Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.57s
244 F.2d 543 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 7, 1957
As correctly stated by appellants in their brief, this paragraph was designed, at least in part, to modify or overrule such decisions as Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Walker, 329 U. … We therefore sustain the board’s rejection of this claim.
Cited 18 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012
See, e.g., Hayes v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 60, 66 (1993); Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997). … See Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished11 B.T.A. 193 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 26, 1928
CRAIG, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Craig v. Commissioner Docket No. 9819. … See Donnelly v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 14, 2021
The Board notes that the lay assertions of record have been considered. See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994). … See Jones v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 134, 137-138 (1994). As such, the lay statements do not provide any basis upon which to grant an earlier effective date.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished173 F.2d 986 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 12, 1949
See Patterson et al. v. Clements et al., 136 F.2d 1002 , 30 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1262. Edgar W. … Petersen v. Thomas, 56 App.D.C. 113, 10 . F.2d 908; Schweyer v. Thomas, 68 F.2d 953 , 21 C.C. P.A., Patents, 859.
Cited 12 timesPublished167 F.2d 1003 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 6, 1948
Brogden v. Henry B. Slater, 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1240, 40 E. (2d) 988, 5 U. S. Pat. Q. 145, and Neumair v. Malocsay, 22 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1349, 77 F. (2d) 622, 25 U. S. Pat. Q. 468. … See Brand v. Thomas, 25 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1053, 96 F. (2d) 301, 37 USPQ 505 .
Cited 2 timesPublished23 C.C.P.A. 288 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 27, 1936
The trial court, in an opinion by Judge Brown, stated that “No commercial designation to the contrary is made out, though attempted”. … The importer on this phase of the case cites and discusses Clickman v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 151 , T. D. 38946.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 Pa. D. & C.2d 785 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Sep 18, 1957
See Lloyd v. Smith, 176 Pa. 213, 218 , 35 Atl. 199 (1896), and eases cited therein. . Commonwealth ex rel. Fertig v. Patton, 88 Pa. 258 (1878); Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Gumbert, 256 Pa. 531 , 100 Atl. 990 (1917). . … Haverford Township v. Siegle, 346 Pa. 1 , 28 A. 2d 786 (1942). . See Loomis v. Philadelphia School District Board of Education, 376 Pa. 428 , 103 A. 2d 769 (1954); Terenzio v.
Cited 0 timesPublished109 F. Supp. 712 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953
Under our decisions in Lezin v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 724 , 98 F. Supp. 574 ; Jackson v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 405 ; and Mendez v. United States, 119 C. … Neither the case of Garcia v. United States, No. 50459, decided December 2, 1952, nor Wheeler v. United States, No. 74-52, decided December 2, 1952, involve the point discussed above.
Cited 6 timesPublished123 Fed. Cl. 174 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2015
(ADRB) in 2002 and the Army Board [for] Correction [of] Military Records (ABCMR or board) in 2003, Mr. … Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974), abrogated on other grounds by Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982); Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 747 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
Cited 9 timesPublishedStockton East Water District v. United States
76 Fed. Cl. 470 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2007
Co. v. … Control Board in 1988.
Cited 16 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015
See Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See e.g., Richard v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 266, 267 (1996); Carpenter v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 240 (1995).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished74 F.2d 306 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 7, 1935
C. 321; Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corporation v. The Butler Co., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 934, 39 F. (2d) 693; 34 C. J. Secs. 1154, et seq. … Plummer v. Sargent, 120 U. S. 442 -448. This conclusion is entirely consistent with the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · May 28, 2021
Kitchens v. Brown,7 Vet. App. 320, 324 (1995). … Brown v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 413, 419 (1993).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRick D. Salerno v. Department of the Interior
2016 MSPB 10 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 22, 2016
Webb v. … The Board does not have jurisdiction to hear a claim of harmful procedural error in the context of an IRA appeal. Hooker v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 120 M.S.P.R. 629, ¶ 5 (2014); Garrett v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States
7 Cl. Ct. 549 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1985
to be made to the plaintiff by the Maritime Subsidy Board. … Services, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 257, 260 (1984); Thoen v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 823, 825 (1984); Milmark Services, Inc. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 954, 956 (1982). See also Troup Bros. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 3, 2024
Satterfield & Pontikes Constr., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 59980, 62301, 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,873 at 183,908 (quoting Chapman Law Firm Co. v. Greenleaf Constr. Co., 490 F.3d 934, 939 (Fed. Cir. 2007)). … , Appeal of Quality Trust, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished71 T.C. 477 · United States Tax Court · Dec 28, 1978
We are reminded of Judge Brown’s statement in Parr v. … Had the Treasury Department followed Judge Brown’s suggestion and replaced the “primary purpose” test of the regulation with the quid pro quo test set out in Johnson v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedUnited States v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.
1 Ct. Cust. 362 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1911
Evidence was taken before the board. One of the samples sent to the board, as before stated, and which weighed a little less than a pound, was tested by the examiner of rice for the port of New York. … Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that the principle established in United States v. Ranlett ( 172 U. S., 133 ) may well be applied here.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPowertronic Systems Florida, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 10, 2021
Miller, Inc. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 455 (1963). … Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62174, Appeal of Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna