Opinion

JONES, BOI ESTON v. v. AMAZON FULFILLMENT CENTER MEM4

  • 2026 TN WC 31
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Status
Published
On the bench
Marion
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 39.9%

The opinion

FILED

Mar 30, 2026

12:30 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

BOI ESTON JONES, Docket No. 2023-80-3379

Employee,

v.

AMAZON FULFILLMENT State File No. 53533-2024

CENTER MEM4,

Employer,

and Judge Shaterra R. Marion

AMERICAN ZURICH INS. CO.,

Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an expedited hearing on March 18, 2026. Mr. Jones sought

medical and temporary disability benefits for his work injury. Amazon contended

Mr. Jones is presumed to be at maximum medical improvement and not owed

additional temporary disability benefits. It also stated his medical benefits have not

been denied. For the reasons below the Court holds that Mr. Jones is entitled to

ongoing temporary disability benefits and medical treatment.

Claim History

On June 18, 2024, a pile of boxes slammed into Mr. Jones as he attempted to

clear a jam in a box slide at work. He began to feel pain but finished his shift and

returned to work the next day. Mr. Jones usually worked as a picker, which does not

require heavy lifting. The next time his manager required him to do heavier work,

including moving packages, he informed his manager that he could not do so because

of injuries to his back and neck.

Mr. Jones testified that after he reported his injury, Amazon directed him to

see his own doctor for a physician’s report. He saw Dr. Glenn Crosby, who

performed neck surgery on him 20 years ago.

1

When Mr. Jones gave Dr. Crosby’s note to Amazon, it provided a panel. He

selected a hospital, which then referred him back to Dr. Crosby for further

evaluation.

Dr. Crosby ordered a cervical MRI, which showed multilevel degenerative

disc disease and foraminal narrowing. Mr. Jones testified that Dr. Crosby ordered a

discectomy surgery, which Amazon denied. Amazon argued it has not denied any

medical treatment, and neither party provided Dr. Crosby’s records regarding a

surgical recommendation or status of treatment. Dr. Crosby noted that Mr. Jones had

an allergy to androgenic anabolic steroids.

Amazon offered another panel for Mr. Jones’s back injury, and Mr. Jones

selected Dr. Winfred Abrams. Dr. Abrams ordered a lumbar x-ray, which showed

age-related spondylosis and mild degenerative disc disease. He also ordered an MRI,

which showed a large disc bulge.

Dr. Abrams noted that Mr. Jones “reports today that he was told that he had a

steroid allergy and his documentation is specifically androgenic steroid allergy but

there is not any confirmed testing of this.” He recommended Mr. Jones see an

allergist to confirm the diagnosis.

At Mr. Jones’s final visit, Dr. Abrams noted he and Mr. Jones decided not to

do an injection, “which was not necessarily needed.” Dr. Abrams recommended

chronic pain management.

Mr. Jones then selected Dr. Moacir Schnapp from a pain management panel.

At the first visit, Dr. Schnapp observed that Mr. Jones had degenerative disc and

joint disease in his lumbar spine. He added that Mr. Jones “has avoided treating it

because cervical steroid injection in the past caused him to pass out when he got

home after the injection and he needed to be ‘revived.’” Dr. Schnapp then questioned

whether Mr. Jones had a “hypotensive episode or if this was truly an allergy to the

medications.” He documented “no known drug allergies” in his record.

Dr. Schnapp offered an alternative to steroids: a diagnostic medial branch

block followed by radiofrequency ablation, but he noted that Mr. Jones had concerns

about this treatment as well. Ultimately, Dr. Schnapp did not provide any treatment.

He concluded that a chiropractic referral would be a good option, but he had nothing

more to offer Mr. Jones at that time.

2

Lisa Mayfield, the adjuster, testified by affidavit that temporary disability

benefits ended on September 23, 2025.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Jones must prove he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on his

request for benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v.

Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9

(Mar. 27, 2015).

The parties agreed that Drs. Abrams and Schnapp are panel-selected

authorized treating physicians. The parties also agreed that Dr. Crosby is an

authorized treating physician because the hospital, the original authorized provider,

referred Mr. Jones to him. Mr. Jones sought to return to Dr. Crosby.

The Appeals Board explained: “Unless a court terminates an employee’s

entitlement to medical benefits or approves a settlement in which the parties reach a

compromise on the issue of future medical benefits, an injured worker remains

entitled to reasonable and necessary medical treatment causally-related to the work

injury.” Limberakis v. Pro-Tech Sec., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS

53, at *7 (Sept. 12, 2017).

Mr. Jones may therefore return to his authorized treating physicians, including

Dr. Crosby, for his cervical injury.

As to temporary total disability benefits, entitlement to them ends whenever

an employee reaches maximum medical improvement or returns to work. Cleek v.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 19 S.W.3d 770, 776 (Tenn. 2000).

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(1)(E) states that an employee

“shall be conclusively presumed to be at maximum medical improvement when the

treating physician ends all active medical treatment and the only care provided is for

the treatment of pain[.]”

Here, Dr. Abrams referred Mr. Jones to pain management for his back injury.

However, the parties did not present all of Dr. Crosby’s medical records on his neck

injury. The only evidence in the record is Mr. Jones testifying that Dr. Crosby

recommended surgery. Therefore, no evidence suggested that Dr. Crosby has ended

all active treatment or placed Mr. Jones at maximum medical improvement for his

neck injury.

3

In the alternative, Dr. Schnapp recommended a medial branch block followed

by radiofrequency ablation. No evidence shows that this is not active treatment and

only for the treatment of pain. Further, Dr. Schnapp recommended a chiropractor

referral, which suggested all active treatment options have not been exhausted.

The Court finds insufficient evidence to show that Mr. Jones has ended all

active treatment. Therefore, he is likely to show at a hearing on the merits that he is

entitled to continued medical treatment and ongoing temporary disability benefits

from September 24, 2025.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Jones’s request to return to Dr. Crosby is granted.

2. Mr. Jones’s request for temporary total disability benefits is granted. He shall

be paid temporary disability benefits from September 24, 2025, forward at his

compensation rate. His attorney is entitled to 20% of this award as fees.

3. The Court sets a status conference for May 11, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. Central

Time. The parties must call (866) 943-0014 to participate. Failure to call

might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of this Expedited Hearing Order is filed,

compliance with this Order must occur by seven business days of entry of this

Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

ENTERED March 30, 2026.

____________________________________

JUDGE SHATERRA R. MARION

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

4

APPENDIX

The technical record consists of all documents filed on the TNComp

electronic filing system, which the Court considered in reaching its decision.

Exhibits:

1. Medical Records Filed by Employee on March 18, 2026

2. Medical Records Filed by Employer

3. Affidavit of Lisa Mayfield, with Attached Exhibit

4. C-32 Panels selected by Mr. Jones

5. Letter and UPS Label for a Temporary Total Disability Check

6. Wage Statement

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as shown on March 30, 2026.

Name Mail Email Service sent to:

Linda Garner, X lgarner4@comcast.net

Employee’s Attorney

Stephen Morton, X stephen.morton@mgclaw.com

Trent Norris, trent.norris@mgclaw.com

Employer’s Attorneys amber.dennis@mgclaw.com

____________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

6

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

ප Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ ප Motion Order filed on ___________________

ප Compensation Order filed on__________________ ප Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.