Opinion

Runals v. Brown

  • 11 Wis. 185
Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 4, 1860
Status
Published
Author
Cole
On the bench
Cole
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.7%

The opinion

By the Court,

Cole, J.

This case must follow the decision in the case of Rines vs. Boyd et al., 7 Wis., 155. We there held that it was the imperative duty of the circuit court to remove the cause when the prescribed petition was presented. It is true the application in that case was made under chapter 51, General Laws, 1853, but that statute has been substantially embraced in chapter 123, R. S., under which the application in the present case was made. The petition for the change of the place of trial was in conformity to the statute, and the application should have been granted.

The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings, in accordance with this decision.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.