence of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in 1911, in the case of Standard Oil Co. v. United States ( 221 U.

Clapa v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · May 21, 2012

Jeffrey Brown (Brown), Real Property Appraiser, Multnomah County Oregon, Division of Assessment, Recording & Taxation, appeared on behalf of Defendant. … Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor, TC–MD No 020869D, WL 21263620, at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)).

Trenton Lodge No. 105 v. City of Trenton

18 N.J. Misc. 513 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 23, 1940

E. v. City of Hoboken (State Board), filed February 21st, 1939; affirmed, Hoboken v. Hoboken Lodge No. 74, B. P. O. E. (Supreme Court, 1939), 123 N. J. L. 506; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 783. … Borough of Red Bank (State Board), filed January 24th, 1939; Fifty-Six Seminary Avenue Corp. v. City of Rahway (State Board), filed April 4th, 1940.

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2008

of Nursing, to order, select, obtain and administer legend drugs, Schedules II through V controlled substances, devices, and medical gases only when engaged in the preanesthetic preparation and evaluation; anesthesia induction … The Board may terminate the authorization granted to a CRNA as follows: d.

Opinion No. 49-0509 Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1949

** LUMP SUM APPROPRIATIONS — STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ** HE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HAS VOTED TO APPROPRIATE A LUMP SUM TO THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS TO BE USED BY SAID BOARD … — AFFIRMATIVE (GOVERNOR'S CONTINGENCY FUND) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (FRED HANSEN)

McGill v. Department of Revenue

14 Or. Tax 40 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 6, 1996

She did not appeal the 1991-92 assessed value to the board of equalization or to the board of ratio review. … The information later submitted showed that taxpayer had appealed the 1993-94 value to the county board of equalization.

Mult. Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

8 Or. Tax 422 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 13, 1980

It further states that the Board of County Commissioners shall prescribe the functions of such administrative departments of the county and that the board, by majority vote, may change the functions of any of the departments … As this court wrote in Dept. of Rev. v.

Jackson Construction Co. v. Township of Ocean

182 N.J. Super. 148 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 25, 1981

Miller v. … Greenberg v. Owens, 31 N.J. 402, 405 (1960); Hodgson v. Applegate, 31 N.J. 29, 37 (1959).

Question Submitted by: Ashley Plyushko, Executive Director, Oklahoma Accountancy Board

2025 OK AG 16 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 4, 2025

See 18 O.S.2021, § 802 See Sanders v. … See , e.g. , Rickard v.

FLOWERS, NICOLE v. APCOM

2026 TN WC 92 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2026

She also accused counsel of unethical behavior and threatened her with a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility. Ms. … Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 647 (Tenn. 2008). Ms.

Rossi v. Upper Pittsgrove Township

12 N.J. Tax 235 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 3, 1992

. *241 Pantasote Co v. Passaic City, 100 N.J. 408, 417 , 495 A.2d 1308 (1985). In support of its position that a temporary cessation of farming constitutes a change in use, the taxing district cites Hamilton Township v. … Turnpike Auth. v. Washington Tp. 137 N.J.Super. 543 , 350 A.2d 69 (App.Div.1975), aff’d o.b. 73 N.J. 180 , 373 A.2d 652 (1977).

J. Charles Sheerin v. Michael Schultz, LaPorte County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Dec 11, 2019

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … CODE § 6-1.1-15-4(p) (2019) (indicating that the Indiana Board, as the “trier of fact,” [is to] review the probative value of an appraisal”); Marion Cty. Assessor v.

Freeman, Wayne v. United Road Services, Inc.

2025 TN WC 645 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 14, 2025

Worrell v. Obion Cnty. School Dist., 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *10 (June 29, 2023). The analysis of whether Mr. Freeman is entitled to a new panel begins with the order that Dr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.