Opinion

Brown v. Warram

  • 3 H. & J. 572
Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Filed
Jun 15, 1815
Status
Published
Author
Johnson
On the bench
Eociianan, Johnson, Martin
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.9%

The opinion

Johnson, J.

The defendant could not, to defeat the action on the general issue, rely on the note being joint, but if he intended to avail himself of that circumstance he ought to have pleaded it in abatement. For the note being joint did not prove that the defendant had not assumed, and assumed, although another also assumed;-there was no variance of course between the allegata and probata.

JUSGMENT REVERSE», &üj

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.