Case law

Kosberg v. Brown

601 S.W.2d 414 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 14, 1980

-Dallas 1978, no writ); Flagg Realtors, Inc. v. Harvel, 509 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1974, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Juarez v. Dunn, 567 S.W.2d 223 (Tex.Civ.App.-El Paso 1978, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Jackson v. … Magids v. Dorman, supra at 912.

Kaufman v. Brown

106 Cal. App. 2d 686 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1951

(Kaufman v. Brown, 93 Cal.App.2d 508 [ 209 P.2d 156 ].) The action went to trial, before a jury, upon a second amended complaint, the allegations of which are recited in the former opinion. … Brown, taken under section 2055, Code of Civil Procedure, the testimony of Cyrus Stearns, and the court’s instructions to the jury.

Brown v. State

28 Tex. Ct. App. 65 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1889

Brown, said defendant, is charged with the offense *68 of embezzlement,” etc. … Brown with J. A. Wilkin, C. Palm, and J. B. Wilkin as sureties. Wilkin and Wilkins are not one and the same name, and the variance is fatal. In Parchman v.

Brown v. Davidson

192 P.3d 415 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2006

Brown and Mary C. Hollis, appeal the trial court's order denying their request for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 . We reverse and remand for further proceedings. … See also Libertarian Party v. Munro, 31 F.3d 759 (9th Cir.1994) (July filing deadline constitutional); Browne v. Bayless, 202 Ariz. 405 , 46 P.3d 416 (2002).

People v. Brown

215 A.D.2d 333 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 1995

(See, People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 627 .) … (Supra, at 627; see, People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 533 , cert denied 454 US 898 ; see also, People v Hunt, 155 AD2d 957 , Iv denied 75 NY2d 814 , People v Parris, 136 AD2d 882 , Iv dismissed 71 NY2d 1031 .)

State v. Brown

56 Del. 571 · Superior Court of Delaware · Nov 6, 1963

See Turner v. … As stated in State v.

Brown v. Grosskopf

984 N.E.2d 1167 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 13, 2013

BROWN, State’s Attorney of Livingston County, Plaintiff- Caption Appellant, v. MATTHEW E. … Carr v. Koch, 2012 IL 113414, ¶ 27.

Brown v. State

130 Ga. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 16, 1973

See Draper v. United States, 358 U. S. 307 (79 SC 329, 3 LE2d 327); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410 (89 SC 584, 21 LE2d 637); United States v. Harris, 403 U. S. 573 (91 SC 2075, 29 LE2d 723). … Gee v. State, 121 Ga. App. 41 ( 172 SE2d 480 ).

People v. Brown

303 A.D.2d 989 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 2003

People v Brown, 296 AD2d 860 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 767 [2002]). This inquiry followed statements by the prosecutor and defense counsel that the plea was conditioned upon defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal. … , 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]).

Brown v. State

2 Md. App. 388 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 13, 1967

Jones v. State, 241 Md. 599 ; Harris v. State, 194 Md. 288 ; Allen v. State, 1 Md. App. 249 . … In Martel v.

Sherman M. Brown, Jr. v. Monica Gee-Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 23, 2021

BROWN, JR. v. MONICA GEE-BROWN. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.

Brown v. State

229 So. 3d 415 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 20, 2017

In these consolidated cases, we review (1) an order of June 17, 2017, barring the appellant, David Brown, from filing further pro se postconviction pleadings (Case No. 3D17-1685), and (2) an order of April 27, 2017, denying … Brown’s third pro se motion and amended motion for postcon-viction relief (Case No. 3D17-1565). We affirm the orders below in each case.

Brown v. State

111 N.E.3d 263 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2018

Brown v. State

843 So. 2d 930 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 26, 2003

843 So.2d 930 (2003) Taronn Kenard BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D01-3069. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 26, 2003. … Teronn Kenard Brown appeals his conviction and sentence for second degree murder. We affirm. Defendant-appellant Brown argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him.

Brown v. Beck

63 Cal. App. 686 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1923

Brown, while crossing Montgomery Street, in San Francisco, was struck down by a motor-truck negligently driven by an employee of the defendant. Mr. Brown sustained serious injuries which resulted in his death. … Brown's right hip bone was broken. He was taken to a hospital almost immediately after the accident, where he remained until his death.

Kilgore v. Brown

90 Cal. App. 555 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1928

(Freeman v. Foreman, 141 Mo. App. 359 [ 125 S. W. 524 ].) This does not seem to be the doctrine in Osgood v. Los Angeles etc. Co., supra, nor in Tompkins v. Clay Street R. R. … See, also, Marovich v. Central California Tr. Co., supra, Koskela v. Albion Lumber Co., 25 Cal. App. 12 [ 142 Pac. 851 ], Houghton v. Market Street Ry. Co., 1 Cal. App. 576 [ 82 Pac. 972 ], and Housel v.

Brown v. Sojourner (In re Estate of Brown)

424 S.C. 589 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jul 25, 2018

Day v. Day , 216 S.C. 334 , 338, 58 S.E.2d 83 , 85 (1950) ; see also Howell v. … In Wilson v.

People v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 04187 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 16, 2025

People v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 04187 ) People v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 04187 Decided on July 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … No. 2623/18) [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Micah Brown, appellant. Gail Gray, New York, NY, for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle M.

Jones v. Brown

13 Cal. App. 3d 513 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1970

(Mansfield v. Pickwick Stages, 191 Cal.129, 130 [ 215 P. 389 ]; Gray v. Gray, 25 Cal.App.2d 484, 487 [ 77 P.2d 908 ]; Lenard v. … Contrawise, if there was such coverage, then the superior court is without jurisdiction and must leave the parties to pursue their remedies before the Board. (Scott v. Industrial Acc.

Daniel v. State

865 So. 2d 661 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 18, 2004

See Snodgrass v. State, 837 So.2d 507, 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citing State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 237 (Fla.1996)). … Since a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170( l ) is a "critical stage" in which the defendant is entitled to effective assistance of counsel, Brown v.