Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1982
Status
Published
On the bench
Mark White
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.5%

The opinion

The Attorney General of Texas

December 22, 1982

MARK WHITE

Attorney General

Mr. Charlie Chapman Opinion No. MW-525

Supreme Court Building Executive Director

P.O.BOU 12546

Austin. TX. 76711-2546

Structural Pest Control Board Re: Whether real estate

5121475-2501

of Texas inspector may make termite

Telex 9101674.1367 5555 North Lamar, Building H inspection without licensing

Telecopier 51214750266 suite 123 by Texas Structural Pest

Austin, Texas 78751 Control Board

1607 Main St., Suite 1400

Dallas. TX. 75201-4709 Dear Mr. Chapman:

2141742.8944

You have asked whether individuals who have not complied with the

provisions of the Texas Structural Pest Control Act, article 135b-6,

4624 Alberta Ave.,Suite 160

El Paso. TX. 799052793

may make Inspections of real property for termite infestation.

9151533.3484

Article 135b-6, section 2(a), subsections (1) and (2) provide:

1220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202

sec. 2. (a) For purposes of this Act a person

Houston. TX. 77002.6966

7131650-0666

shall be deemed to be engaged in the business of

structural pest control if he engages in, offers

to engage in, advertises for, solicits, or

806 Broadway, Suite 312 performs any of the following services for

Lubbock, TX. 79401-3479

compensation:

8061747-5238

(1) identifying infestations or making

4309 N. Tenth. Suite B inspections for the purpose of identifying or

McAllen, TX. 76501-1685 attempting to identify infestations of:

5121662-4547

(A) arthropods (insects, spiders, mites,

200 Main Plaza. Suite 400 ticks, and related pasts), wood-infesting

San Antonio, TX. 76205-2797 organisms, rodents, weeds, nuisance birds, and any

5121225-4191 other obnoxious or undesirable animals which may

infest households, railroad cars, ships, docks,

An Equal OpportunityI trucks, airplanes, or other structures, or the

Affirmative Action Employer contents thereof, or

(B) pests or diseases of trees, shrubs, or

other plantings in a park or adjacent to a

residence, business establishment, industrial

plant, institutional building, or street;

p. 1902

Mr. Charlie Chapman - Page 2 (MS-525)

(2) making inspection reports,

recommendations, estimates, or bids, whether oral

or written, with respect to such infestations....

Section 5(a) of the act provides:

No parson, except an individual under the

direct supervision of a certified applicator, may

engage in the business of structural pest control

after the effective date of this Act unless he

meets the standards set by the board and possesses

a valid Structural Pest Control Business License

issued by the board.

The clear meaning of these statutes is that no person may make

structural pest inspections and reports unless the inspector has been

licensed by the Structural Pest Control Board.

Your question arises as the result of the passage of article

6573.a. section 18C, effective August 31, 1981. Section 18C provides

for the registration (not licensing) of the following:

Any person or persons who hold themselves out to

the public as being trained and qualified to

inspect improvements to real property, including

structural items and/or equipment and systems, and

who accept employment for the purpose of

performing such an inspection for a buyer or

seller of real property pursuant to the provisions

of any earnest money contract form adopted by the

commission shall:

(1) register his or her current name, type of

legal entity, mailing address, place of business

or businesses, and business telephone number or

numbers with the commission....

Section lBC(e) states:

It is the intent of the legislature that the

provisions of this section shall not apply to any

electrician, plumber, carpenter. any person

engaging in the business of structural pest

control in compliance with the Texas Structural

Pest Control Act, as amended (Article 135b-6,

Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), or any other

parson who repairs, maintains, or inspects

improvements to real property and who does not

hold himself or herself out to the public via

p. 1903

. .

Mr. Charlie Chapman - Page 3 (MW-525)

personal solicitation or public advertising as

being in the business of inspecting such

improvements pursuant to the provisions of any

earnest money contract form adopted by the

commission.

The meaning of section lBC(e) is clear and is reinforced by

legislative history. Persons engaged in the various building trades,

those licensed by the Structural Pest Control Board, and persons who

repair, maintain or inspect improvements or persons who do not solicit

inspection business are exempted from the requirements of this

statute. All others who hold themselves out as trained or expert to

inspect, and who inspect improvements to real property for a buyer or

seller pursuant to an earnest money contract must register. Section

18C does not create a new agency or provide standards. It merely

requires registration of persons who advertise themselves as

inspectors and who do inspect improvements to real property in

connection with the sale of that real property.

Your question is, essentially, whether section 18C of article

6573a creates an exemption from the Structural Pest Control Act, that

is, whether section 18C permits persons not licensed by the Structural

Pest Control Board to inspect structures for pest infestation. In our

opinion, article 6573a, section 18C does not create an exemption from

the Structural Pest Control Act. The statutes have entirely different

functions. The Structural Pest Control Act is designed to establish

standards for persons licensed under the statute. As a result of

licensing, the board has access to the names and addresses of the

licensees, article 135b-6, section 4(b). Consequently, it is

reasonable that persons licensed are exempt from registration under

article 6573a, section 18C. as duplicative. However, article 6573a,

section 18C is not duplicative of theStrucura1 Pest Control Act. The

statute only requires that certain persons register and post a bond.

Persons who register do not fulfill the requirements of the Structural

Pest Control Act; the act of registration serves only to identify

persons who inspect real property and are not licensed under other

statutes. Article 6573a, section 18C, therefore, is designed to begin

at the point that licensing statutes end. See transcript of Senate

Committee on Economic Development, Senate Bili??o. 478, March 2, 1981.

The public policies and legislative purposes of the statutes are

also different, and should be examined to determine whether a conflict

exists. -See Brown v. Patterson, 609 S.W.2d 287, 290 (Tex. Civ. App. -

Dallas 1980, no writ). The policy for the Structural Pest Control Act

is obvious; it is to protect the public by regulating and requiring

certain standards of those engaged in the business of structural pest

treatment and inspection. The purpose of article 6573a, section 18C

is also clear: registration is an aid to buyers who have been injured

by false or inaccurate reports, so that buyers may locate the real

p. 1904

. .

Mr. Charlie Chapman - Page 4 (MN-525)

estate inspector for restitution. Examined in this light, it is

unlikely that the legislature intended to create an exception to

article 135b-6, and thereby encourage unlicensed persons to register

and avoid the provisions of article 135b-6.

It is our opinion that the two statutes can be read in harmony.

Article 135b-6 is unaffected by article 6573a. section IBC, which

applies to inspections for which a structural pest control business

license is not required.

SUMMARY

Pursuant to article 135b-6, only persons who

possess a valid Structural Pest Control Business

License may inspect and make reports with respect

to structural pest infestations. Section 18C of

article 6573a does not create an exemption to that

requirement.

MARK WHITE

Attorney General of Texas

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.

First Assistant Attorney General

RICHARD E. GRAY III

Executive Assistant Attorney General

Prepared by Patricia Hinojosa

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

Susan L. Garrison, Chairman

Jon Bible

Rick Gilpln

Patricia Hinojosa

Eva Loutzenhiser

Jim Moellinger

p. 1905

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.