Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 229 So. 3d 415
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Sep 20, 2017
Status
Published
On the bench
Luck, Rothenberg, Salter
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, we review (1) an order of June 17, 2017, barring the appellant, David Brown, from filing further pro se postconviction pleadings (Case No. 3D17-1685), and (2) an order of April 27, 2017, denying Mr. Brown’s third pro se motion and amended motion for postcon-viction relief (Case No. 3D17-1565).

We affirm the orders below in each case. In Case No. 3D17-1685, however, we remand the circuit court case to the trial court for the limited purpose of issuing an amended order to correct scrivener’s errors. In paragraph 1, page 3 of the order of June 20, 2017, “Case No. F03-21028B” is to be conformed to the correct lower tribunal case number, F03-21018A (as shown in the caption, page 1 of the order). In paragraph 2, line 3 of that order, “Case No. F03-21018B” is to be . conformed as well to “F03-21018A.” The corrected order shall then be transmitted to the Department of Corrections in accordance with paragraph 3 of the order of June 20, 2017.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.