Opinion

Bishop v. Brown

  • 138 Ga. 738
Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Filed
Sep 27, 1912
Status
Published
Author
Fish
On the bench
Fish
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 90.7%

The opinion

Fish, C. J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Anderson v. Daniel, 137 Ga. 635 ( 73 S. E. 1051 ); Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642 ( 66 S. E. 938 ); American Standard Jewelry Co. v. Goodman, 127 Ga. 543 ( 56 S. E. 642 ).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoncwr.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.