Opinion

Brown v. . Foust

  • 64 N.C. 672
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Jun 5, 1870
Status
Published
Author
Hick
On the bench
Hick
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 98.0%

The opinion

Hick, J.

The Confederate money was received by the obligee, and such payment discharged the bond pro

tanto.

The bond was given for a negro girl, and the value of the balance of the contract is regulated by the acts of 1866, chs. 38 and 39. The jury upon the proof, should have estimated

*673

in gold, the value of the negro girl at the time of the contract, and deducted therefrom an amount which bore the same proportion to such value as the payments did to the sum specified in the bond, and then added to such gold balance, the depreciation of U. S. Treasury notes, at the time of the verdict:

Garrett

v.

Smith, ante

93.

As for instance, if the amount of the bond had been fifteen hundred dollars, and the payments had been five hundred dollars, one-third of the bond would have been discharged, and one-third should have been deducted from the gold value of the property.

The instructions of his Honor were erroneous, and there must be a

venire de novo.

Let this be certified.

Per Curiam.

Venire de novo.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.