Case law

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Connecticut · May 19, 2026

. ************************************************  State v. Brown STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAMES BROWN (SC 20964) Mullins, C. … Brown State v. Brown

Brown v. White

430 So. 2d 16 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 4, 1983

Brown v. White, 405 So.2d 555 , (La.App. 4th Cir.1981). … Brown v. White, 405 So.2d 555 (La.App.1981). On original hearing this court affirmed the lower courts and specifically found that Brown was contributorily negligent. Brown v. White, 430 So.2d 16 (La.1982).

Brown v. State

95 Tex. Crim. 343 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 1923

Chivarria v. State, 63 S. W. Rep. 312 . But otherwise when there is such attack. Smith v. State, 22 Texas Crim. App. 200; Kitchen v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App. 45. … James v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep. 656 ; Bennett v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep. 52 .

Brown v. People

173 Ill. 34 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1898

Brown and William P. Bruner, late, etc., on the 25th day of May, A. … Brown and William P. Bruner. The said William R. Brown and William P.

Stone v. Brown

16 Tex. 425 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1856

Since the decision of the case of Hunt v. … (See Stone v. Godfrey, 27 English Law and Equity Rep. 324 ; and Cannon v. Hemphill, 7 Tex. R. 198 and 199, and authorities cited ; 4 Munford, 68.)

Balliet v. Brown

103 Pa. 546 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1883

Brown & Bro., as creditors, subscribed for bonds to the amount of $1,750. … Now, if these facts which appear in the testimony are true, and the transaction was unaffected by fraud, we think that as Aaron Balliet had parted with the property, in good faith, with the approval of the board of directors

Brown v. Iaukea

18 Haw. 131 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1906

L., Secs. 54-58) and the only way to change the registration list is by application to the board of registration or by app>eal from the decision of the board to the supreme court. Bev. L., Secs. 47, 50-53, 55-58. … In support of these views, see Day v. Dunning, 327 Cal. 55 ; Borders v. Williams, 155 Ind. 36 ; State v.

Duke v. Brown

113 Ga. 310 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 25, 1901

See, in this connection, Civil Code, § 2416; Park v. Barron, 20 Ga. 702 .

State v. Brown

140 Wash. 2d 456 · Washington Supreme Court · May 4, 2000

State v. … State v. Brown, 94 Wn. App. at 332 (citing State v. Eastmond, 129 Wn.2d 497, 502 , 919 P.2d 577 (1996)); see also RAP 2.5(a)(3). 67 Wn. App. at 827 . State v. Brown, 94 Wn. App. at 347 .

State v. Brown

268 Neb. 943 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2004

See, State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Perez, supra. … State v. Faust, supra. Brown argues that his trial counsel failed to cross-examine the State’s witnesses or object to unspecified evidence adduced by the State.

Dunton v. Brown

31 Mich. 182 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1875

. — Squier v. Hydliff, 9 Mich. R., 274.

Brown v. Levin

295 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1929

In Fortesque v. Carroll, 76 N. J. Eq. 583, Mr. … In Howland v. Andrus, 81 N. J.

Brown v. State

115 Neb. 325 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1927

Brown. The evidence does not show P. J. Martin, the person named as consignee, to be known by either party, or in the community of Anselmo. … Taylor v. State, 114 Neb. 257 . In the instant case, the state failed to meet this burden either by direct or circumstantial evidence, and it was error not to so instruct the jury.

Brown v. State

311 Md. 426 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1988

In Ball v. … For example, in Walsh v.

Medlock v. Brown

4 Mo. 379 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1836

The was a qui tam action, brought by against Brown to recover the penalty provided in the statqte against marrying minors, without the presence or consent of the parent or guardian.

Brown v. State

275 So. 2d 103 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1973

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS PATTERSON, Justice: This cause came on for hearing on the pro se application of Linda Sue Brown, an inmate of Parchman, for an order permitting her to file a petition for writ of … He cites in support of this motion the case of Riley v. State, 254 Miss. 487 , 182 So.2d 397 , 183 So.2d 819 (1966), as well as Mississippi Supreme Court Rule 38.

Sanders v. Brown

73 Ariz. 116 · Arizona Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1951

No. 1 v. Southwest Cotton Co., 39 Ariz. 65 , 4 P.2d 369 ; Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Sakrison, 71 Ariz. 219 , 225 P.2d 707 ; Industrial Commission of Arizona v. J. & J. Const. … Western Truck Lines, Ltd. v. Du Vuall, 57 Ariz. 199 , 122 P.2d 589 ; Southwest Cotton Co. v. Pope, 25 Ariz. 364 , 218 P. 152 ; Napier v.

Brown v. Watson

47 Me. 161 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

It was decided in Griesley v. … Heiser v. Hughes, 1 Bin., 463 . In Pittsburgh v.

Cortez v. Brown

408 So. 2d 464 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1981

Brown, Plaintiff, by and through the undersigned attorney, and presents this, her Amended Declaration, amending Paragraph V and the Prayer in such Declaration to read as follows, to-wit: V That as a direct and proximate result … In Screws v.

Price v. Brown

101 N.Y. 669 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1886