Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.01s
Texas Attorney General Reports · May 24, 1988
An example of such reasoning is found in Brown v. Patterson, 609 S.W.2d 287 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1980, no writ). … Walton v. Brownsville Navigation District, 181 S.W.2d 967 , 969 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1944, writ ref'd); Kaufman County Levee Improvement District No. 10 v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1985
Consequently, because the legislature is presumed to be acquaintedwith conditions affecting the subject matter- of legislat,lon, Brown v. Memorial Villages Water Au;oH-;y, ',"',",.;.2d453 ('Iex.Civ. … See Armstrong v. Harris County, 669 S.W.2d Zs23 (Tex. App. - Houston [G Dist.] 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.). p. 1568 Ms. Joyce A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 2006
. §§ 311.021 , .023 (Vernon 2005); Albertson's, Inc. v. Sinclair, 984 S.W.2d 958 , 960 (Tex. 1999); Mitchell Energy Corp. v. Ashworth, 943 S.W.2d 436 , 438 (Tex. 1997). … Crowe, Brown McCarroll, L.L.P., to Honorable Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, at 1 (Oct. 19, 2005) [hereinafter Brown McCarroll Brief] (briefs and letter on file with the Opinion Committee). 10 See Briefs cited, supra
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1997
(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724.) "In so doing we turn first to the statutory language, since the words the Legislature chose are the best indicators of its intent. … Moreover, in O'Brien v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1986
Code, § 1301; Brown v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 52, 55; 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 405, 406 (1984); cf. Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 5 Cal.3d 771, 783; Chambers v. … (Main v. Claremont Unified School Dist., supra, 161 Cal.App.2d at p. 192; Rose v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 1980
Brown: You request our opinion as to whether the board of directors of an industrial revenue corporation, when issuing revenue bonds, may set interest rates for the bonds which vary or float according to certain economic … See also Weisbart Co. v. First National Bank, 568 F.2d 391 (5th Cir. 1978) and Texas Banking Ins. Co. v. Turnley, 61 Tex. 365 , 368 (1884).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1997
We are to interpret statutes so as to effectuate the intent of the Legislature. ( Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co . (1989) 48 Cal.3d 721 , 724 .) … [Citation.]" ( Freedom Newspapers, Inc . v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821 , 826 .) The words of a statute are to be given "their usual and ordinary meaning." ( DaFonte v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 2007
In Godwin v. … City of Port Allen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1982
and possesses a valid Structural Pest Control Business License issued by the board. … -See Brown v. Patterson, 609 S.W.2d 287, 290 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1980, no writ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1983
of employment ended constituted a break in her employment for purposes of the two-year proviso, this office quoted the following statement from Cox v. … Brown, 50 S.W.2d 763, 764 (MO. App. 1932): Continuously in. . . employ does not mean continuously in. . . service.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1987
Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D. M. v. … Rustici v. Weidemeyer, 673 S.W.2d 762 (Mo. banc 1984).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1983
by a school district to rehire a teacher's aide before her current term of employment ended constituted a break in her employment for purposes of the two-year proviso, this office quoted the following statement from Cox v. … Brown, 50 S.W.2d 763 , 764 (Mo.App. 1932): Continuously in . . . employ does not mean continuously in . . . service.
Cited 0 timesPublished60 Op. Att'y Gen. 31 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1971
BROWNE, Executive Director, Coordinating Council for Higher Education You have requested my opinion on numerous questions relative to the powers and duties of the Coordinating Council. … White House Milk Co. v. Thomson (1957), 275 Wis. 243 , 81 N.W.2d 725 . Also see 52 Am. Jur. § 26, Taxpayers' Actions .
Cited 0 timesPublished91 Op. Att'y Gen. 92 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · May 4, 2006
Dear V. … The failed attempt to enact such legislation, while not conclusive on the issue, supports the conclusion that the Board currently lacks authority to provide such benefits. See Comptroller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 2001
Dear Chief Brown: You advise this office that you are the newly elected Chief of Police for the City of Port Allen. … Lentini v. City of Kenner, 211 So.2d 311 (La. 1968) . Our office has recognized this principle in numerous opinions. See Attorney General Opinions 00-96, 00-113, 99-406, and 99-27.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 2007
BROWN JR. Attorney General DANIEL G. STONE Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE PETER MOOCK, COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY OF KINGS, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. … Code, § 6253 [copy of public record to be made upon request]; Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230 , 237-238 ; Board of Trustees v. Judge (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 920 , 927 ; 73 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 13 , 23 (1990).)
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 2007
Caple v. … Caple v. Brown , 323 So.2d 217 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1975). The Act does contain the following provision concerning the confidential nature of certain personnel records within LSA-R.S. 44:11 , which provides: "A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1973
See Hill v. Evans, 414 S. W. 2d b84(Tex. Civ. App., Austin, 1967, ref., n. r. e. ); Whit~eside v. Brown, 214 S. W. 2d .844(Tex. Civ. App. , Austin, 1948, writ dism. ). … See, for example, Articles 7211, 7149, V. T. C. S., and Rowland v. City of Tyler, 5 S. W. 2d 756 (Tex. Comm.App., 1928); Harlingen Independent School Dist. v. Dunlap, 146 S. W. 2d 235 (Tex. Civ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1959
ing the date of such investment; provided, however, that such investment may be increased to as much as fifty (50%) percent of the company’s admitted assets upon advance approval by the Board … Brown, Jr. Tom I. McFarllng REVIEWEDFORTHEATTORNEY GENERAL BY: W. V. Geppert
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2001
Barker v. … See also, on this latter point, Legislative Research Commission v. Brown, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna