Opinion

Brown v. Swan

  • 1 Mass. 202
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Nov 15, 1804
Status
Published
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 78.0%

The opinion

On the trial of the issue at a former term of the Court, the jury found that it was the deed of the plaintiff; and his counsel moved in arrest of judgment. Two exceptions were made to the plea— First, that a release could not be pleaded to an action of debt on a judgment, and, secondly, that the instrument pleaded in this case was not a release, being, at the most, only evidence of payment, and, therefore, the defendant should have pleaded payment, and relied upon the writing as evidence of that fact.

The real object of the motion appeared to be to obtain an order of Court for a repleader, that a new trial might be had ; but as the reasons had not been filed in the case, the Court said they saw no reasons for a new trial, and ordered judgment to be entered for the defendant, according to the verdict.

(Dana, C. J., Sedgwick, Sewall, and Thacher, justices, present.)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.