Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.29s
126 Fed. Cl. 203 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 25, 2016
The District Court explained: Plaintiffs repeated filing of civil actions rehashing the same arguments is improper and harassing and clearly unwarranted. … Plaintiff has not established that he was a third party beneficiary to either contract.
Cited 14 timesPublishedKuttroff, Pickhardt & Co. v. United States
21 C.C.P.A. 332 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 2, 1934
that the merchandise was also described and dutiable (if not dutiable under paragraph 28) in paragraph 27 of the same act, by virtue of the provision therein contained for “phthalic acid” and “phthalic anhydride”, and the qualifying … That Congress had in mind making dutiable in paragraph 28 certain resins or resinlike substances which were “prepared from” phenol is clearly indicated by the quoted provisions of the paragraph.
Cited 1 timesPublishedApplication of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to the Former Panama Canal Zone
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Mar 17, 1981
The Treaty deals less clearly with the question what law shall govern these areas. … Construing these Treaty provisions consist ently and in keeping with the purpose of the Treaty, we conclude that 2 The “contiguous zone” is defined as “the entire zone established or to be established by the United States
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst Western Government Secur., Inc. v. Commissioner
94 T.C. 549 · United States Tax Court · Apr 9, 1990
In 1969, the Tax Court was established by Congress as an article I court. Sec. 7441. … (f) Qualified State Individual Income Taxes. — For purposes of this section, a deficiency placed in dispute or claimed overpayment with regard to a qualified State individual income tax to which subchapter E of chapter 64
Cited 6 timesPublished44 T.C. 647 · United States Tax Court · Jul 28, 1965
as a corporation in liquidation under section 337(a) of the 1954 Code; or whether the corporation failed to qualify under section 337(a) because it (a) failed to adopt a plan of liquidation until after the date on which … Clearly, the direct cash distributions to the brothers were “transfers” to them within the intendment of section 6901 of the 1954 Code, the statute that pertains to transferee liability.
Cited 21 timesPublishedHoerth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 4, 2021
Hoerth does not qualify for an award of attorneys’ fees because he has failed to establish a reasonable basis for the assertion that Mr. … Hoerth has established reasonable basis.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnderground Construction Co. v. United States
35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,604 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 9, 1988
As a result, there is nothing in the Government’s failure to act prior to the time of its initial claim that could clearly be regarded as establishing a “common basis of understanding” regarding interpretation of the contract … Here, no sequence of events has been established since no events can be fairly discerned.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGeo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 45 · United States Customs Court · Aug 2, 1956
us now. ■ Two witnesses, who by reason of extensive experience in the purchase and sale of standard newsprint, the volume of business transacted, and the geographical areas to which their sales extended, were eminently qualified … Further, with regard to plaintiff's witness Lutz, it is now clearly made to appear that his experience with standard newsprint paper, at and prior to June 17, 1930, was of a very limited nature.
Cited 4 timesPublished4 T.C. 1242 · United States Tax Court · Apr 30, 1945
Alex was president of the corporation and owned all of its stock except qualifying shares. … Petitioner Alex *198 McCutchin owned all the shares of the corporation except qualifying shares and directly managed the corporation as its president.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFirst Sec. Bank, N.A. v. Commissioner
63 T.C. 644 · United States Tax Court · Mar 17, 1975
The record in the matter before us clearly indicates that $15,000 20 of the total $25,000 of initial expenditures paid by the petitioner banks represents the cost of computer programing and servicing and is therefore within … Prior to the entering into of the licensing agreements, neither Idaho nor Utah had ever established or administered a consumer credit card plan.
Cited 11 timesPublished38 B.T.A. 989 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 21, 1938
authorizing its creation, as being “for the sole and exclusive benefit of such of the officers and employees of the company (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the Pensioners) who desire to take advantage thereof and who can qualify … If this was the purpose of the organization of the pension trust fund, then the award of more than 81 percent of its benefits to the petitioner is clearly not within that purpose.
Cited 0 timesPublished21 I. & N. Dec. 357 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996
This practice clearly inflicts harm or suf- fering upon the girl or woman who undergoes it. FGM is extremely painful and at least temporarily incapacitating. It per- manently disfigures the female genitalia. … In view of the positions taken by the parties, the applicant would qualify for relief under either proffered social group.1 I agree with a favorable exercise of discretion on this record.
Cited 154 timesPublishedMandril v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2024
Petitioner alleged that he suffered from an acute, immune-mediated vaccine injury featuring myositis as a result of receiving seasonal influenza and Tdap vaccines on April 3, 2019. Pet. at 1. … Petitioner did provide evidence from a treating neurologist noting her impression of a resolved vaccine-related immune mediated myositis.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEstate of Finder v. Commissioner
37 T.C. 411 · United States Tax Court · Dec 4, 1961
In support of his claim as to the proper interpretation of the notice of deficiency, the respondent introduced the testimony and report of the revenue agent who made the examination, which clearly shows that the adjustment … It is well established that the respondent’s determination has the support of a presumption of correctness, and that the burden of proof to establish a deductible loss, and the amount of it, rests upon the taxpayer.
Cited 44 timesPublishedSilverio v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 9, 2019
Graf noted a question of whether G.L.’s immunizations were the trigger. Id. … He was qualified as an expert in pediatric neurology without objection. Tr. 19-25. 20 Varivax package insert, Merck & Co. (2013), filed as “Pet.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKathleen Hiraga v. Sylvester J. Arena
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 18, 2009
While this limited-circulation sales catalogue may be a publication in the broadest sense of the word, it does not qualify as a work “available to the general public in libraries or of general circulation among … As to Items #2 and #5, invoices of respondent’s vendors are clearly not “printed publications” or official records - 5 - Cancellation No. 92047976 and are therefore inappropriate
Cited 0 timesPublishedLuigi Bormioli Corp., Inc. v. United States
118 F. Supp. 2d 1345 · United States Court of International Trade · Oct 19, 2000
TD 85-111 establishes three criteria that must be met in order for a charge to qualify as an interest payment at a particular rate: 1) the interest charge is identified separately; 2) there is a financing agreement in … The 1987 letter agreement clearly contemplated an interest rate that would change with time. This did not change with the two additional letter modifications.
Cited 4 timesPublishedManagement Solutions & Systems, Inc. v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 820 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 30, 2007
If a competitive bid process had occurred, MSSI would have been qualified to compete for the procurement, because it had performed these services in the past. See AR at 49-76. … MSSI contends that the Modification is “clearly unlawful,” because it was made in violation of SBA’s “adverse impact” rule, pursuant to 13 C.F.R. § 124.504 (c). PI. AR Br. at 9.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Tax Court · Oct 6, 2025
Memo. 2020-73. 6 The record establishes that RA Herrera, who conducted the CSC return examination, made the “initial determination” to assert the sec- tion 6662 penalty. The record also establishes that Mr. … Guastello had not signified his approval—and if the IRS in consequence had not determined a penalty in the Notice of Defi- ciency—petitioner would still have had no immunity from the penalty.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 B.T.A. 60 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 31, 1931
Byers, 35 Fed. (2d) 326, is significant and enlightening in determining the instant proceeding: We think this is sufficient to establish that he was free to engage, and was engaged, in other business for other clients; that … , from the foregoing discussion of the facts in the instant proceeding, petitioner does not qualify as an officer.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna