Case law

Brown v. Macey

13 Idaho 451 · Idaho Supreme Court · May 22, 1907

That case has been cited, approved and followed by the California court in Cummings v. Conlin, 66 Cal. 403 , 5 Pac. 796 ; Spots v. Hanley, 85 Cal. 156 , 24 Pac. 738 ; Langan v. … Langan, 89 Cal. 186 , 26 Pac. 764 ; Nutall v. Love joy, 90 Cal. 163 , 27 Pac. 69 ; Adams v. Helloing, 107 Cal. 298 , 40 Pac. 422 ; Haight v. Tryon, 112 Cal. 4 , 44 Pac. 318 . In Nutall v.

State v. Brown

157 Conn. 492 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 28, 1969

State v. Dennis, 150 Conn. 245, 246 , 188 A.2d 65 ; State v. Carta, 90 Conn. 79, 82 , 96 A. 411 ; State v. Maresca, 85 Conn. 509 , 83 A. 635 . … The United States Supreme Court cited the Maresca case in support of its holding in Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220, 224 , 47 S. Ct. 582 , 71 L.

Brown v. Kisner

192 Miss. 746 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1942

In the case of Young v. L. B. … Co. of Indiana et al. v.

Brown v. State

35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 348 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 17, 2010

V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. After this Court affirmed Brown’s conviction for first-degree murder and his sentence of death on direct appeal, see Brown v. … Brown v. State, 846 So.2d 1114 (Fla.2003). In 2008, Brown filed this successive motion for postconviction relief alleging newly discovered evidence, a claim under Brady v.

Gipson v. Brown

288 Ark. 422 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 31, 1986

Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215-16 (1972). … Bourgeois v. Landrum, 396 So.2d 1275 (La. 1981); Wilkerson v. Battiste, 393 So.2d 195 (La. App. 1980), rehearing denied.

Commonwealth v. Brown

169 A.3d 1083 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2017

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Connecticut · May 19, 2026

. ************************************************  State v. Brown STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAMES BROWN (SC 20964) Mullins, C. … Brown State v. Brown

Brown v. Parker

217 Ark. 700 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 16, 1950

Murray v. Jackson, 180 Ark. 1144 , 24 S. W. 2d 960 ., Jacks v. Culpepper, 183 Ark. 505 , 87 S. W. 2d 94 ; Holbrook v. Williams, 185 Ark. 885 , 50 S. W. 2d 243 ; Livingston v. Baker, 202 Ark. 1097 , 155 S. W. 2d 340 . … In Murray v.

Brown v. State

95 Tex. Crim. 343 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 1923

Chivarria v. State, 63 S. W. Rep. 312 . But otherwise when there is such attack. Smith v. State, 22 Texas Crim. App. 200; Kitchen v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App. 45. … James v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep. 656 ; Bennett v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep. 52 .

Brown v. State

198 Kan. 527 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Apr 8, 1967

The judgment and sentence attacked by the petitioner in the instant case was appealed to the Supreme Court by the petitioner after trial and appears in the reports as State v. Brown, 193 Kan. 654 , 396 P. 2d 401 . … Counsel for the petitioner rely upon Browning v. Crouse, 356 F. 2d 178 (10th Cir. 1966).

Welsh v. Brown

339 Mo. 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 20, 1936

In the late case of Ballenger et al. v. Windes, 338 Mo. 1039 , 93 S.W.2d 882 , Division One, by a divided court, overruled Tooker v. Missouri Power Light Co. and Williams v. … [Bell v. Barrett, supra; Indian Creek Land Co. v. Bradford (Mo.), 82 S.W.2d 589 .] [3] Both parties cite Swope v.

Woolsey v. . Brown

74 N.Y. 82 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1878

Brown, which was affirmed upon appeal to the General Term. Brown then appealed to this court, and gave an undertaking upon such appeal, which was executed by the defendant, a married woman, as surety. … Co. v. Babcock ; and *85 that case has never been questioned in this court, but has been uniformly followed. (Carpenter v. O'Dougherty, 50 N. Y., 660 ; Maxon v. Scott, 55 id., 247 ; Manhattan B. and M. Co. v.

Brown v. Iaukea

18 Haw. 131 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1906

L., Secs. 54-58) and the only way to change the registration list is by application to the board of registration or by app>eal from the decision of the board to the supreme court. Bev. L., Secs. 47, 50-53, 55-58. … In support of these views, see Day v. Dunning, 327 Cal. 55 ; Borders v. Williams, 155 Ind. 36 ; State v.

State v. Brown

140 Wash. 2d 456 · Washington Supreme Court · May 4, 2000

State v. … State v. Brown, 94 Wn. App. at 332 (citing State v. Eastmond, 129 Wn.2d 497, 502 , 919 P.2d 577 (1996)); see also RAP 2.5(a)(3). 67 Wn. App. at 827 . State v. Brown, 94 Wn. App. at 347 .

State v. Brown

268 Neb. 943 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2004

See, State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Perez, supra. … State v. Faust, supra. Brown argues that his trial counsel failed to cross-examine the State’s witnesses or object to unspecified evidence adduced by the State.

Commonwealth v. Brown

169 A.3d 1071 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2017

Dunton v. Brown

31 Mich. 182 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1875

. — Squier v. Hydliff, 9 Mich. R., 274.

Brown v. Levin

295 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1929

In Fortesque v. Carroll, 76 N. J. Eq. 583, Mr. … In Howland v. Andrus, 81 N. J.

Howard v. Brown

197 Mo. 36 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1906

[Smith v. Ross, 7 Mo. 463 ; State v. Martin, 10 Mo. 391 ; State v. Moore, 61 Mo. 276 ; Phillips v. *47 Evans, 64 Mo. 23 ; Skelton v. Sackett, 91 Mo. 377 ; Beckner v. McLinn, 107 Mo. 277 ; Corrigan v. … Schmidt, 126 Mo. 304 ; Turner v. Gregory, 151 Mo. 100 .]

Brown v. State

311 Md. 426 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1988

In Ball v. … For example, in Walsh v.