Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.62s
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1967
M-81 Executive Secretary State Board of Hairdressers Re: Whether the State Board has & Cosmetologists the authority to require an Sam Houston Building applicant … V. Geppert, Co-Chairman Paul Martin W. 0. Shultz Milton Richardson John Duren STAFF LEGAL ASSISTANT A. J. Carubbi, Jr. - 364 -
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 2007
An assistant district attorney holds "appointive office" as defined by R.S. 42:62 (2) 1 ; see also Article V, § 26(A) of the Louisiana Constitution (1974) stating that "a district attorney may select assistants as authorized … of Regents, the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, the Board of Supervisors of Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, the State Board of Elementary
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1996
Trainliner Corp. v. Director of Revenue , 783 S.W.2d 917 (Mo. banc 1990). We find that meaning in the dictionary. Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Director of Revenue , no. 77667 (Mo. banc Oct. 24, 1995) slip op. at 4. … The term "voluntary" modifies either "district" or "board." In State ex inf. Gavin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1941
the:~~tWee~member Board m8 appointad. … This being true it s.lno~bent upon It to'appoint its ws Board Of BqudSSstlOn. Chspibera(I. Cook (Cl% 4~. )-:lat 8. Al 665; Hller v',Van08 (au&. Oh) 180 8. W.~759.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1974
Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (Fla. 1969); Canney v. Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County 278 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1973). … Any gathering of two or more members of a board called for the purpose of discussing the business of the board comes within the scope of the Sunshine Law. City of Miami Beach v. Berns, 245 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 2006
Stat., providing: "All provisions of chapter 456 relating to activities of regulatory boards apply to the board. … Nicolitz v. Board of Opticianry, 609 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the court considered a similar statute, s. 455.225 , Fla.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · May 5, 1999
No. 104 v. … (California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1133 , 1147 ; Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 , 1165-1166 ; Regents of University of California v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
Ib1owuenMwsh, Paas 3 (V*363) ” *a .,,Agrade of Qot less thbn @aYOAtJf OA any one eubjeot shall be required to paea the exam&nation. … Eloqpm Yesobs Pa&r 4 ( V-B85 ) the subdslegatfsn le valid.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1992
City of Jackson v. Houck, 43 S.W.2d 908 , 909 (Mo.App. 1931). Section 79.130 , RSMo Supp. 1991, sets forth the procedure to be followed by a fourth class city in enacting an ordinance. Such section provides: 79.130 . … Cimasi v. City of Fenton, 659 S.W.2d 532 , 535 (Mo.App. 1983). Section 79.280 provides for a successor to be selected but sets forth no specific procedure.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1977
v Board of Educ. of the City of N.Y., supra, at p 542). … pedagogic' ( Matter of Hirshfield v Cook, supra, at p 304 ; see, also, Matter of Daniman v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., supra at p 542).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 1997
Ryan v. Green , 58 N.Y. 295 (1874). In that case the Court held that two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the other or if there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices. … a member of that board if the subject of the vote is a proposal, application or vote of the municipal board of which he or she is also a member.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 2010
For example, the court in Stanfield v. … No. 10-1240, dated September 27, 2010. 8 City of Miami Beach v. Berns , 245 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1971); Times Publishing Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2010
See Potts v. Morehouse Parish School Board , 150 So. 290 (La. *Page 3 1933) and Boyer v. St. Amant , 364 So.2d 1338 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1978); La. Atty. Gen. Op. … See also State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1974
But as stated in City of Coral Gables v. Weksler, 164 So.2d 260 (3 D.C.A. … See also State v. Hooten, 122 So.2d 336 , 340 (2 D.C.A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1977
We believe that general laws governing expendi- tures by cities and counties would be applicable to such a board, - V.T.C.S. art. 2368a. Compare. Attorney General Opinion C-359 (1964) with V-1100 (1950). … tween the city and county on whose behalf the board operates.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1996
The Nebraska Supreme Court has held that the constitutional power of the Nebraska Board of Pardons may not be usurped by the Legislature or by the Courts. In State v. … See, e.g. , Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v. Exon , 199 Neb. 146 , 149 (1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1983
See, Florida State Racing Commission v. McLaughlin, 102 So.2d 574 (Fla. 1958); State v. City of Jacksonville, 50 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1951); Florida Industrial Commission v. Growers Equipment Co., 12 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1943). … to impose a civil penalty for violation of that board's cease and desist orders; and see, Broward County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedColorado Attorney General Reports · Sep 6, 1979
Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. Jorgensen , No. 28353 (Colo. Aug. 20, 1979). … Because it is often held that an agency is bound by its procedural rules, Vitarelli v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1994
It is clear that the authority and responsibility for the control of county expenditures is vested in the board of county commissioners. Hackler v. … Thacher Stephens v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co ., 13 Kan. 182 , 189-90 (1874). It seems that the statutes give authority and the duty to run county business to the county commissioners as a board, but not as individuals.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1982
In Ainslie v Lounsbery, 275 App. … Van Deren v Moore, 78 App. Div. 28 [4th Dept, 1902]; 1976 Op Atty Gen [Inf] 210).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna