Case law

J. E. Robertson Co. v. United States

437 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943); United States v. Allegheny County, 322 U.S. 174, 183 (1944). … V, 1965-1969).

Knauth v. United States

1 Ct. Cust. 422 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 11, 1911

v. … Hartranft v. Wiegman ( 121 U. S., 609 ); Rossman v. United States supra, p. 280 (T. D. 31321); Knauth v. United States (155 Fed. Rep., 144); Kraut v. United States (142 Fed. Rep., 1037).

08-17 718

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55 (1994). … Dinsay v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 79, 81 (1996).

Multi-Roof Systems Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,530 · United States Court of Claims · May 30, 1984

Age Engineering, Inc. v. … a)(1); Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v.

10-22 216

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 29, 2015

Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007); Hayes v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 67 (1996). Adequacy means that the Board can perform an informed readjudication. Barr, 21 Vet. App. at 303. … Stefl v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 120 (2007); Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 405 (1994).

Ware v. United States

57 Fed. Cl. 782 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 25, 2003

C (Petition for Review of Order of Interior Board of Land Appeals, Ware v. United States, No. 90-6312-JO (D. Or. filed July 25, 1990)). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997); Newby v. United States, 57 Fed.Cl. 283, 293 (2003). Likewise precluded are Ware’s requests that his ownership and possession of the mining claims be restored.

Application of Frederick K. Kirchner

305 F.2d 897 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 25, 1962

This was the reasoning of the Scudi case, cited by the board, and was urged by Coan in the Biel v. Coan case. … As was said in Biel v.

98-18 992

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

In June 2009, the Court issued an Order vacating that part of the November 2008 Board decision described above, and remanded the matter to the Board. … See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993); see also Hart v. Mansfield, 21 Vet. App. 505 (2007).

Justus v. Principi

3 Vet. App. 510 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 2, 1992

The Board concluded that the additional evidence (Dr. Thakkar’s letter) submitted since the prior Board decision was not new and material. … As we have indicated, that is a question of fact for the Board to decide upon reopening and readjudication with a statement of reasons or bases for its findings. See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1991).

Olympia Shipping Corp. v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 251 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1930

’s attention to the provisions of the charter twice before the Shipping Board executed the contract and that, notwithstanding this fact and after the Shipping Board had presumably taken legal advice, it executed the contract … Atlantic Refining Co. v. United States, 69 C. Cls. *264 713 . New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States, 29 Fed. (2d) 1014.

Ashland Licensing & Intellectual Property LLC v. Sunpoint International Group USA Corp.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 7, 2016

Co. v. Mann Overall Co., 359 F.2d 450, 149 USPQ 518 (CCPA 1966). The CCPA agreed that the Board properly followed the “reasoned opinion” set forth in an earlier 1955 Commissioner’s petition decision, Sunbeam Corp. v. … Indus., Inc. v.

Smith v. United States

155 Ct. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1961

Hearing was granted by the correction board. … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 ; Watson v. United States, 142 Ct. Cl. 749 ; Glackum v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 404 , 296 F. 2d 226 .

International Graphics, Division of Moore Business Forms, Inc. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,963 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 23, 1983

Local 2855 v. Brown, 602 F.2d at 580-81; quoting Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, 356 U.S. 309, 318 , 78 S.Ct. 752, 757 , 2 L.Ed.2d 788 (1958). … A-76, ¶ 7c(3) (Revised August 30, 1967); quoted in Local 2855 v. Brown, 602 F.2d at 581.

City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, Board of Public Utilities

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 6, 2015

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, ) ASBCA No. 59877 Board of Public … of City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, Board of Public Utilities, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

FARIAS

21 I. & N. Dec. 269 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996

See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S 421, 431 (1987); INS v. … See Ziffrin v.

Chandler v. Mock. Mock v. Chandler

202 F.2d 755 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1953

Mock, 450 F.2d 563 , 32 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1183; Burns v. Curtis, 172 F.2d 588 , 36 C.C.P.A., Patents, 860; Powell v. Poupitch, 167 F.2d 514 , 35 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1080; Balogh v. … See also Kruger v. Resnick, 197 F.2d 348 , 39 C.C.P.A., Patents, 994; Mock v. Johnson, 52 App.D.C. 300 , 286 F. 639 ; Paul v. Hess, 24 App.D.C. 462 .

210416-154143

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2021

See Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 467, 470-71 (1993). When reviewing such medical opinions, the Board may appropriately favor the opinion of one competent medical authority over another. See Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet. … However, the Board may not reject medical opinions based on its own medical judgment. Obert v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 30 (1993); see also Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 171 (1991).

SMALL

23 I. & N. Dec. 448 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2002

Concurring Opinion: GRANT, Board Member. Dissenting Opinions: FILPPU, Board Member, joined by MOSCATO, Board Member; ROSENBERG, Board Member, joined by ESPENOZA, Board Member. … Compare INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415, 424-25 (1999) (explaining that courts owe deference to the Board’s construction of ambiguous language in the statute administered by the Board), with Adams Fruit Co. v.

Joint Venture WMV Brussels American School

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Dec 5, 2024

Appellant initially filed the appeal with five counts in its Complaint, although it and the government later jointly moved to dismiss Counts II through V. … Id. at 18,331-32 (citing Securiforce International America, LLC v. United States, 879 F.3d 1354, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2018) and Duke University v.

Fannie Mae Clackum v. United States

296 F.2d 226 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579 , 78 S.Ct. 433 , 2 L.Ed.2d 503 . . . ... ,. . . After her discharge, the plaintiff an- , . , ,. -r, v. • i t> - ‘ pealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. … The hearing was closed and the Discharge Review Board made the following “Findings After consideration of the evidence record> including the 201 file in the case, the Board finds: “a- That the discharge of the applicants