Case law

Yates v. Brown

275 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1969

In Sykes v. … Davidson v. Powell was not cited in either Medlin v. Miles or Evans v. Freeman. While the language of the indorsement in Medlin v. Miles and in Evans v.

Brown v. Henderson

285 Mass. 192 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 12, 1934

Brown, then the presumption controls. When evidence is introduced then you are to consider the evidence. … Bagnell v. Boston Elevated Railway, 247 Mass. 235, 238 . Ferris v. Ray Taxi Service Co. 259 Mass. 401 . Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway, 269 Mass. 420, 424 . Mahoney v.

Lublin v. Brown

168 Conn. 212 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 25, 1975

Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. *223 563, 573 [ 30 S. Ct. 578 , 54 L. Ed. 883 ].’ ... … Kellems v. Brown, 163 Conn. 478, 490 , 313 A.2d 53 .

Norris v. Brown

154 S.C. 138 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jan 16, 1930

State v. Brown

26 Wash. 2d 857 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1947

Brown and Johnson are appellants in the present proceeding. … State v. Currie; 200 Wash. 699 , 94 P. (2d) 754 ; State v. Nelson, 6 Wn. (2d) 190, 107 P. (2d) 1113 ; State v. Hampson, 9 Wn. (2d) 278, 114 P. (2d) 992 ; State v. Conners, 12 Wn. (2d) 128, 120 P. *863 (2d) 1002.

Brown v. State

150 Tex. Crim. 386 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1946

, to-wit, on the 19th day of July, 1943, in the County Court of Young County, Texas, in cause No. 5607, was duly convicted,’ etc.; and, *388 “It will be noted that the judgment recites ‘Foster Brown waived a jury. … See Sigler v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 220 , 157 S. W. (2d) 903 . The judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. Warram

3 H. & J. 572 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 15, 1815

Brown v. State

228 Ga. 215 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 7, 1971

State, supra; Flanagan v. State, 103 Ga. 619 ( 30 SE 550 ); Taylor v. State, 105 Ga. 746 ( 31 SE 764 ); Allams v. State, 123 Ga. 500 ( 51 SE 506 ); Rozier v. … Mars v. State, 163 Ga. 43 ( 135 SE 410 ); McKinnon v. State, 51 Ga. App. 549 ( 181 SE 91 ); Choice v. State, 31 Ga. 424, 478 ; Hill v. State, 64 Ga. 453 (3a).’ See also Mullins v.

Sandoval v. Brown

66 N.M. 235 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1959

McMinn v. Thompson, supra, holds nothing more nor less than that under the rule of Williams v. Haas, supra, and Curtis v. … The case of Terry v.

Vetzel v. Brown

86 So. 2d 138 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 2, 1956

VETZEL and Florence Vetzel, his wife, Appellants, v. Howell L. BROWN, Marjorie D. Brown, his wife, Melvin R. Wilson, Ermal L. Wilson, his wife, Robert W. Christy, Connie W. Christy, his wife, Harold A. … .; Oosterhouse v. Brummel, 1955, 343 Mich. 283 , 72 N.W.2d 6 ; Maxwell v. Smith, 1955, S.C. 89 S.E.2d 280 ; Bullock v. Steinmil Realty, 1 Misc.2d 46 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 331 ; O'Neil v.

Bonds v. Brown

133 Ga. 451 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 17, 1909

In the case of Evans v. … In Draper v. Medlock, 122 Ga. 234 ( 50 S. E. 113 , 69 L. R.

Brown v. State

148 Ga. 264 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 11, 1918

Jim Brown was convicted of the offense of murder, and, upon recommendation of the jury,- was sentenced to life imprisonment. He moved for a new trial, which was refused him, and he excepted.

Brown v. Wyman

56 Iowa 452 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 18, 1881

Brown v. Owen

94 Ind. 31 · Indiana Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1884

See Paxton v. Dye, 26 Ind. 393 ; Fogleman v. State, 32 Ind. 145 . Finding no available error in the record the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Staats v. Brown

139 Wash. 2d 757 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2000

Tommy P. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 97 Wn.2d 385, 391-92 , 645 P.2d 697 (1982); State ex rel. Royal v. Board of Yakima County Comm’rs, 123 Wn.2d 451, 459-60 , 869 P.2d 56 (1994). … We require Brown, as a peace officer, to be aware of the rules and statutes governing arrest. See Maynard Inv. Co. v.

State v. Brown

119 Mo. 527 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 31, 1894

Justice StboNG in Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. … State v. Anderson, 89 Mo. 332 ; 1 S. W. Rep. 135 ; State v. Bryant, 102 Mo. 24 ; 14 S. W. Rep. 822 ; State v. Turlington, 102 Mo. 642 ; 15 S. W. Rep. 141 ; State v. Nelson, 118 Mo. 124 ; 23 S. W. Rep. 1088 .

Yarlott v. Brown

192 Ind. 648 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1923

Bwrnes V. Simpson, supra. … . *655 Middleton v. Greeson, Trustee (1886), 106 Ind. 18, 28 , 5 N. E. 755 ; Ex parte Brown (1906), 166 Ind. 593, 608, 609 , 78 N. E. 553 ; Taylor v. State, ex rel. (1907), 168 Ind. 294, 297, 298 , 80 N. E. 849 .

Brown v. People

36 Mich. 203 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1877

.— Burt v. The State, 23 Ohio St., 394 . … —Com. v. McDonald, 110 Mass., 405 ; State v. Burgdorf, 53 Mo., 65 ; People v. Brown, 47 Cal., 447 . The circuit judge gave several instructions on this part of the case, and most of which were unobjectionable.

Manning v. Brown

47 Md. 506 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 28, 1878

Brown, for life. … Brown, the husband, of Corrilla, and Hall Brown, his brother, by the direction and authority of Corrilla, entered the room thus occupied by the plaintiff, without his permission and against his protest, and took therefrom

Plummer v. Brown

64 Cal. 429 · California Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1884

Per Curiam. think that Martha Brown and Thom, after acquiring the entire interest of the defendant in the subject-matter of this action, were his “legal representatives” within the meaning of the phrase as used in section … Co. v. Bryan, 8 Smedes & M. 275 .) They certainly had acquired the right to represent him.