Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.89s
Florida Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 2010
Fla. 88-36 (1988) (notice required to be given to the "violator" of a code requires notification to all owners of property owned by more than one person). 12 See Henley v. … McDonald , 971 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), Monroe County v. Whispering Pines Associates , 697 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and City of Gainesville Code Enforcement Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1988
If a member of a pension fund board of trustees is also an officer of a financial institution in which the pension fund board is considering investing money, does a conflict of interest exist for that board member and what … See, Home Fire Insurance Co. v. Benton, 106 Ark. 552 , 153 S.W.2d 830 (1913); Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. W. S. Fox Sons, Inc., 251 Ark. 247 , 472 S.W.2d 766 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublished92 Op. Att'y Gen. 180 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 2007
Criminal Injuries Compensation Board v. Gould , 273 Md. at 514 ; see Maryland Rule 15-701. … board could file a cross-claim against state and county defendants); Cincinnati City School District v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 2004
Raley v. Wagner, 346 Ark. 234 , 57 S.W.3d 683 (2001); Dunklin v. Ramsay, 328 Ark. 263 , 944 S.W.2d 76 (1997). … Stephens v. Arkansas Sch. for the Blind, supra (citing State v. McLeod, 318 Ark. 781 , 888 S.W.2d 639 (1994)). The basic rule of statutory construction is to give effect to the intent of the General Assembly. Ford v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · May 16, 2006
Landry Fire Protection District Number One Fire Board may also serve as the Secretary of the Board. … Finally, you ask if there are members of the Board who are ineligible, what steps are to be taken. In accordance with Lehmann v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Apr 6, 1998
of Public Instruction of Broward County v. … Stat.); Mitchell v. Leon County School Board, 591 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Witgenstein v. School Board of Leon County, 347 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). 4 See, s. 120.54 (8), Fla.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1970
Carpenter v. … and the,Court in that case held that the ordersof the Commissioners Court did not al- low compensation to a member who voluntarily absented him- self from the.meeting of the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2017
Brown Opinion No. … See Turrentine v. Lasane, 389 S.W.2d 336, 337 (Tex. Civ. App-Waco 1965, no writ) (quoting Leonard v. Benford Lumber Co., 216 S.W. 382, 383 (Tex. 1919)); see also Pearson v. Wicker, 746 S.W.2d 322, 322 (Tex.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 2004
Additionally, according to my understanding, the Rule you have alluded to is currently the subject of an action pending in the Pulaski County Circuit Court ( Arkansas Psychology Association v. … Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology (No. 2003-4543)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
T0 B, Warden, Member Opinion No, V-310 State Board of Control Austin, Texas Re : Authority of the Board of Control to collect for … Warden, Page 4, V-310 eSecp 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 2010
Clement: You have requested an opinion of this Office regarding the legality of a lease exchange agreement between Plaquemines Parish School Board ("School Board") and a private entity of a certain tract of land located in … See also Madden, supra , at 232; Papasan v. Allain , 106 S.Ct. 2932 , 2941-2942 (1986); Alabama v. Schmidt , 34 S.Ct. 301 , 302 (1914); Cooper v.
Cited 0 timesPublished70 Op. Att'y Gen. 48 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1981
La Follette v. … Thomson v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 1981
State v. State Board of Equalizers, 94 So. 681 (Fla. 1922); Evans v. Hillsborough County, 186 So. 193 (Fla. 1938). … Cf. also City of Pompano Beach v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 206 So.2d 52 (4 D.C.A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 1993
Mourot v. Ark. Bd. of Dispensing Opticians, 285 Ark. 128 , 685 S.W.2d 502 (1985). … Chism v. Phelps, 228 Ark. 936 , 311 S.W.2d 297 (1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1984
See, e.g., Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. City of Kennett, 78 F.2d 911 , 918-923 (8th Circ. 1935), appeal dismissed in part, Missouri Public Service Co. v. City of Trenton, 80 F.2d 520 (8th Cir. 1935); Stewart v. … See, e.g., Lien v. City of Ketchikan, 383 P.2d 721 (Alaska 1963); State Bank Trust Co. of Richmond v. Madison County, 275 Ky. 501 , 122 S.W.2d 99 (1938); Booth v. City of Owensboro, 274 Ky. 325 , 118 S.W.2d 684 (1938).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1940
Clark v. FInlay, 93 Tax. 171, 54 3. V. 343, 346.* Hon. Tom A. Craven, page 4 Subsequent to the date that the c.a~eof Joues v. Alexadder was passed upon by the Commla- sion of Appeals .or Texan au? … ,110 board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Feb 14, 1997
State v. Wragge , 246 Neb. 864 , 524 N.W.2d 54 (1994); Curry v. State ex rel. Stenberg , 242 Neb. 695 , 496 N.W.2d 512 (1993). … See Gallagher v. City of Omaha , 189 Neb. 598 , 204 N.W.2d 157 (1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
V-204 lte : Power of the Automatic Tax Board, to set an ad valorem tax rate for … Fscd, Article 2823, v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1988
Glover v. Henry, 231 Ark. 111 , 328 S.W.2d 382 (1959). … Additional support for this conclusion is found in Walther v. McDonald, 243 Ark. 912 , 422 S.W.2d 854 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 1980
White v. Crandon, 156 So. 303 (Fla. 1934), and AGO 075-256. … When the right to exercise authority is doubtful, the board should not assume that authority,' citing Hopkins v. Special Road and Bridge District No. 4, 74 So. 310 (Fla. 1917); Accord : State ex rel . Greenberg v. Fla.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna