Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1967
Status
Published
On the bench
Crawford Martin
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

June 2, 1967

Mrs. Bess Blackwell Opinion No. M-81

Executive Secretary

State Board of Hairdressers Re: Whether the State Board has

& Cosmetologists the authority to require an

Sam Houston Building applicant for an original li-

Austin, Texas tense to select a name other

than one already recorded with

Dear Mrs. Blackwell: the Board.

You have requested the opinion of this office regarding

the above question. In this connection we quote from Section 10,

Article 73&b, Vernon's Penal Code:

"The Board may refuse to issue or to re-

new or may suspend or revoke any license issued

in accordance with the provisions of this Act

for the following reasons:

11

. . . .

"(e) Advertising, practicing, or attempt-

ing to practice under the name or trade name of

another licensee under this Act;

II

. . . .' (Emphasis supplied.)

Under the above quoted statutory provision, it is the

opinion of this office that the State Board of Hairdressers and

Cosmetologists has the authority, in the proper exercise of Its

discretion, to refuse to Issue a license to an applicant who has

selected the same name as a business previously licensed by the

Board and stin In operation. Any such refusal to issue a li-

cense must, of course3 be dependent upon a Board hearing con-

ducted in accordance with Sections 11(a) and 11(b), Article 73&b,

Vernon's Penal Code.

In connection with any possible Board hearing held In

the future on the subject of trade names, you are advised that

- 363 -

Mrs. Bess Blackwell, page 2 (~~-81)

Vernon's Penal Code, has no appli-

Section 2(h), Article 73)-&b,

cation to the determination of what constitutes 'advertising,

practicing, or attemptlng to practice under the name or trade

name of another licensee under this Act." The said Section 2(h)

is concerned solely with defining those businesses subject to

licensing; the specific listing of names is made to Insure that

a business engaged In the oractice or teaching of cosmetology or

hairdressing may not escape licensing through the use of a sub-

terfuge.

SUMMARY

After proper hearing, as provided In Article

73&b, Vernon's Penal Code, the State Board of Hair-

dressers and Cosmetologists has the authority to

refuse to issue a license for the operation of a

business which has the same name as a business pre-

viously licensed by the Board and still in operation.

neral of Texas

Prepared by Malcolm L. Quick

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman

W. V. Geppert, Co-Chairman

Paul Martin

W. 0. Shultz

Milton Richardson

John Duren

STAFF LEGAL ASSISTANT

A. J. Carubbi, Jr.

- 364 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.