Case law

National Fire Ins. Co. v. United States

52 F.2d 1011 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

In Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 144 , 69 Ct. Cl. 158 , and Arthur Curtiss James v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 140 , 69 Ct. … See Bonwit Teller So Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 258 , 51 S. Ct. 395 , 75 L. Ed. 1018 .

In Re Tri-State Water Rights Litigation

481 F. Supp. 2d 1351 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Mar 20, 2007

Plaintiff State of Alabama (Alabama) and intervenor plaintiffs in the Alabama action — The Alabama Power Co. and the Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer Board of the City of Montgomery, Alabama (Montgomery Board) — oppose centralization … No. 1:90—1331 Northern District of Florida State of Florida v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, et al., C.A. No. 4:06—410 Northern District of Georgia State of Georgia v.

Urschel v. Crawford

73 F.2d 510 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 3, 1934

Thompson v. Fawick, 20 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 953, 956, 64 F. (2d) 125. … One of our latest expressions is to be found in. the case of Trumbull et al. v. Kirschbraun, 21 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 758, 67 F. (2d) 974.

Voisinet v. Coglianese

455 F.2d 1064 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 9, 1972

See Knowles v. Tibbetts, 52 CCPA 1800, 347 F.2d 591 , 146 USPQ 59 (1965); White v. Lemmerman, 52 CCPA 968, 341 F.2d 110 , 144 USPQ 409 (1965). … We conclude that the board was correct in holding the testing to be adequate.

ADAMIAK

23 I. & N. Dec. 878 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2006

See also Pinho v. … See, e.g., United States v.

RIVERA

21 I. & N. Dec. 599 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996

See INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985); Reid v. INS, 766 F.2d 113 (3d Cir. 1985); Cheng Fan Kwok v. INS, 381 F.2d 542 (3d Cir. 1967), aff’d, 392 U.S. 206 (1968). … Figeroa v. United States INS, supra, at 79.

Zucca v. United States

10 Ct. Cust. 133 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 13, 1920

A like question was involved in United States v. Vitelli & Son ( 5 Ct. Cust. Appls., 151 ; T. D. 34194), and Vitelli & Son v. United States ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 243 ; T. … See United States v. Vitelli (39 U. S. Sup. Ct. Rep., 544; T. D. 38179).

Santa Fe, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,385 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 30, 1987

As we stated in Tapper & Associates v. … Maffei Building Wrecking Corp. v.

06-00 515

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

See Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 368 (2005); see also Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). … See also Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1994); Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 229 (1993); EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 324 (1991).

Application of Thunderbird Products Corporation

406 F.2d 1389 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 6, 1969

In DeWalt, Inc. v. … It would appear, therefore, that the board was considering the issue of registrability against the factual situation prevailing in 1961 at the time the problem was before the board rather than against the factual situation

A-E-M

21 I. & N. Dec. 1157 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1998

Huaman-Cornelio v. Board of Immigration Appeals, supra; see also Osorio v. INS, supra; Sotelo-Aquije v. Slattery, supra. … Sotelo-Aquije v. Slattery, supra, at 37; see also Carranza-Hernandez v. INS, 12 F.3d 4, 7-8 (2d Cir. 1993); Huaman-Cornelio v. Board of Immigration Appeals, supra.

Siemens Government Technologies, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 8, 2024

ORDER OF DISMISSAL By Order entered on July 25, 2024, the United States Court of Federal Claims directed the transfer of ASBCA No. 62806 to its docket for further processing in Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. v. … GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Attachment

Application of Shao Wen Yuan

188 F.2d 377 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 3, 1951

Robinson on Patents, 1890 Edition, Vol. 1, page 230, citing the Cochrane v. … Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v.

Gilmore v. Commissioner

25 T.C. 1321 · United States Tax Court · Mar 30, 1956

The board took no action on this offer. … Von Weise v. Commissioner, 69 P. 2d 439 . The Sniders had made a prior offer which specifically included all of the assets of the company. This prior offer was not accepted.

Lee Hoffman v. The United States

340 F.2d 645 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1964

Bateson Co. v. … As we stated, in Williams v.

Lewis v. United States

114 Fed. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2014

See Williams v. United States, 100 Fed. … See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.

Lewicki v. United States

204 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1974

Horne v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 145, 150 , 419 F. 2d 416, 419 (1969); Travis v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 67, 70 (1972). We concur with the unreported decision of Richard M. Goldman v. United States (W.D. … See Cowan v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 739, 744-45 , 316 F. 2d 740, 744 (1963); Ward v. United States, 158 F. 2d 499, 500-01 (8th Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 844 (1947).

O'Brien v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 655 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1953

See Baxter v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 632 ; Borak v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 236,245 ; Borak v. Biddle, 147 F. 2d 278, 281 . … Green v. United States, No. 48991, 124 C.

Berdan Fire-Arms Manufacturing Co. v. United States

26 Ct. Cl. 48 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1890

(Burr v. Duryee, 1 Wallace, 531; Case v. Brown, 2 Wallace, 820; Seymour v. Osborn, 11 Wallace, 516; Dedrick v. Seigmund, Official Gazette, vol. 52, No. 10, p. 1537; The Corn Planter Patent, 23 Wallace, 181.) … It appeared that Palmer had exhibited his invention to a board of army officers, which recommended its adoption to the War Department.

Spanishtown Enterprises, Inc. v. Transcend Resources, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 23, 2020

See Omega SA v. … See Lipton Indus., Inc. v.