Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

3.10s

  • Brown v. Ament

    231 Mont. 158 · Montana Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1988

    - - Schwartzkopf v. Industrial Accident Board (1967), 149 Mont. 488, 493, 428 P.2d 468, 470. … See Breen v. Industrial Accident Board (1968), 150 Mont. 463, 436 P.2d 701.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Glover v. Brown

    32 Idaho 426 · Idaho Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1919

    (Bates v. Howard, 105 Cal. 173 , 38 Pac. 715 ; Robinson v. Fair, 128 U. S. 53 , 9 Sup. Ct. 30, 32 L. ed. 415, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes; Bainswanger v. Henninger, 1 Alaska, 509 ; Hume v. … (Rhino v. Emery, 72 Fed. 382 , 18 C. C. A. 600 ; Johnson v. Waters, 111 U. S. 640 , 4 Sup. Ct. 619, 28 L. ed. 547; Arrowsmith v. Gleason, 129 U. S. 36 , 9 Sup. Ct. 237, 32 L. ed. 630; McDaniel v. Traylor, 196 U.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Collier v. Brown

    285 Ala. 40 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1969

    Mudd v. Lanier, 247 Ala. 363 , 24 So.2d 550 (1945). … Joseph v. Hopkins, 276 Ala. 18 , 158 So.2d 660 (1963).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. Brown

    18 N.M. 579 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1914

    When Mary Brown bought this property from Jooseph Ileindl, Barnett v. Barnett was a rule of property upon which she could rely for her title. … In the case of McVay’s Admr. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Brown

    36 A.3d 351 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 24, 2012

    36 A.3d 351 (2012) WILSON v. BROWN. No. 236, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. January 24, 2012. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    453 Md. 359 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 21, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    211 Ind. 61 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1937

    School Town of Andrews v. Heiney (1912), 178 Ind. 1, 8 , 98 N. E. 628 . We adhere to this statement of the law. … In the case of Morris et al. v. City of Indianapolis et al. (1912), 177 Ind. 369, 385 , 94 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    151 Minn. 340 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Feb 10, 1922

    This allegation was held not indispensable in State v. Hosmer, 144 Minn. 342 , 175 N. W. 683 . … If he was such manager we are of the opinion that he might be liable criminally for sales made by the sales agents of the company. 23 Cyc. 257; State v. Mahoney, 23 Minn. 181 ; State v. Mueller, 38 Minn. 497 , 38 N.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Wacha v. Brown

    78 Iowa 432 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 12, 1889

    Defendant Margaret Brown, the widow of John Brown, testified on both trials. … That being true, the case falls within the rule announced in Grube v. Wells, 34 Iowa, 148 . See, also, State v. Welpton, 34 Iowa, 145 ; Skinner v. Crawford, 54 Iowa, 119 ; Donahue v. Lannan, 70 Iowa, 73 ; Weinig v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    25 Ariz. 518 · Arizona Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1923

    Sutherland on Statutory Construction, pp. 796, 797; Coggins v. Ely, 23 Ariz. 155 , 202 Pac. 391 ; Clark v. Boyce, 20 Ariz. 544 , 185 Pac. 136 ; Western Inv. Co. v. Murray, 6 Ariz. 215 , 56 Pac. 728 ; State v. … State v. Cadwell, 79 Iowa, 432 , 44 N. W. 700 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baer

    79 Ga. 347 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 6, 1888

    When the “Hochstadter goods” were put up, Baer told Brown it would be better for him (Baer) to bid them off, but that Brown should take them at his bid. … indebtedness of Brown to Baer, thus created, had been paid.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Brown

    184 Miss. 293 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1939

    Brown, trustee in a deed of trust executed by S. D. Morgan to secure an indebtedness to Jim White, sued out a writ of replevin to secure possession of certain livestock and farm implements named in the deed of trust.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Williams

    166 Ga. 804 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Aug 20, 1928

    Swanson v. Kirby, 98 Ga. 586 ( 26 S. E. 71 ). … Rakestraw v. Lanier, 104 Ga. 188, 202 ( 30 S. E. 735 , 69 Am. St. R. 154 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mauck v. Brown

    59 Neb. 382 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1899

    Brown, has perfected an appeal to this court. … See Davis v. State, 51 Nebr., 301; Campbell v. Board of Pharmacy, 45 N. J. Law, 245; Curtin v. Barton, 139 N. Y., 514 .

    Disapproved in part by State ex rel. Lanham v. Sheets, 119 Neb. 145 (1929)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    639 Pa. 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bonds

    125 Ga. 833 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 18, 1906

    Brown, surrendered up and canceled. Bell v. Weyman, 99 Ga. 273 . … Walden v. Walden, 124 Ga. 145 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    296 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1984

    We restricted review in this case and the companion case, State v. … See, State v. Turner, 296 Or 451 , 676 P2d 873 (1984). We affirm the Court of Appeals.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stiles v. Brown

    380 So. 2d 792 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 22, 1980

    Stiles are Eva Stiles Brown and Susie Stiles Sharp, the daughters of Claude L. Stiles. … In Jaques v.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    143 Ark. 523 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1920

    Then, too, Baker had a conversation with Brown shortly after the robbery with regard to it, and the jury might have inferred from what Brown said that he had carried the parties to the scene of the robbery. … Dunmore v. State (Ala.), 22 So. 541 . The remarks of the prosecuting attorney were similar to the remarks of counsel held prejudicial in Fort v. State, 74 Ark. 210 , and German-American Ins. Co. v. Harper, 70 Ark. 305 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    34 N.Y.2d 879 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1974

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.