Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1947
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Hon. Be8uford B. Jester

&wernor of Texas

Austin, Texas Opinion No. V-204

lte : Power of the Automatic

Tax Board, to set an ad

valorem tax rate for

the Available School

Fund except for text

books where suff iclent

money is available in

Dear Governor Jester: the clearance fund.

Your request for opinion dated May 2, 1947.,

reads in part es follows:

“Several authorities have expressed

to me their graqe doubt as to whether, un-

der the provisions of House Bill 301, re-

cently enacted by the Legislature3 the Au-

toutic Tax board can set any ad valorem

tax rate for the Available School Fund, ex-

cept that portion needed for free textbooks.

“This question is raised in relation

to the foll&ing language of the bill:

”t the’re is hereby approprla-

ted, sll&itidj transferred and credited

to the Available School Fund such a sum

which when taken together with the total

of all other statutory and constitutional

amounts to accrue to the Available School

Fund 11111 equal to such a total as may be

needed to pay a Fifky-five dollar ($55)

per .capita . a . .

“The suggest ion tide to me is that if

there should be sufficient money avollable

in the clearance fund to pay the $55, the

.Automatic Tax Board could not levy the ad

valopem tax of 35 cents for schools D s 0 e

. .

Eon. Reauford Ii, Jester, Page 2, V-204

“I shall’,be grateful for your opin-

ion on the matter.”

The Constitution of Texas, Section 3, Ar-

ticle VII, provides in part as follows:

%ne-fourth of the revenue derived

from the State occupation taxes and poll

tax of one dollar a 0 0 shall be set a-

part annually for the benefit of the pub-

lic free schools; and In addition thereto,

there shall be l.evled and collected an an-

nual ad valorem State tax of such an amount

not to exceed thirty-five cents on the one

hundred ($100.00) dollars valuation, es

with the available school fund arising

from all other sources, vi11 be sufficient

to maintain end support the public schools

of this State for a period of not less than

six months in each year, and it shall be

the duty of the State Board of Education to

set aside a sufficient amount out of the

said tax to provide free text books for

the use of children attending the public

free schools of this State; provided, how-

Retterating the sources of funds for the

support of the public free schools, the Con& it ution

provides for the foll.owlng:

1. One-fourth of the occupation taxes,

2. The poll tax.

3. Other sources available to the

school fund. These “other sources’

(Article 2823, lt. C. 5,) Include

interest on bonds and other funds;

Hon. Beauford Ii. Jester, Page 3, V-204

interest on proceeds from the

sale of land; moneys from leases;

and all direct appropriations to

the Available School Fund, except

such final appropriation (5 below)

as may be necessary to make UP the

deficit In the total sum required

to maintain end support the publtc

schools,

4. Ad valorem tax not to exceed 35

cents on the hundred dollar valua-

tion.

5. Appropriations from the general rev-

enue to make up the "deficit", if

the four above listed sources are

Insufficient.

Under the Constitution, the general reve'nue

may be used for the support of the publFc free schools

in two ways. First, direct appropriations may be made

from the general revenue to the Available School Fund

and be included as one of the "other, sources’ (item 3

above) to be considered by the Automatic Tax Board In

fixing the ad valorem tax rate for school purposes,

This is in accord with the Interpretation of Article

VII of the Texas Constitution made over a long period

Hon. Beauford Ii. Jester, Page 4, V-204

of years by the Legislature and the Courts, In defin-

ing what shell constitute the Aveil,able School Fscd,

Article 2823, v. C. s., the Legisls,ture said thatt ir

should include “other Available School Funds prcrlded

by Iaw,” The history of educational legislation 1.n

Texas shows that the provisions o.f Artlck XI, -,ke

edncat:lonel Artic1.r of t.he Con.st itotioc,, ?mve never

bets regardcld as lin~ltetic~:~s ‘bg~ impll.cat.lon on tnc

gEC?l.ei'al power af tk Legl.s~.st:ure t3 appropriate mou

e.;: fern the general Lund ar:d fPOlli 0tk5P sources ti.r,-

act to the Avalleble School Fund or to ctkr schcoi

p!lrpuse 3. On many cccaslocs the Texe:s Legislature

has made direct apprcprietions from the generai rev-

sue to the Available School Fund, end on several oc-

casions larger percentages then oc.e fcurth of the oc-

cupation taxes have been assl.gned to the Schcol Fund.

These Acts, and this Ieglslatlve interpretation. of

the Constltut ion, have been approved by our courts 0

See, Mumme vs. Marra,; 120 Tex. Reports 383, When

such direct appropriations are made to tfie Available

School Fund before the ad valorem tax Is set, it 1s

clear that they are to be considered In arriving at

the rate of ad veiorem tax needed for school purposes.

The second manner in which appropriations

may be made from the general revenue is outlined In

Han; Beauford H. Jester, Page 5, V-204

the last phrase of that portion of Sect Ion 3, AP-

title VII, quoted above, for the purpose of making

up the deficit, if any, after totaling the estimated

revenue from all of other sources named above, ln-

cludlng the ad velorem tax (Items 1, 2, 3, and 4

above) S When It is clear that such appropriations

are made by the Legislature only for the purpose of

raising the total available funds to the amount re-

quired to meet the necessary per capita apportlon-

ment, obviously they should not be considered by

the Automatic Tax Board In f lxing the ad velorem

tax rate for school purposes. Such appropriations

could not be credited to the Available School Fund

until after the ad valorem tax rate has been set and

the est lmated def felt , If any, has ‘been determined,

Therefore, it remains for us to determine

what typs of appropriation was contemplated and ec-

tuallg mede by the 50th Legislature In House Bill

301. The bill provides, in pert, as followsz

“‘(4-e) After the above allocations

and payments have been made from such Clear-

ance Fund, beginning with the fiscal year

September 1, 1947, end annually thereafter,

there is hereby appropriated, allocated,

transferred, and credited to the Available

State School Fund such a sum which when

taken tonether with the’ total of all other

statutory and c

true to the Ava

Hon. Beauford H. Jester, Page 6, V-204

to such a total as may be needed to D y

a Fifty-rive Dolla capita ip-

;r:;zynt for eagh’ f%‘e%y scholastic

tate-approved school census for

vision of this Act by taking into account

his estimate of such other constitutional

and statutory amounts to accrue to the

Available School Fund as made at the begin-

ning of each fiscal year. Thereafter the

Comptroller shall allocate, transfer, and

credit monthly in equal monthly installments

from the Clearance Fund to the Available

State School Fund such amount as so deter-

mined . The Comptroller Is hereby author-

ized to modify from time to time during

the fiscal year his estimates of the rev-

enue to accrue to the State Available School

Fund in any one year, and shall la the

light of the revised estimate or estimates

increase, diminish, or suspend any remain-

ing monthly payment or paymsnts from the

Clearance Fund to the Available School Fund,

provided by the close of each fiscal year

there shall have been paid from the Clear-

ance Fund to the Available School Fund

such an amount as may be neaded to enable

the Available State School Fund to pay

said Fifty-five Dollar ($55) pel;, capita

apportionment annually in full e

Clearly, we believe that the Legislature in-

tended by this Act to provide the second type of ap-

proprlation above discussed. This bill contemplates

the transfer of no money to the Available School Fund

until after “the total of all other statutory and con-

stitutional amounts” have been considered, determined,

and credited to the School Fund. go part of such al-

location should be considered by the Tax Board in

Hon. Beauford H. Jester, Page 7, V-204

setting the ad valorem tax rate for school purposes,

The Board should set the rate of such an amount as

with all other sources of school revenue, will meet

the $55 .OO per capita set by the Legislrt ure, and,

without considering any portion of the funds that

may ba allocated thereafter under House Bill 301 to

make up the balance, if any, necessary to pay such

per capita apportionment 0

That this was the intent of the, Legislature

in House Bill 301, i3 shown by the fact that the Com-

troller Is not authorized to transfer any of the mon-

ey from the Clearance Fund until September 1, the

beginning date of each fiscal year 0 Prior to that

time, within five days after July 15th of each year,

the Tax Board is required by Article 7043, V0 C. 3, 9

to meet and calculate the ad valorem tax rate for

school purposea for the next fiscal year. Only after

that has been done and not before September 1st of

the aan year may the Comptroller transfer money from

the Clearance Fund, if needed to pay the full $55”00

per capita apport ionmeat s

Therefore, the Automatic Tax Board must

mset In accordance with Article 7043, V, C, 3,, aad

levy an ad valorem tax of such an amount, not to ex-

ceed 35# on the $lOO,OO valuation, as with the available

Hon. Beauford Ii. Jester, Page 8, V-204

school fulla arising from all other sources (not in-

cluding the allocation in Ii. B. 301) will be suffl-

clent to pay the $55.00 per capita for maintenance

and support of the public schools. Thereafter, if

the total of the ad valorem tax and all of these oth-

er aourcea is Insufficient to pay the $55.00 per cap-

ita, and only in such event, the Comptroller Is auth-

orized by 11. B. 301 to transfer such aurns as may be

necessary to make up the full per capita of $55.00

set by the Isglslature. In no event is the Comptrol-

ler authorized to determine the amount to be trans-

ferred or to make any portion of such transfer from

the Clearance Fund until the beginning date (Septem-

ber 1st) of each fiscal year.

SUMMAHY

The allocations authorized in House

Bill 301, 50th Legislature, from the Clear-

ance Fund to the Available School Fund are

limited to such amounts as may be necessary

to pay the $55.00 per capita apportionment

after the Automatic Tax Board has levied

an ad valorem tax for school purposes not

to exceed 359? on the $100.00 valuation.

The Automatic Tax Board must levy the ad

valorem tax without regard to any suma

that may become available later from the

Clearance Fund. The State Comptroller is

not authorized to transfer any money from

the Clearance Fund until September 1st of

each fiscal year, such date being subse-

quent to calculation and levy of the ad

valorem tax by the Automatic Tax Board.

Hon. &auford H. Jester, Page 9, V-204

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Price Daniel

Price Daniel

Attorney General

PD:sh:mrj

The foregoing opinion was considered

and approved in Confere ce composed of As-

sistant Attorney Genera' 9 Fagan Dickson,

Chester Qlllson, Joe Gr+enhlll, J. C. Davis,

Jr., and Ocie Speer.

/a/ Fagan Dickson

Fagan Dickson

First Assistant Attorney General

Chairman of the Conference

Approved: May 19, 1947

Attorney General of Texas

This Opinion aonsidered and

approved in limited conference.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.