Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

3.44s

  • People v. Brown

    57 Ill. App. 3d 528 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 25, 1978

    PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI delivered the opinion of the court: A jury found the defendant, Patsy Brown, guilty of both the attempt to murder Cheryl Edwards (Ill. Rev. … (People v. Brown (1973), 9 Ill. App. 3d 730 , 293 N.E.2d 1 .) The existence of a time interval between the defendant’s act and death does not preclude such a causal link (People v. Hughes (1977), 46 Ill.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Meegan v. Brown

    74 A.D.3d 1824 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 2010

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    215 A.D.2d 333 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 1995

    (See, People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 627 .) … (Supra, at 627; see, People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 533 , cert denied 454 US 898 ; see also, People v Hunt, 155 AD2d 957 , Iv denied 75 NY2d 814 , People v Parris, 136 AD2d 882 , Iv dismissed 71 NY2d 1031 .)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    235 So. 3d 872 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 16, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Press v. City of Minneapolis

    553 N.W.2d 80 · Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Aug 27, 1996

    App.1994) (county board’s denial of application for conditional use permit for hog feedlot), review denied (Minn. Oct. 27, 1994); Township of Honner v. … State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Grosskopf

    984 N.E.2d 1167 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 13, 2013

    BROWN, State’s Attorney of Livingston County, Plaintiff- Caption Appellant, v. MATTHEW E. … Carr v. Koch, 2012 IL 113414, ¶ 27.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kirtland v. Brown

    2019 Ohio 748 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2019

    [Cite as Kirtland v. Brown, 2019-Ohio-748.] … Knapp v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    130 Ga. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 16, 1973

    See Draper v. United States, 358 U. S. 307 (79 SC 329, 3 LE2d 327); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410 (89 SC 584, 21 LE2d 637); United States v. Harris, 403 U. S. 573 (91 SC 2075, 29 LE2d 723). … Gee v. State, 121 Ga. App. 41 ( 172 SE2d 480 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Brown

    160 A.3d 262 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    843 So. 2d 930 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 26, 2003

    843 So.2d 930 (2003) Taronn Kenard BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D01-3069. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 26, 2003. … Teronn Kenard Brown appeals his conviction and sentence for second degree murder. We affirm. Defendant-appellant Brown argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Brown, M.

    240 A.3d 970 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2020

    In Commonwealth v. Lewis, 45 A.3d 405, 411–13 (Pa. … Commonwealth v. Heredia, 97 A.3d 392, 395 n.7.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    18 Ill. App. 3d 1049 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 3, 1974

    People v. Johnson, 34 Ill.2d 202, 206 (1966); People v. Sanders, 56 Ill.2d 241, 250 (1974); City of Chicago v. Mayer, 56 Ill.2d 366, 369-70 (1974). … The complaint states: “* tt * That on the 9th day of Nov. 1971, in the County of Winnebago, State of Illinois, Petro Brown committed the offense of AGGRAVATED BATTERY, in that he, knowingly or intentionally and without legal

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hall

    80 N.M. 556 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1969

    Simon v. Akin, 79 N.M. 689 , 448 P.2d 795 (1968); Apodaca v. Miller, 79 N.M. 160 , 441 P.2d 200 (1968). … The circumstances are closer to those of Mozert v. Noeding, 76 N.M. 396 , 415 P.2d 364 (1966) than to Boyce v. Brewington, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kilgore v. Brown

    90 Cal. App. 555 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1928

    (Freeman v. Foreman, 141 Mo. App. 359 [ 125 S. W. 524 ].) This does not seem to be the doctrine in Osgood v. Los Angeles etc. Co., supra, nor in Tompkins v. Clay Street R. R. … See, also, Marovich v. Central California Tr. Co., supra, Koskela v. Albion Lumber Co., 25 Cal. App. 12 [ 142 Pac. 851 ], Houghton v. Market Street Ry. Co., 1 Cal. App. 576 [ 82 Pac. 972 ], and Housel v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Brown

    13 Cal. App. 3d 513 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1970

    (Mansfield v. Pickwick Stages, 191 Cal.129, 130 [ 215 P. 389 ]; Gray v. Gray, 25 Cal.App.2d 484, 487 [ 77 P.2d 908 ]; Lenard v. … Contrawise, if there was such coverage, then the superior court is without jurisdiction and must leave the parties to pursue their remedies before the Board. (Scott v. Industrial Acc.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    288 Pa. Super. 171 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 1981

    See Commonwealth v. Ryder, 488 Pa. 404, 408 , 412 A.2d 572, 574 (1980). … Commonwealth v. Drake, 489 Pa. 541, 544-45 , 414 A.2d 1023, 1025 (1980).

    Overruled — as noted by a later courtCited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Yocum

    113 Cal. App. 621 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1931

    “I instruct you that this is a case between Viola May Brown, on the one hand, and W. A. Yocum, on the other. … (Pierce v. United Gas & Elec. Co., 161 Cal. 176 [ 118 Pac. 700 ]; Curtis v. *625 McAuliffe, 106 Cal. App. 1 [ 288 Pac. 675, 679 ].)

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    10 Fla. L. Weekly 389 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 13, 1985

    467 So.2d 323 (1985) Lucretia BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 84-1084. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. … See Hedges v. State, 172 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1965); Pouk v. State, 359 So.2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Delaford v. State, 449 So.2d 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    229 So. 3d 415 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 20, 2017

    In these consolidated cases, we review (1) an order of June 17, 2017, barring the appellant, David Brown, from filing further pro se postconviction pleadings (Case No. 3D17-1685), and (2) an order of April 27, 2017, denying … Brown’s third pro se motion and amended motion for postcon-viction relief (Case No. 3D17-1565). We affirm the orders below in each case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sojourner (In re Estate of Brown)

    424 S.C. 589 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jul 25, 2018

    Day v. Day , 216 S.C. 334 , 338, 58 S.E.2d 83 , 85 (1950) ; see also Howell v. … In Wilson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.