Case law

Brown v. Hill

284 Ill. 286 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1918

See to the same effect, Wormley v. Wormley, 207 Ill. 411 , and cases there cited. … L. 247, 248; McWhirter v. Newell, supra; Davidson v. Reed, supra.

Brown v. State

271 Ind. 129 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1979

Following a jury trial in the Gibson Circuit Court, appellant Brown was found guilty of kidnapping, armed robbery and robbery. … Brown contends that all of this evidence should have been excluded because it was obtained from him without a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights.

Gillingham v. Brown

178 Mass. 417 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 3, 1901

Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. 351 . Jones v. Moore, 5 Binn. 573 . Berghaus v. Calhoun, 6 Watts, 219 . Sands v. Gelston, 15 Johns. 511 . Danforth v. Culver, 11 Johns. 146 . Purdy v. Austin, 3 Wend. 187 . … J. in Clark v.

Sexsmith v. Brown

61 Wash. 164 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1910

release Brown from any further obligation on said note and mortgage — and that in pui’suance of such an agreement Brown delivered the horses and harness to Sexsmith for the purpose of extinguishing the debt evidenced by … the note, and that Sexsmith accepted the property for the same purpose, then I instruct you that the note and mortgage would be fully paid and satisfied, and your verdict should be for the defendant, Brown.

Brown v. State

841 A.2d 1116 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Mar 3, 2004

See State v. Yanez, 716 A.2d 759, 767 (R.I.1998); State v. Bryant, 670 A.2d 776, 783 (R.I.1996). … See Carpenter v.

State v. Brown

370 So. 2d 525 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 9, 1979

370 So.2d 525 (1979) STATE of Louisiana v. Michael T. BROWN. No. 63260. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 9, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 21, 1979. *526 L. Paul Gianfala, Church Point, for defendant-appellant. William J. … State v. Parker, supra . See also State v. Bourg, 332 So.2d 235 (La.1976); State v. Thomas, 310 So.2d 517 (La.1975); State v. Terracina, 309 So.2d 271 (La.1975).

Brown v. State

828 S.W.2d 762 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 20, 1991

Brown v. State, 800 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990). … In Sodipo v.

State v. Brown

813 S.E.2d 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2018

People v. Brown

406 Mich. 215 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1979

Brown of carrying a machete, a dangerous weapon, in a motor vehicle. I caution you, we aré not accusing him of carrying this machete for any unlawful purpose. Only the fact that he was carrying it in a motor vehicle.” … Our hope is that the Supreme Court will supplant Smith with a reaffirmation of [People v Vaines, 310 Mich 500 ; 17 NW2d 729 (1945)].

Brown v. People

39 Mich. 57 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1878

In Nelson v.

Brown v. Phillips

40 Mich. 264 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1879

Brown, Sarah E. Brown, Caroline Wilson, Abigail Davis, Jemima J. Munger, and Mary Phillips, wife of defendant in error. Of these heirs Thomas S. Brown, Sarah E. Brown, Emeline A. Brown and Caroline Wilson are parties. … Brown and he thus became owner of two shares. February 17, 1868, the widow, Thomas S. Brown, Sarah E. Brown and Caroline Wilson quit-claimed their interests to Wier L. Drake.

State v. Brown

283 Ark. 304 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1984

Appellee Levert Brown was charged with violating Act 549 of 1983 [Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 75-2501 — 75-2533 (Supp. 1983)], driving while intoxicated (D.W.I.), fourth offense. … See Finch v. State, 262 Ark. 313 , 556 S.W.2d 434 (1977) and Silas v. State, 232 Ark. 248 , 337 S.W.2d 644 (1960). The trial court erred in refusing to allow the state to amend the information.

Durham v. Brown

24 Ill. 93 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1860

Drumm v. Brown

245 Conn. 657 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 28, 1998

Michael Brown, Robert J. Carroll, George H. Henning-sen, Robert T. Winter and Richard A. … Halpern v. Board of Education, 196 Conn. 647, 652-53 , 495 A.2d 264 (1985); militates in favor of abstaining without regard to any possible exceptions to that doctrine.

Brown v. State

34 Ark. 232 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1879

In McPherson v. … In Winkler v.

State v. Brown

327 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 26, 1990

State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 53 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 819 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1165 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986). The trial court thus did not err in excusing these jurors for cause. State v. … Brown and Hopper did it? A. That is what I had heard. Q. That was a week or two weeks after the killing? A. Yes, sir.

Brown v. State

755 So. 2d 616 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 9, 2000

See Brown, 565 So.2d at 308 . Brown also notes that, subsequent *622 to Brown, the United States Supreme Court in Espinosa v. Florida, 505 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 2926 , 120 L.Ed.2d 854 (1992), and Hodges v. … In Pope v.

Brown v. Brown

71 Wis. 2d 355 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1976

Rooney v. Rooney (1925), 186 Wis. 49 , 202 N. W. 143 .

People v. Brown

99 N.Y.2d 488 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2003

To support his argument, he points to our observation in People v Collins ( 82 NY2d 177 [1993]) that the exclusion for pretrial motions under CPL 30.30 (4) (a) “generally refers to delays attributable to responding to and … Specifically, defendant contends that the People were not entitled to the charge because it was never shown that his half brother was in his “control” (see People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428-429 [1986]).

Main v. Brown

72 Tex. 505 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1889

On the 29th day of May, 1863, Brown was also appointed, by the same court, guardian of the persons and estates of the minor legatees. … In support of his position he cites the cases of Michael Murphy, Administrator, v. Menard et al., 14 Texas, 62 ; Portis v. Cummings, Id., 139 ; and Marks v. Hill, 46 Texas, 350 . The case of Murphy v.