Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1947
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

R-95

OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

PRICE DANIEL

ATTORNEYGENERAL

March 10, 1947

Honorable Paul B. Drown Opinion NO. v-81

Secretary of State

Austin, Texas Re: Whether certain

foreign securities

"registered" with

the Securities and

Exchange Commission

of the United States

are 'on the list ap-

proved by the Securi-

ties and Exchange

Commission", as con-

templated by subdivl-

sion (b) of Sec. 23,

of the Texas Securi-

ties Act, and there-

fore exempt from the

provisions of the Act.

Dear Sip:

You request advice as follows:

"Subdivision (b) of Section 23 of the

Texas Securities Act, under exemptions, pro-

vides as follows:

"'Any security Issued OP guaranteed by

any foreign government with which the United

States is at the time of the sale, or offer

of sale thereof, maintaining diplomatic re-

lations, OP by any State, province OF poli-

tical subdivision thereof having the power

of taxation or assessment, which security is

recognized at the time it is offered for sale

in this State as valid obligation by suah

foreign government OP by such State, province,

or political subdivision thereof issuing the

same, provided however, that such securities

must be on the list approved by the Securities

and Bchange Commission of the United States.'

"We have had several requests for informa-

tion In regard to possible exemptions under

Hon. Paul I-i.

Brown, page 2 - v-81

this provision. The trouble seems to be

that the Securities and Exchange Commis-

sion does not approve an issue but simply

registers the same. It would appear that

the Legislature had in mind sn actual

approval by this Commission before an ex-

emption could be claimed. In the registra-

tion of these Issues by the Securities and

Exchange Commission they always state that

this should not be considered as an approv-

al.

"The question is, shall we consider

a security, which meets all other require-

ments of'this-exemption as exempt when the

same is simply registered with the Securi-

ties anrf.

Exchange Commission and not ap-

proved.

The authority and duties of the Securities

end Exchange Commission as they pertain to the type of

securities inquired about are set out in Title 15, Chap-

ter 2A of the United States Code Annotated. As we con-

strue the provisions of Chapter 2A, the Conznisslonhas

no authority OP duty to 'approve" any of the securities

inquired about. We have also directed an Inquiry to

the Chief Counsel, Corporations Finance Division, Securi-

ties and Exchange Commission, requesting confirmation of

our construction of the Federal Act. The reply received

by this office is to the effect that the Commission

does not and has not approved, nor has it been author-

ized to approve any such securities since the creation

of the Commission.

The only authority granted the Commission by

Federal law, in this connection, Is to allow securities

to be "registered' upon application by the issuer after

submission by, the issuer of extensive data disclosing

matters of Interest to Investors as required by the Act.

Apparently, the only decision required of the Commission

is a determination that the application contains the data

required by law. Ho authority or duty is placed upon the

Commission by the Federal act to pass upon the investment

merits of the securities so "registered , nor upon whether

OP not the securities have investment value.

On the other hand, the Texas Securities Act,

which is published as Art. 600a of Vernon's Civil Statutes

of Texas, contemplates a determination hy the Secretary of

.

1

Eon. Paul H. Brown, page 3 - v-81

State that "the plan of business of the applicant

appears to be fair, just and equitable, and that

the secuPities which it proposes to issue and the

method to be used by it in issuing and disposing

of the same ar8 not su% as will work a fraud upon

the purchasers thereof. This determination is made

in the form Of a "finding". Without a permit, the

sale of such securities is unlavful. Th8 issuance

of the permit contemplated depends upon a favorable

"finding". See Sections 8 and 9 of the Securities

Act.

It Will be noted that the word "approved"

Is also used in paragraph (f) of Sec. 23 of Art.

600a, which exempts securities listed on recognized

and responsible stock exchanges, which exchanges have

been I'approved"by the Secretary of State. Such ap-

proval under paragraph (f) is conditioned that the

exchanges supply to the Secretary OS State facts and

data which "shall b8 found to establish:

'I** *

"(2) That the governing constitution,

by-laws, and/or regulations of such ex-

changes shall require:

"* * *

"3rd. Securities listed and traded in

on such 8XChange to be restricted to those

of ascertained, sound asset and/or income

value."

Thus, consistent with the scheme of the Act,

the "approval" under paragraph (f) contemplates more

than a mere disclosure of true facts as a condition

precedent to engaging in the issuance and Sale of secu-

rities in Texas. As a safeguard to the investor, it

contemplates that qualifications be imposed on the

issuer tending to guarantee value. And 'appPovaln

appears to mean that ,the Secsy of State has ascer-

tained that the saf8gtIardsexist.

It thus appears that "approval" as used in

the Texas seCUPiti8S Act means more than "registration"

under the Federal Act, and no reason appear8 tOnoon-

strue "registration" to mean the same thing as appPo-

val" or to hold that a list of registered securities is

Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 4 - v-81

a 'list approved" b the Conmtissionwithin the mean-

ing of subdivision 9b) of Sec. 23 of the Texas Securi-

tie8 Act.

Since the Securities and Exchange Commission

could haV8 been given powers by Congress of a nature

leading to an approval substantially similar to that

contemplated by the Texas Act, and since such may yet

be done by Congress at its pleasure, it is our opinion

that the exemption contained In paragraph (b) of Sec-

tion 23 of the Texas Securities Act is and will remain

inoperative until actual approval by the Securities

and Exchange Conaaissionof such securities is author-

ized or required by Congressional enactment.

Certain foreign securities "registered"

with the Securities and Exchange COnunissiOn

of the United States are not "on the list

approved by the Securities and Exchange Com-

mission" as contemplated by the exemption

contained in subdivision (b) of Section 23

of the Texas Securities Act. (Art. 60Oa,

V.C.S.)

Very truly yours

ATTORREX GENERAL OF TEXAS

BY

N&d McDaniel

NM:rt;djm Assistant

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.