Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.15s
46 Ark. 25 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1885
Farman v. Brooks, 9 Pick., 212 . … Wood on Lim., sec. 275, et seq.; James v. James, 41 Ark., 301; Geisreiter v. Sevier, 33 ib., 534; Meyer v. Ruetmans, 28 ib., 145. In Marsh v.
Cited 25 timesPublished482 Pa. 130 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978
Brown, was convicted of murder of the first degree and criminal conspiracy in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. … To decide this issue, we will review the evidence and apply the standard which we set forth in Commonwealth v.
Cited 8 timesPublished299 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1985
Brown has some self-interest in taking the stand and wants to say well, he’s on probation and, therefore, there’s self-interest, I think that’s, in effect, overkill, because it’s obviously [sic] he’s got a self-interest. … See State v. Mains, 295 Or 640 , 669 P2d 1112 (1983); State v. Naylor, 291 Or 191 , 629 P2d 1308 (1981); State v. Van Hooser, 266 Or 19 , 511 P2d 359 (1973).
Cited 23 timesPublished24 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1893
The allegation that the defendant Brown had knowledge of and participated in the proceedings with the purpose of obtaining the land at an inadequate and unfair price, is too vague and uncertain to charge fraud; and, besides … Eddy, 4 Or. 225 ; Dolph v. Barney, 5 Or. 191; Wright v. Young, 6 Or. 87 ; McRea v. Daviner, 8 Or. 63 . Affirmed.
Cited 11 timesPublished112 Ind. 53 · Indiana Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1887
Freeman Executions, section 197; Godman v. Smith, 17 Ind. 152 ; Taylor v. Duesterberg, 109 Ind. 165 . … the value of Brown’s property.
Cited 21 timesPublished241 Kan. 1 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Mar 27, 1987
Further, in MDG Supply v. … Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co., 217 Kan. 223 , Syl. ¶ 3, 535 P.2d 873 (1975); McBride Electric, Inc. v. Putt’s Tuff, Inc., 9 Kan. App. 2d 548, 555 , 685 P.2d 316 (1984).
Cited 34 timesPublished191 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1942
Brown, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, sued William E. Higby, doing business under the name of General Investment Company, and C. R. … Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co., 170 Okla. 307 , 39 P. 2d 575 ; Fulsom v. Mason, 107 Okla. 70 , 229 P. 1072 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 P. 417 . In 128 A. L.
Cited 13 timesPublished73 Tex. Crim. 571 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 1914
(old); Hobbs v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 117; Campbell v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 33; Goode v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 520; Dunbar v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 596 , 31 S. W. Rep., 401 ; Downey v. … Rep., 856 ; Loyd v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App., 321; Lucio v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 320 , 33 S. W. Rep., 358 ; Martin v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 441 , 24 S. W. Rep., 512 ; Wright v. State, 60 Texas Crim.
Cited 7 timesPublished262 Ga. 833 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 8, 1993
Relying on DHR v. Corbin, 202 Ga. … We hold, therefore, that the admission of the autopsy photograph of which appellant complains was proper under the necessity exception in Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 862 (5) ( 302 SE2d 347 ) (1983). See also Brown v.
Cited 29 timesPublished170 A.3d 1012 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished170 A.3d 1012 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished76 Tex. Crim. 316 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 3, 1915
McGrew v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. 336 ; Fipps v. State, 36 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Jackson v. State, 48 Tex.Crim. Rep.. In the next bill it is shown while J.H. … The blood print I find on this board is shown that the point of the thumb is extra large, defective thumb on the right hand side like I described it."
Cited 6 timesPublished138 Ga. 738 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 27, 1912
Anderson v. Daniel, 137 Ga. 635 ( 73 S. E. 1051 ); Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642 ( 66 S. E. 938 ); American Standard Jewelry Co. v. Goodman, 127 Ga. 543 ( 56 S. E. 642 ). Judgment affirmed.
Cited 6 timesPublished71 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874
In Camp v. Cox, 1 D. & B., 62, it was held that a mortgagee cannot sell the equity of redemption under execution for the mortgage debt. It was doubted in that case, and also in Thompson v. … Albea v. Griffin, 2 D. & B. Eq., 9; Winton v. Fort, 5 Jones Eq., 251 .
Cited 10 timesPublished170 A.3d 1012 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna