Case law

Brown v. . Foust

64 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

Treasury notes, at the time of the verdict: Garrett v. Smith, ante 93.

Justus v. Brown

42 Ohio St. 2d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1975

In connection with these two sections, it was fittingly pointed out by Justice Stern as obiter dictum in his opinion for a unanimous court in the case of DeLong v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. R. C. 3319.07 reads: “The board of education of each city, exempted village, and local school district shall employ the teachers of the public schools of their respective districts.

Brown v. Scofield

124 Wash. 273 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1923

Heintz v. Brown, 46 Wash. 387 , 90 Pac. 211 , 123 Am. St. 937; Worthington v. Crapser, 63 Wash. 380 , 115 Pac. 849 ; Katterhagen v. … Brown at the time of his marriage.

Brown v. Pittsburgh

409 Pa. 357 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1962

Brown, on January 26, 1959, fell and was seriously injured while walking on the sidewalk in front of the East Liberty Presbyterian Church (Church) in the City of Pittsburgh. On October 12,1960, Helen L. … Brown and her husband, Charles F.

Galen v. . Brown

22 N.Y. 37 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1860

is in possession, and is entitled to the possession for a definite period, that the chattels mortgaged may be seized upon execution against the mortgagor, or that the latter has any leviable interest therein. ( Mattison v. … Baucus, 1 Comst., 295; Hull v. Carnley, 1 Kern., 501.)

Freed v. Brown

55 Ind. 310 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1876

Brown v. Freed, supra., on p. 254. … Brown v. Freed, supra, on p. 257.

Zerby v. Brown

280 Minn. 514 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 28, 1968

Brown” and thereupon granted Zerby’s adoption petition. … Brown objected, in any event, to conducting any hearing on the adoption petition at the same time as a hearing for the termination of the parental rights. He relies upon Wilson v. Barnet, 275 Minn. 32 , 144 N.

State v. Brown

320 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

See State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 180 , 293 S.E. 2d 569, 588 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982). … Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (victims stabbed repeatedly, then disemboweled); State v.

People v. Brown

25 N.Y.2d 374 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1969

(See People v. Sine, 277 App. Div. 908 ; see, also, Denzer and McQuillan, Practice Commentary Penal Law, § 140.00 *377 [McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 39, part 1, pp. 340, 342].) … Since the People thus failed in their burden of proving each and every element of the crime charged, and, specifically, the absence or loss of a statutory privilege or license to enter and remain (see People v.

Wood v. . Brown

34 N.Y. 337 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1866

In Seaman v. Durea ( 11 N. … (Williams on Ex., 1548; Langford v. Gascon, 11 Vesey, 335; Clark v. Clark, 8 Paige, 152 .)

Brown v. Kennedy

141 Ohio St. 457 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1943

That she was attending Wilmington College at said time, and using said automobile to go to and from her home in Hamersville, Brown county, Ohio.

Runals v. Brown

11 Wis. 185 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1860

Ashley v. . Brown

198 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1930

Ed., 1149 ; Wilkinson v. Wright, 1 N. C., 422 ; Peace v. Nailing, 16 N. C., 289, 296 ; Merwin v. Ballard, 66 N. C., 398 ; Greer v. Asheville, 114 N. C., 678 ; Mann v. Allen, 171 N. C., 219 ; Waddill v. Masten, 172 N. … See Poti v. N. E. Road Machinery Co., 140 Vt., 587 ; S. v. Johnston, 79 N. J. L., 49, 74 At., 538 ; Kane v. State, 81 N. J. L., 594, 80 At., 453 ; Kane v. New Jersey, 242 U. S., 160 , 62 L. Ed., 222 .

Malins v. . Brown

4 N.Y. 403 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1850

.; 3 Atk . 1; Carman v. Cooke, 1 Sch. Lef . 40.) In Wetmore v. White, (2 Cai. Cas. in Err . 109,) it was assumed, that payment of the consideration entitled the party to a specific performance.

Eddy v. Brown

715 P.2d 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1986

Brown, Jr. [Brown] and his foreman, Dallas D. Wilson, Jr. [Wilson], all of whom will be called collectively “employer,” for the tort of outrage 1 and invasion of privacy. … rest on a scenario unfolded by these facts: [1] Texaco did not efficiently handle his workers’ compensation claim; [2] Texaco was negatively disposed towards him because of his complaint with the National Labor Relations Board

State v. Brown

253 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1960

The principles of law applied by this Court in State v. Wilson, 216 N.C. 130 , 4 S.E. 2d 440 , are controlling on this appeal. … State v. Wilson, supra. ■ *197 The judgment of July 1960 recites that the court heard evidence “of the State and the defendant.”

Brown v. Westerfield

47 Neb. 399 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1896

(Byington v. Moore, 62 Ia., 470 ; Hinson v. Bailey, 73 Ia., 544 ; Black v. Hoyt, 33 O. St., 203; Lessee of Mitchell v. Ryan, 3 O. St., 377; Albright v. Albright, 70 Wis., 528 ; Ball v. Foreman, 37 O. … (Bunz v. Cornelius, 19 Neb., 107 ; Connell v. Galligher, 39 Neb., 793 .)

Brown v. Smith

141 Tex. 425 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1943

Brown and W. R. … Brown and W. R.

Brown v. Babcock

3 Mass. 29 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 15, 1807

Roulhac v. . Brown

87 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1882

Peebles v. Foote, 83 N. C., 102 . … Sanderson v. Daily, 83 N. C., 67 ; Mabry v. Henry, 83 N. C., 298 . A case in point is State v. Evans, 74 N. C., 324 , where a prisoner was-put in jail for larceny, and the jury not being able to agree were discharged.