Case law

In Re Hass

141 F.2d 122 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 7, 1944

V, page 483, as well as the references Henry, Kanao, and Schmidt. The Board of Appeals, however, in affirming the examiner’s decision, relied solely upon the references Angelí et al. and Beilstein’s “Handbuch,” 4th. … Subsequent to the examiner’s statement to the Board of Appeals, counsel for appellants filed two affidavits which are of record. One by one of the joint applicants (Henry B. Hass), and the other by Harry V.

Keeney v. United States

150 Ct. Cl. 53 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1960

Defendant says that plaintiff’s claim first accrues when he is discharged from the Government, and since, as we stated in Cuiffo v. United States, 181 Ct. … As we pointed out in Cuiffo v.

Keith A. Houghtling v. United States

114 Fed. Cl. 149 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 23, 2013

Defendant cites the opinion of our predecessor court in Cochran v. … The fact that a reasonable person might have reached a different conclusion is insufficient to overturn the decision of a board. Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. United States

771 F. Supp. 1239 · United States Court of International Trade · Aug 16, 1991

Despite this, face finished plywood, particle board and gypsum board, all of which are used 95% or more of the time as wall covering are not building board. … See, e.g., Daw Indus., Inc. v. United States, 1 Fed.Cir. (T) 146, 147 n. 4, 714 F.2d 1140 , 1141 n. 4 (1983); Nippon Kogaku, Inc. v.

G-N-C

22 I. & N. Dec. 281 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1998

INS v. … Ayala v.

09-00 608

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2014

App. 542, 584 (1992); O'Hare v. Derwinski, 1 Vet App. 365 (1991); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). The Board is mindful of this obligation in its determination below. … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

Thomas C Taylor v. Motor Trend Group, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Sep 8, 2023

Land O’ Lakes, Inc. v. Hugunin, 88 USPQ2d 1957, 1959 (TTAB 2008). … Guenther & Son Inc. v.

Steven P. Pirkkala v. Department of Justice

2016 MSPB 16 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 31, 2016

Verkennes v. … He need prove only that his ability to file with the Board was “affected” or “impaired” by illness. Washington v.

Thomas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2025

Cir. 2011) (quoting Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983)); see also Chappell v. … Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 872 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 198 (1962)).

In re Marriott Corp.

517 F.2d 1364 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1975

Coca-Cola Co. v. Clay, 324 F.2d 198 , 51 CCPA 777 (1963); Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. … See Aloe Creme Laboratories v. Aloe 99, Inc., 485 F.2d 1241 (CCPA 1973); Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Dunhill Tailored Clothes, Inc., 293 F.2d 685 , 49 CCPA 730 (1961).

Old Swiss House, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

569 F.2d 1130 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 16, 1978

Compare De Sylva v. Ballen-tine, 351 U.S. 570 , 76 S.Ct. 974 , 100 L.Ed. 1415 (1956), with United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co., 412 U.S. 580 , 93 S.Ct. 2389 , 37 L.Ed.2d 187 (1973). … Payne v.

Harold Unterberg v. The United States

412 F.2d 1341 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

Towell v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 422 (1960); Uhley v. United States, 147 F.Supp. 497 , 137 Ct.Cl. 275 (1957). 3 . … See McCallin v. United States, 180 Ct.Cl. 220 (1967). The instant case is obviously distinguishable from Russell v.

United States v. Furuya Co.

6 Ct. Cust. 207 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1915

The decision in Murphy v. Arnson, supra, was not at that time brought to our attention nor considered by the board. … , and it is in no way in conflict with the original view laid down by the board in T.

Headley v. Bridges

48 F.2d 938 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 29, 1931

Field v. Colman, 47 App. D. C. 189. … Among them are Allen v. United States ex rel. Lowry, 26 App. D. C. 8; In re Fullagar, 32 App. D. C. 222; Cooper v. Gold, 34 App. D. C. 194; Carlin v. Goldberg, 45 App. D. C. 540; Parker v. Craft et al., 49 App. D.

Centre Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. The United States

392 F.2d 229 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968

Co. v. United States, 347 F.2d 235, 241 , 171 Ct.Cl. 70, 76 *233 (1965), citing, United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 , 39 S.Ct. 59 , 63 L.Ed. 166 (1918). … Corp. v. United States, 360 F.2d 634 , 175 Ct.Cl. 518 (1966); J. D. Hedin Constr. Co., supra; R. M. Hollingshead Corp. v. United States, 111 F.Supp. 285 , 124 Ct.Cl. 681 (1953).

Rogers v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1023 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1992

Brown v. United States, 5 Ci.Ct. 1, 16 (1984). … See Pinkston v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 263, 265-67 (1984); Singleton v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 156, 164 (1984); South Louisiana Grain Services v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 281, 288 (1982). .

Robertson Electric Co. v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 1287 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

River Construction Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254 (1962). … Rolin v. United States, supra. .

Roger v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 201 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 5, 1924

it was therefore a local tax and should not have been included under the ruling in United States v. … The board was clearly right on this point, and the question was not pressed by the importers before this court. The Board of General Appraisers held that the ruling in the case of Passavant v. United States (18 Sup. Ct.

A-T

25 I. & N. Dec. 4 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009

Oforji v. … V.

Casey D. Weathers v. Department of the Navy

2014 MSPB 57 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 24, 2014

Department of Labor v. … See Clark v.