Case law

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950

McCoy, D.C., President Board of ChiropracticExamtnere Austin, Texas Opinion NO. v-1081 Rer The authority of the Texas Board of ChiropracticEx- … ClcCoy,D.C., page 2 (v-1081) You desire to know whether a chiropractorof a.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

Brown, page 2 - v-81 this provision. The trouble seems to be that the Securities and Exchange Commis- sion does not approve an issue but simply registers the same. … Brown, page 4 - v-81 a 'list approved" b the Conmtissionwithin the mean- ing of subdivision 9b) of Sec. 23 of the Texas Securi- tie8 Act.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1986

V.4, at 7761. Article 6813f SGW7476230 provides in full: scct:.on 1. In this Act, 'state board or corn- 4309 N. Tenth. … Section 4 of article V of the current General Appropriations Act implements this statute by prescribing per diem: PER DIEM OF BOARD OR COMMISSION MEMBERS.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2006

California's civil service encompasses every state employee and officer except those who are the subject of an exemption specified in the Constitution. ( Professional Engineers v. … Department of Transportation (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543 , 548 ; California State Employees' Assn. v. Williams (1970) 7 Cal.3d 390 , 395 ; 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 27 , 28 (1984); 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 475 , 479-480 (1982).)

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951

Calve& Page 3 (V-1243) received by the State Board of Control at its prin- cipal office in Austin, Texas, and publicly opened, the award for such rental contract will be made to the lowest and … The claim was approved by that Board for payment out of Item Hoii. Robert S. Calvert, Page 4 (V-1243) 50 of its current appropriation for printing, contingent ex- penses, and other purposes.

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 108OAG21

Maryland Attorney General Reports · May 15, 2023

An eleven-member body called the Maryland 529 Board (the “Board”) currently oversees all three programs. Educ. § 18-1904.5 Board members are fiduciaries subject to bond requirements. Id. §§ 18-1907(a), 18-1908. … It is “inconsistent with common sense,” State v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 2011

No. 06-0214, this office stated that: Since school boards are included in the definition of "lessor" under La.R.S. 41:1211 , the Ellis [v. … No. 05-0172 (see Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales, Louisiana, Inc. v.

(2007)

92 Op. Att'y Gen. 148 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2007

See Board of Trustees of Howard Community College v. John K Ruff, Inc. , 278 Md. 580 , 586-88 , 366 A.2d 360 , 364 (1976) (sovereign immunity); see also Davis v. … Brohawn Bros. v. Board , 269 Md. 169 , 172 , 304 A.2d 819 , 823 (1973) (sovereign immunity) and Prince George's County v.

Opinion No. Oag 11-78, (1978)

67 Op. Att'y Gen. 47 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1978

See Colburn v. Ozaukee County , 39 Wis.2d 231 , 159 N.W.2d 33 (1968), as to distinction between notice of injury and notice of claim statutes. … The court stated that the contractor's claim had to be submitted to the county board as a condition precedent to suit. Joyce v. Sauk County , 206 Wis. 202 , 239 N.W. 439 (1931).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 2011

Further, while the Board licenses the teachers of these programs and inspects the programs for compliance with the Board's health and safety regulations, it is the State Board of Career Education that must "approve," not … Corp. v.

Opinion No. (1978)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 1978

See, cases against the State Board of Equalization and Assessment in 185 Neb. pp. 741 to 775. In Carpenter v. … As the Supreme Court said in Carpenter v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1998

Faulkner v. Woodard, 203 Ark. 254 , 257 , 156 S.W.2d 243 (1941), citing Wood v. Miller, 154 Ark. 318 , 242 S.W. 573 (1922). … The Justice v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 2002

No. 99-21; see also , Matter of Tuxedo Conservation Taxpayers Assoc. v. … In Matter of Tuxedo Conservation Taxpayers Assoc. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 2005

See e.g., Sedlak v. … James v. Schorr, 45 Del. 18 ; 65 A.2d 810 (1948). See also generally, McCarley v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 2010

to discuss "strategy sessions or negotiations with respect to collective bargaining . . . when an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the bargaining . . . position of the public body." 2 Title Research Corp. v. … Rausch , 450 So.2d 933 (La. 1984); Landis v. Moreau , 00-1157 (La. 2/21/01), 779 So.2d 691 . 3 La.R.S. 44:31 . 4 La.R.S.44:1(A)(2)(a).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1941

Divisionof thin Board for Lt6 approvalcertainInvoicesfor repairwork and parts installadin certain automobile6and trucks belongingto the Parks Board..These iwoioes were render- ed bythe J. V. … V. Ash, a miimberof the Park6 Board,and have been approvedfor paym6ntby Mr. Ash in his capacityas a member of the said Board.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 2009

Byrd v. State , 240 Ark. 743 , 402 S.W.2d 121 (1966). The most common constitutional prohibitions include Ark. … Thompson v. Roberts , 333 Ark. 544 , 549 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998). See also Byrd v. State , supra .

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 2006

Marceaux: You requested an Attorney General's opinion regarding the State Licensing Board of Contractors' ("Board") 50 th Anniversary. … Although the Board receives no appropriations from the legislature, the funds that it generates through licenses and fees are nevertheless public funds. State Licensing Board of Contractors v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 2009

No. 89-1 placing the matter before the electors as proscribed in K.S.A. 19-4605 (d). 6 K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 77-201 , Second. 7 City of Wichita v. 200 South Broadway , 253 Kan. 434 , 436 (1993). 8 Thomas County Taxpayers Ass'n … v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 2011

You have explained that the board currently has some vacancies and you anticipate more in the near future, and thus you ask how many board members are necessary to approve matters that are voted on. … See Roosevelt Islanders for Responsible Southtown Dev. v. Roosevelt Island Oper. Corp. , 291 A.D.2d 40 , 49-50 (1 st Dep't 2001); New York State Urban Devel. Corp. v.