Opinion

Durham v. Brown

  • 24 Ill. 93
Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 15, 1860
Status
Published
Author
Breese
On the bench
Breese
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.3%

The opinion

Breese, J. There was no affidavit filed with the clerk, proving the execution of the power of attorney to confess the judgment. The statute provides that judgment by confession may be entered in certain courts, of which the Circuit Court of DeKalb is one, at any time in vacation, before the clerk, by filing the proper papers with the clerk, and such judgment shall have the same force and effect, from the time of entry, as if entered in term time. When the proper papers are filed, they become a part of the record, and no bill of exceptions is necessary to bring them before this court — they are on the record. This is the meaning of the statute. When the confession is by an attorney, one of the proper and indispensable papers would be the poAver of attorney. ■ There was none in this case, and the statement that it was proved, is riot sufficient.

We do not regard such confessions taken by the clerk in vacation as a judicial act. They are merely conclusions of law on contracts acknowledged of record, and so far as public convenience is concerned, avoiding expense and protracted litigation, should be encouraged.

For the want of the power of attorney, there being none filed, the judgment is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.