Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • In re Lundberg

    244 F.2d 543 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 7, 1957

    As correctly stated by appellants in their brief, this paragraph was designed, at least in part, to modify or overrule such decisions as Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Walker, 329 U. … We therefore sustain the board’s rejection of this claim.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • 08-11 362

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012

    See, e.g., Hayes v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 60, 66 (1993); Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997). … See Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Craig v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 193 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 26, 1928

    CRAIG, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Craig v. Commissioner Docket No. 9819. … See Donnelly v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 191102-43882

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 14, 2021

    The Board notes that the lay assertions of record have been considered. See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994). … See Jones v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 134, 137-138 (1994). As such, the lay statements do not provide any basis upon which to grant an earlier effective date.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kendall v. Searles

    173 F.2d 986 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 12, 1949

    See Patterson et al. v. Clements et al., 136 F.2d 1002 , 30 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1262. Edgar W. … Petersen v. Thomas, 56 App.D.C. 113, 10 . F.2d 908; Schweyer v. Thomas, 68 F.2d 953 , 21 C.C. P.A., Patents, 859.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re Hatch

    167 F.2d 1003 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 6, 1948

    Brogden v. Henry B. Slater, 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1240, 40 E. (2d) 988, 5 U. S. Pat. Q. 145, and Neumair v. Malocsay, 22 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1349, 77 F. (2d) 622, 25 U. S. Pat. Q. 468. … See Brand v. Thomas, 25 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1053, 96 F. (2d) 301, 37 USPQ 505 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gavin

    23 C.C.P.A. 288 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 27, 1936

    The trial court, in an opinion by Judge Brown, stated that “No commercial designation to the contrary is made out, though attempted”. … The importer on this phase of the case cites and discusses Clickman v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 151 , T. D. 38946.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Local Health Programs

    11 Pa. D. & C.2d 785 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Sep 18, 1957

    See Lloyd v. Smith, 176 Pa. 213, 218 , 35 Atl. 199 (1896), and eases cited therein. . Commonwealth ex rel. Fertig v. Patton, 88 Pa. 258 (1878); Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Gumbert, 256 Pa. 531 , 100 Atl. 990 (1917). . … Haverford Township v. Siegle, 346 Pa. 1 , 28 A. 2d 786 (1942). . See Loomis v. Philadelphia School District Board of Education, 376 Pa. 428 , 103 A. 2d 769 (1954); Terenzio v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Getzoff v. United States

    109 F. Supp. 712 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

    Under our decisions in Lezin v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 724 , 98 F. Supp. 574 ; Jackson v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 405 ; and Mendez v. United States, 119 C. … Neither the case of Garcia v. United States, No. 50459, decided December 2, 1952, nor Wheeler v. United States, No. 74-52, decided December 2, 1952, involve the point discussed above.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. United States

    123 Fed. Cl. 174 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2015

    (ADRB) in 2002 and the Army Board [for] Correction [of] Military Records (ABCMR or board) in 2003, Mr. … Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974), abrogated on other grounds by Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982); Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 747 (Fed. Cir. 1988).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Stockton East Water District v. United States

    76 Fed. Cl. 470 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2007

    Co. v. … Control Board in 1988.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • 10-26 316

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015

    See Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See e.g., Richard v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 266, 267 (1996); Carpenter v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 240 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re Becker

    74 F.2d 306 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 7, 1935

    C. 321; Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corporation v. The Butler Co., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 934, 39 F. (2d) 693; 34 C. J. Secs. 1154, et seq. … Plummer v. Sargent, 120 U. S. 442 -448. This conclusion is entirely consistent with the decision of the Primary Examiner.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • 191007-41057

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 28, 2021

    Kitchens v. Brown,7 Vet. App. 320, 324 (1995). … Brown v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 413, 419 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rick D. Salerno v. Department of the Interior

    2016 MSPB 10 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 22, 2016

    Webb v. … The Board does not have jurisdiction to hear a claim of harmful procedural error in the context of an IRA appeal. Hooker v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 120 M.S.P.R. 629, ¶ 5 (2014); Garrett v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

    7 Cl. Ct. 549 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1985

    to be made to the plaintiff by the Maritime Subsidy Board. … Services, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 257, 260 (1984); Thoen v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 823, 825 (1984); Milmark Services, Inc. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 954, 956 (1982). See also Troup Bros. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Quality Trust, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 3, 2024

    Satterfield & Pontikes Constr., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 59980, 62301, 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,873 at 183,908 (quoting Chapman Law Firm Co. v. Greenleaf Constr. Co., 490 F.3d 934, 939 (Fed. Cir. 2007)). … , Appeal of Quality Trust, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Commissioner

    71 T.C. 477 · United States Tax Court · Dec 28, 1978

    We are reminded of Judge Brown’s statement in Parr v. … Had the Treasury Department followed Judge Brown’s suggestion and replaced the “primary purpose” test of the regulation with the quid pro quo test set out in Johnson v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • United States v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.

    1 Ct. Cust. 362 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1911

    Evidence was taken before the board. One of the samples sent to the board, as before stated, and which weighed a little less than a pound, was tested by the examiner of rice for the port of New York. … Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that the principle established in United States v. Ranlett ( 172 U. S., 133 ) may well be applied here.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 10, 2021

    Miller, Inc. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 455 (1963). … Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62174, Appeal of Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.