The opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of - )
)
Quality Trust, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62576
)
Under Contract No. FA2517-19-P-A083 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Lawrence M. Ruiz
President
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Caryl A. Potter, III, Esq.
Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney
Jason R. Smith, Esq.
Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STINSON ON THE
GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE APPEAL AS MOOT
Appellant Quality Trust, Inc. (QTI), appeals from a contracting officer’s
termination of QTI’s contract for default. The government requests dismissal of the
appeal as moot. QTI filed no response to the government’s motion. We dismiss the
appeal as moot.
STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF MOTION
1. The Department of the Air Force awarded Contract No. FA2517-19-P-A083
to QTI on September 28, 2019, valued at $179,000. This contract was for “all labor,
materials, transportation, disposal, and supervision to replace four (4) walk-in
refrigerators and one (1) freezer at Aragon Dining Facility” at Peterson Air Force Base
in Colorado under a single contract line item number. (R4, tab 3 at 1, 3). The contract
incorporated Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-4, CONTRACT TERMS
AND CONDITIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2018), which incorporated
FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES (MAY 2014) by reference (id. at 11).
2. On March 9, 2020, the Air Force terminated QTI’s contract for cause (R4,
tab 76 at 1, 77 at 1). QTI timely appealed the termination.
3. Appellant’s notice of appeal of its termination for cause included a “total
amount in dispute” of approximately $323,000. Appellant had not filed a certified
claim for the $323,000, and on October 29, 2020, the government filed a motion for
partial dismissal. On January 12, 2021, appellant responded to the motion agreeing to
the partial dismissal. Accordingly, by Order dated February 18, 2021, the Board
dismissed that portion of the appeal relating to the $323,000 without prejudice.
Quality Trust, Inc., ASBCA No. 62576, 2021 WL 934902 (Feb. 18, 2021) (order of
partial dismissal). The government’s termination for cause remained before the Board.
4. On May 15, 2024, the contracting officer issued Modification No. P00005,
converting the “complete termination for cause . . . to a termination for convenience”
(gov’t mot. ex.).
5. On May 16, 2024, the government filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as
moot.
6. Appellant did not submit a response to the government’s motion, and by
Order dated June 18, 2024, the Board informed the parties:
Board Rule 7(d) provides that a non-moving party has
30 days from receipt of a motion to file its response.
Accordingly, appellant’s response to the government’s
motion was due to be filed no later than June 17, 2024.
The Recorder’s Office has no record of receiving a
response from appellant. Appellant is ORDERED to file
its response to the government’s motion no later than
June 25, 2024.
(Bd. corr. ltr. dtd. June 25, 2024)
7. Appellant did not submit a response to the government’s motion as required
by our June 18, 2024, Order.
DECISION
“An appeal should be dismissed as moot ‘[w]hen, during the course of
litigation, it develops that the relief sought has been granted or that the questions
originally in controversy between the parties are no longer at issue.’” Satterfield &
Pontikes Constr., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 59980, 62301, 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,873 at 183,908
(quoting Chapman Law Firm Co. v. Greenleaf Constr. Co., 490 F.3d 934, 939 (Fed.
Cir. 2007)).
The government’s motion states that “[a]s a result of such unconditional action
by the Contacting Officer, there is no issue left for the Board to adjudicate and the
appeal should be dismissed as moot” (gov’t mot. at 1). We agree. Because the
government converted its termination of QTI’s contract for cause to one for the
convenience of the government (SOF ¶ 4), there remains nothing for this Board to
adjudicate. Am. Best Constr. Co., ASBCA No. 62146, 19-1 BCA ¶ 37,450.
2
CONCLUSION
For these reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed
as moot.
Dated: July 3, 2024
DAVID B. STINSON
Administrative Judge
Armed Services Board
of Contract Appeals
I concur I concur
OWEN C. WILSON MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge
Acting Chairman Vice Chairman
Armed Services Board Armed Services Board
of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62576, Appeal of Quality
Trust, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Dated: July 3, 2024
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS
Recorder, Armed Services
Board of Contract Appeals
3