Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

1.71s

  • Gatz v. Brown

    2017 IL App (1st) 160579 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 12, 2017

    Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 160579 Appellate Court RANDALL GATZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Id.; see also Davis v. Brown, 221 Ill. 2d 435, 442 (2006).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Brown

    83 Ohio App. 3d 230 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1992

    The court awarded Jackson the sum of $325, and awarded Brown $325 plus costs and interest. Brown was also awarded attorney fees. … However, the efforts of paralegals and law clerks have been included; see Mieskoski v. Mieskoski (Apr. 28, 1987), Cuyahoga App. No. 52230, unreported, 1987 WL 11670 ; Maze v. Maze (July 22, 1985), Cuyahoga App.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    421 S.C. 337 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Aug 2, 2017

    State v. Winkler, 388 S.C. 574, 583 , 698 S.E.2d 596, 601 (2010) (quoting State v. Saltz, 346 S.C. 114, 121 , 551 S.E.2d 240, 244 (2001)). … State v. McHoney, 344 S.C. 85 , 544 S.E.2d 30 (2001). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Farrow v. Brown

    873 S.W.2d 918 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1994

    Brown admitted the existence of a prescriptive easement from plaintiffs land across his property. … See Hartley v. Brazeal, 224 S.W.2d 550 (Mo.App.1949); Richter v. Rogers, 327 Mo. 543 , 37 S.W.2d 523 (1931); Fortenberry v. Bali 668 S.W.2d 216 (Mo.App.1984).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Brown

    222 S.W.2d 442 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 7, 1949

    In Honea v. … See also Insurance Company of North America v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hite v. Brown

    100 Ohio App. 3d 606 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1995

    Mussivand v. David, 45 Ohio St.3d at 319 , 544 N.E.2d at 270-271 . Eisenhuth v. … Bd. (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 112 , 554 N.E.2d 1301 , paragraph two of the syllabus states, “[a] children services board and its agents have a duty to investigate and report their findings as required by R.C. 2151.421 when a

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dutton

    38 Tex. Civ. App. 294 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1905

    Dutton v. D. R. Brown, was actually made and entered on March 2, 1903, as alleged in said W. F. … (Keator v. Case, 31 S. W. Rep., 1099 ; O’Neil v. Brown, 61 Texas, 34 ; Taylor v. Fore, 42 Texas, 256 .) In the case of Roller v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    953 S.W.2d 133 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1997

    See State v. Hester, 801 S.W.2d 695, 697 (Mo.1991). 7 . See State v. Redman, 916 S.W.2d 787 (Mo.1996); State v. Wright, 751 S.W.2d 48 (Mo.1988); State v. McGuire, 892 S.W.2d 381 (Mo.App.1995); State v. … . *140 1994); State v. Phelps, 816 S.W.2d 227 (Mo.App.1991); State v. Zamora, 809 S.W.2d 83 (Mo.App.1991); State v. Boyer, 803 S.W.2d 132 (Mo.App.1991); State v. Keil, 794 S.W.2d 289 (Mo.App.1990); State v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Zaino

    226 A.D.2d 492 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1996

    Hosp., 51 NY2d 242 ; George v Mt. Sinai Hosp., 47 NY2d 170 ; Snay v Cohoes Mem. Hosp., 110 AD2d 1021 ). … It *494 therefore appears that the issue is pending and undecided by the Supreme Court, such that we may not address the argument on this appeal (see, Daniels v Judelson, 215 AD2d 623 ; Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536, 542-543 )

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    636 So. 2d 174 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 29, 1994

    In State v. Wells, 539 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1989), aff'd, Florida v. … See State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Schaffer

    145 Ind. App. 591 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1969

    Brown, my deceased brother, formerly of Leesburg, Indiana. “ITEM V. … Coon v. Coon (1918), 187 Ind. 478, 484 , 118 N. E. 820 . See Garrigus v. Board of Commissionesr of Parke Co. (1872), 39 Ind. 66, 70 .” In the case of Curry v. Curry (1914), 58 Ind. App. 567 , at page 576, 105 N.

    Overruled on other grounds by Pepka v. Branch, 155 Ind. App. 637 (1973)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    543 S.W.2d 796 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1976

    State v. Morse, 526 S.W.2d 432 (Mo.App.1975); State v. Nelson, 526 S.W.2d 56 (Mo.App. *797 1975); State v. Richardson, 519 S.W.2d 15 (Mo.1975). … We are clearly bound by State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    272 A.D.2d 338 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2000

    v Mapp, 245 AD2d 307 ; People v Persaud, 237 AD2d 538 ). … People v Stith, 215 AD2d 789 ; People v Cox, 161 AD2d 724, 725 ; People v Jakes, 181 AD2d 913 ).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Schroeder

    88 Cal. App. 192 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1927

    (Hulen v. Stuart, 191 Cal. 571 [ 217 Pac. 750 ].) In Millard v. … Brown v. Schroeder et al.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Jasinski v. Brown

    24 N.E.3d 976 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2013

    Campins v. Capels, 461 N.E.2d 712, 722 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). … Quebe v. Davis, 586 N.E.2d 914, 920 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (citation omitted). 1.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Barham

    242 Cal. App. 2d 696 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1966

    Barham died and Viola Brown, as executrix of her estate, was substituted as appellant. The Barhams were married on May 31, 1938. … (Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1, 4 [ 147 P. 1168 ].)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sam Brown v. Gloria J. Brown

    Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Jun 10, 2004

    In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-03-00978-CV ____________ SAM BROWN, Appellant V. GLORIA J. … (declining to find the appeal was brought in bad faith where it involved the confusing distinction between void and voidable judgments); Smith v. Brown , 51 S.W.3d 376, 382 (Tex. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    14 Cal. App. 3d 507 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1971

    See also *511 People v. … It was recently held in Morel v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    293 A.D.2d 686 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2002

    The witness had a clear and unobstructed view of the defendant, under well-lit conditions, for a 15-second period during the commission of the crime (see People v Androvett, 135 AD2d 640 ; People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    250 Ga. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 3, 2001

    Pullen v. State, 199 Ga. App. 881, 882 ( 406 SE2d 283 ) (1991); Wilson v. State, 211 Ga. App. 486, 489 (4) ( 439 SE2d 701 ) (1993). … Brown, Jr., for appellee.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.