Case law

Brown v. Duffus

66 Iowa 193 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 12, 1885

He cites and relies upon Lowe v. Com., 3 Metc., (Ky.,) 237; The Auditor v. Hardin, 8 B. Mon., 668 ; Brown v. Grover, 6 Bush, 1 ; Dullam v. Willson, 53 Mich., 392 ; State v. Pritchard, 36 N. J. Law, 101; State v. … McClinton, 5 Nev., 332 ; Honey v. Graham, 39 Tex., 1 ; People v. Jewett, 6 Cal., 291 ; Fant v. Gibbs, 54 Miss., 403 . In Brown v.

Brown v. Bensonn

101 Ga. 753 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 10, 1897

The case of Brown v. Benson, receiver, has heretofore been passed on by this court. Practically the same evidence is here now in both cases as was in the former record of that case. … R. v. Edmondson, ante, p. 747.

Brown v. Portland

97 Or. 600 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1920

This is upon the theory that the prior reassessment involved in the case of Brown v. Portland, which we will refer to hereafter as the former case, was not held absolutely void or annulled. … (at page 1166 of 163 Pac.), the Chief Justice said: “Thereupon the city endeavored to make another reassessment, but this was resisted and adjudged invalid in Brown v.

Brown v. Comonow

17 N.D. 84 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1908

Koch v. Briggs, 14 Cal. 257 , 73 Am. Dec. 651 ; Grant v. Burr, 54 Cal. 298 ; Bateman v. Burr, 57 Cal. 480 ; Godfrey v. Monroe, 101 Cal. 224 , 35 Pac. 761 ; Powell v. Pattison, 100 Cal. 234 , 34 Pac. 676 ; Bank v. … In Clark v.

Brown v. Addington

233 Miss. 435 · Mississippi Supreme Court · May 5, 1958

The case proceeded to trial against appellant Brown, resulting in a judgment for $10,000, from which Brown appeals. … Jones v. State, 104 Miss. 871 , 61 So. 979 ; Cecil Lumber Company v. McLeod, 122 Miss. 767 , 85 So. 78 ; Producers Grin Assn. v. Beck, 215 Miss. 263 , 60 So. 2d 642 ; Miss. State Highway Department v.

Whitehair v. Brown

80 Kan. 297 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jun 5, 1909

(Vickery v. City of Providence, 17 R. I. 651.) … (Tinkham v. Arnold, 3 Maine, *120.) But even that decision was criticized and disapproved in Williams v. Nelson, 40 Mass. 141 .

Brown v. State

38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 653 · Supreme Court of Florida · Sep 19, 2013

See Hodges v. … We reject Brown’s remaining assertions relating to the CCP aggravator. . Brown's reliance on Ross v. State, 474 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1985), Douglas v. State, 575 So.2d 165 (Fla.1991), and White v.

State v. Brown

261 Iowa 656 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 9, 1968

Brown then took her over to the next register and repeated the process. The safe was opened by one of the employees and the contents taken. Defendant Hudson stood along the wall. He also had a gun. … State v. Anderson, 260 Iowa 122 , 148 N.W.2d 414 ; State v. Rye, Iowa, 145 N.W.2d 608 ; State v. Polton, 259 Iowa 435 , 143 N.W.2d 307 ; State v. Raymond, 258 Iowa 1339 , 142 N.W.2d 444 .

Brunner v. Brown

480 N.W.2d 33 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 22, 1992

In Brown v. United States, 375 F.2d 310 (D.C.Cir.1966), an expert testified regard *37 ing the defendant’s sanity and relied in part on statements made to him by nursing assistants. … Sallis v. Lamansky, 420 N.W.2d 795, 797 (Iowa 1988); State v. Chancy, 391 N.W.2d 231, 233 (Iowa 1986).

State v. Brown

154 Wash. 2d 787 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2005

See State v. Brown, noted at 119 Wash.App. 1073 , 2004 WL 27207 , at *4. … Brown dated May 21, 2004. State v.

State v. Brown

130 So. 3d 326 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 10, 2014

In re Brown, David; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. W-04-3-77; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013 KW 1312.

Bryant v. Brown

278 Mich. 686 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1937

Plaintiff’s claim is that, as be was passing defendant Brown on tbe highway, Brown turned his car to tbe left, across tbe center line, it struck plaintiff’s car and caused it to run off tbe road and against a tree. … Brown claims he remained at all times on his own right side of tbe road, that plaintiff’s car crossed tbe center line and struck defendants’ car.

Peterson v. Brown

216 Ark. 709 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1950

Co. v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc., 185 Misc. 689 , 57 N. Y. … Kennard & Sons Carpet Company v. Dornan, 64 Mo.

State v. Brown

145 So. 3d 236 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 28, 2014

Brown v. Ward

119 Iowa 604 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 11, 1903

Brown v. Ward, 110 Iowa, 123 . Thereafter, the provisions ■ of said decree having been complied with, these proceedings were instituted for partition. … Stafford v. Fetters, 55 Iowa, 484 ; Reed v. Root, 59 Iowa, 359 ; Turpin v. Gresham, 106 Iowa, 187 ; Jamison v. Ins. Co., 85 Iowa 229 ; Green Bay Co. v. Hewitt, 62 Wis. 316 ( 21 N. W. Rep. 216 , 22 N. W. Rep. 588 ).

Murray v. Brown

177 Kan. 139 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Nov 13, 1954

Briefly stated, the story is this: Under the provisions of their father’s last will and testament, defendants, Lawrence V. Brown and Gary C. Brown, are duly qualified and acting trustees for their brother, Emory O. … Brown.

Brown v. Bonnin

132 N.H. 488 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Dec 13, 1989

Brown,” he replied, “Yes. I feel that the presence of a handrail on the left side may have been able to break that fall.” This evidence was properly sent to the jury. … In Bill v.

Brown v. Rodocker

65 Iowa 55 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 24, 1884

Brown v. Swan

1 Mass. 202 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1804

Brown v. Ward

110 Iowa 123 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 16, 1899

Rep. 532 ); Ballou v. Sherwood, 32 Neb. 666 ( 49 N. W. Rep. 790 ). … Laverty v. Hall’s Adm’ x, supra. IV.