Case law

Opinion No. 71-433 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1972

See Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Okl., 349 P.2d 646 (1960); Sebring v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Okl., 401 P.2d 479 (1963). … In County Election Board of Coal County v.

Opinion No. (1991)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1991

City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 , 254 (10th Cir. 1948), citing City of Tulsa v. … Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Stephens County, Excise Board, 312 P.2d 883 (Okla. 1957).

Sharlot v. Sharlot

122 Misc. 2d 350 · New York Family Court · Jan 11, 1984

(Brown v Brown, 32 Ohio App 2d 139; see French v Department of Social Servs., 92 Mich App 701 ; Meadows v Meadows, 619 P2d 598 [Okla].) … (Hisquierdo v Hisquierdo, supra, at p 581.)

Lindsay, Tre'Bion v. State Industries, LLC

2023 TN WC App. 2 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 19, 2023

Weaver delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge Pele I. Godkin joined. … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). However, as explained by the Court of Appeals, 5 Pursuant to Tenn. Comp.

Bass River Township v. Hogwallow, Inc.

1 N.J. Tax 612 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 24, 1980

In Andover Tp. v. … In Weisenfeld v.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the United States Trust Co.

2 Mills Surr. 367 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1901

United States Trust Co. v. Tobias, 21 Abb. N. C. *370 392 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 N. Y. 244 .

Smith v. N.C. Motor Speedway

1997 NCBC 5 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 12, 1997

SMITH v. N.C. … See United Telephone Company of the Carolinas, Inc. v. Universal Plastics, Inc., 287 N.C. 232, 236, 214 S.E.2d 49, 52 (1975); Board of Light and Water Commissioners v. Parkwood Sanitary District, 49 N.C.

Little v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2020 Ohio 7016 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 20, 2020

As stated in Brown v. … Brown, 10th District No. 13AP-804, 2014-Ohio-1810 at ¶ 15.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1968

OPINION — AG — ** DUAL OFFICE HOLDING — SCHOOL BOARD — MEMBERSHIP ** A DENTIST SERVING ON THE SCHOOL BOARD OF NORMAN, OKLAHOMA, MAY NOT ALSO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF REGISTERED DENTISTS BECAUSE OF 51 O.S. 6 [ 51 … -6 ] (SCHOOL BOARD, STATE AGENCY, MEMBERSHIP, DUTIES) CITE: 59 O.S. 327 .1 [ 59-327.1 ], 56 O.S. 6 [56-6], ARTICLE V, SECTION 39, 59 O.S. 327 .52 [59-327.52] (W.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1979

as is reasonably necessary to accomplish the duties of the board." … In determining legislative intention, words, phrases, and expressions will be accorded their ordinary meaning ". . .", Board of Education F.T.C. v. Allen, Okla. 156 P.2d 596 (1945).

Long Island Railroad v. State

185 Misc. 646 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 7, 1945

(Belmar Contracting Co. v. State of New York, 233 N. Y. 289 ; New York Central R. R. Co. v. State of New York, 183 Misc. 815 .) In the Belmar case .(supra) the Court of Appeals held: “ There is a like situation here. … (Dung v. Parker, 52 N. Y. 494.) Had the State of New York refused entirely to execute the contract it incurred no liability. Equally true is this if it merely delays in its *649 execution. (South Boston Iron Co. v.

JONES, BOI ESTON v. v. AMAZON FULFILLMENT CENTER MEM4

2026 TN WC 31 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 30, 2026

Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 19 S.W.3d 770, 776 (Tenn. 2000). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Gazdo Properties Corp. v. Lava

149 Misc. 2d 828 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 3, 1991

(Kaufman & Broad Homes v Albertson, 73 Misc 2d 84, 85 [Sup Ct, Suffolk County 1972].) … The unit owner enjoys "fee simple ownership of [the] unit or apartment” (Gerber v Town of Clarkstown, 78 Misc 2d 221, 222 [Sup Ct, Rockland County 1974]). 2 As an owner in fee simple, the condominium unit owner fits the definition

In re the Estate of Laidlaw

167 Misc. 172 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 17, 1938

(Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U. S. 12 ; Kirtland v. Hotchkiss, 100 id. 491; Blodgett v. Silberman, 277 id. 1; Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota, 280 id. 204; First National Bank v. Maine, 284 id. 312.) … He quoted from Safe Deposit & Trust Company v.

MONROE, JEROME v. KELLOGG COMPANY

2026 TN WC 30 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 30, 2026

Monroe countered with Roper v. Allegis Group, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14 (Feb. 10, 2017), where the Appeals Board said that lack of a valid excuse to follow a safety rule is not necessarily a willful failure. … Giggers v. Memphis Hous. Auth., 277 S.W.3d 359, 364 (Tenn. 2009). Thus, Mr. Monroe is entitled to recover benefits.

Opinion No. 80-078 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1980

Carl v. Board of Regents, supra at 914. … As expressed in Carl v. Board of Regents, supra, and Sanders v. Benton, supra, it is clear that the Open Meeting Act requirements apply to such an association.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1979

The construction of the nepotism statutes and the intent of the legislature, were dealt with in Reddell v. State, 14 Okl. Cr., 199 , 170 P. 273 (1918), wherein the Court said: ". . . … The Court went on to say that the nepotism statutes did not prevent a school board member from issuing a warrant to a part-time employee where such person was related to the member of the board.

In re Purdy

2 Connoly 386 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 15, 1890

Brown, was made her sole legatee and sole executor. … Brown, deceased; by Charles G. Dill, the executor, etc., of Maria Brown, another deceased sister; by Gilbert Brown, the only brother of the said Harriet Brown, and by Effie A. Miller, a niece.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1979

The construction of the nepotism statutes and the intent of the Legislature, were dealt with in Reddell v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 199 , 170 P.273 (1918), wherein the Court said: ". . . … The Court went on to say that the nepotism statutes did not prevent a school board member from issuing a warrant to a part-time employee where such person was related to the member of the board.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 2000

supervising physician and as approved by the State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision after consultation with the State Board of Pharmacy on the Physician Assistant Drug Formulary. … See Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 , 276 (Okla. 1996).